Jump to content

User talk:Alvinategyeka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alvinategyeka (talk | contribs) at 18:21, 5 April 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Teahouse logo

Hi Alvinategyeka! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

10:30, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Davinia Esther Anyakun has been accepted

Davinia Esther Anyakun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 16:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Agnes Nandutu has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Agnes Nandutu. Thanks! Nosebagbear (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agnes Nandutu (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The Sqoop source isn't a very trusted source for systems
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Mjs1991 (talk) 09:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Agnes Nandutu concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Agnes Nandutu, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Agnes Nandutu

Hello, Alvinategyeka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Agnes Nandutu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Kirumira moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rose Kirumira, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GirthSummit (blether) 14:23, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - just a personal note to explain in a bit more detail why I moved this to draft. Your article was about a living person, but it didn't contain any sources at all - our verifiability require that information is referenced to reliable sources, and with biographies of living people it's particularly important. You can carry on working on the article as a draft until it's ready to publish, with reliable sourcing demonstrating that the subject is notable, and then move it back into article space when it's ready. Hope this makes sense, let me know if you have any questions. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 14:26, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rose Kirumira (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AaqibAnjum were:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:Layout and WP:Tone altogether. -
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 16:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rose Kirumira has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rose Kirumira. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 16:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have made corrections on the article, please review again and advise accordingly. Thanks alot Alvinategyeka (talk) 19:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robina Hope Mukisa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robina Hope Mukisa, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:28, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lydia Daphine Mirembe moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lydia Daphine Mirembe, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Lamwaka moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Catherine Lamwaka, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lydia Daphine Mirembe has been accepted

Lydia Daphine Mirembe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 07:52, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, look forward to creating more Alvinategyeka (talk) 10:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Catherine Lamwaka has been accepted

Catherine Lamwaka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:45, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, this is encouraging, look forward to creating more articles. Thanks Alvinategyeka (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rose kirumira namubiru

A better place for a request like that is Wikipedia:Teahouse. Art LaPella (talk) 17:37, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thanks alot let me move it there Alvinategyeka (talk) 20:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rose Kirumira (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NARTIST for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks let me work on the mistakes and resubmit. Thanks Alvinategyeka (talk) 06:38, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did some copyediting and clean-up, but it still needs work before being submitted again. David notMD (talk) 11:42, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robina Hope Mukisa has been accepted

Robina Hope Mukisa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 08:04, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks looking forward to creating more. Alvinategyeka (talk) 09:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also cleaned up this article. Please take more care with capitalization. Also, punctuation marks are placed before the references, not after. David notMD (talk) 11:51, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks alot Alvinategyeka (talk) 12:29, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Agnes Kunihira

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Agnes Kunihira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO   A&E⇑  10:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Avur Pacuto moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jane Avur Pacuto, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks alot Alvinategyeka (talk) 12:30, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rosette Kajungu Mutambi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rosette Kajungu Mutambi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 13:45, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agnes Kunihira moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Agnes Kunihira, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the guidance Alvinategyeka (talk) 18:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alvinategyeka&oldid=949302560"