Jump to content

Talk:Manos: The Hands of Fate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ffranc (talk | contribs) at 13:49, 5 April 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former featured articleManos: The Hands of Fate is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 30, 2008.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 17, 2006Good article nomineeListed
April 26, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
May 7, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
October 20, 2009Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Manos: The Hands of Fate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:01, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manos: The Hands of Fate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

E. Hoffmann Price

Was this movie based on the short story The Hands of Manos by E. Hoffmann Price? 209.112.210.129 (talk) 22:45, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

wiki indicates story came out in a 1975 compilation, but perhaps published in a mag sometime earlier. how MUCH earlier? have more details?
movie was 1966. so it seems unlikely a priori. 209.172.23.107 (talk) 23:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Camera Workprint" is a nonsense.

I have removed a reference to the restored version being taken from an "original camera" workprint since this is a nonsensical phrase. There is was camera original (usually a negative but in this case positive) which was an Ektachrome stock in this case, but a workprint is a copy of that on a positive print stock (In the 60s called Film Print or Fine Grain, the film can in the manosinHD article says "fine print and is branded "Gevaert" a Belgian manufacturer of film stock who merged with German firm Agfa in the 1960s.

None of the articles linked to claim the copy found is the camera original, and one makes claim to the print showing the "Ektachrome image" but this is likely a reference to it reproducing the Ektachrome original via the print stock. Given the volatility of camera stocks, it's likely the original footage has rotted away to nearly nothing by now. Verlaine76 (talk) 22:59, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]