Talk:Storm Area 51

Storm Area 51 has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 6, 2020. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Storm Area 51 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 3 days

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 July 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States GA‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Internet culture GA‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

GA

This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Requested move 9 October 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Sceptre (talk) 19:46, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Storm Area 51, They Can't Stop All of Us → Storm Area 51 – The shorter title is widely more used. It googles 4 times as many as the full title and it is used as the universal name in the internet meme community (such as the KYM entry hardly even mentioning the full title). Although the original event had the description as well, WP:COMMONNAME clearly points to omit it. The full event name should still be the boldface title term in the article body, but a reader would expect to find this article with the event's shortened, commonly used, name. Gaioa (T C L) 18:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, that makes sense to me. As long as the full title is theboldface in the lead I think that's a much better reasoning for moveing it than others have proposed— Preceding unsigned comment added by IntegralPython (talk • contribs) 21:02, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mark Schierbecker (talk) 19:06, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Concise and accurate title. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Most of the references refer to the shorter title (or "Area 51 Raid") and rarely is the full name used Qwaiiplayer (talk) 15:58, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I couldn’t agree more. —CamiloCBranco (talk) 21:37, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Concise and unambiguous. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:20, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Concise and accurate. –Davey2010^Talk 08:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per IntegralPython’s suggestion above. ◢   Ganbaruby!   (talk to me) 08:56, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

new redirect

This article needs a redirect for "area 51 meme" and other things similar. Mᴇɢᴀɢᴏᴀᴛ (talk) 12:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MegaGoat: Well, why don't you make the redirect yourself? Just go to the page with the name you want (such as Area 51 meme) and paste #REDIRECT [[blah blah blah]] there. On the other hand, please make sure that the redirect will be useful for the readers before creating it (see WP:RPURPOSE for more details). Thank you. Gaioa (T C L) 14:28, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thanks for the help. Never knwe that! Mᴇɢᴀɢᴏᴀᴛ (talk) 14:53, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use image in Gathering section?

I feel like we should have a picture of the people who gathered at the gates. There probably ain't any free images of it out there (correct me if I'm wrong🙂), but I think a fair use image would comply with WP:NFCC#8 - the section looks really bland now.
I considered either one of these photos or the group picture in here Gaioa (T C L) 06:42, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. A relative handful of people gathered in the desert. Any decent writer can summarize what the sources say about the gathering in prose. Why would a free encyclopedia use a non-free image for such a trivial gathering? We certainly can't appropriate a newspaper's photos. No way. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:55, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, its not hard to imagine 150 people hanging around outside a gate.Slatersteven (talk) 08:07, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is the picture of the sign and the path legal?

It says no photography doesn’t it? (And by the way, is that an FBI car😋?Just kidding.) Heroe Of Time (talk) 11:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Clap alien cheeks" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Clap alien cheeks. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Storm Area 51/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 04:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opening statement

In reviews I conduct, I may make small copyedits. These will only be limited to spelling and punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. For replying to Reviewer comment, please use Done, Fixed, Added, Not done, Doing..., or Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. —♠Vami _IV†♠ 04:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Background

~~Expand this section. When was Area 51 established, and to what end?~~

Done I've added some more info relating to the site's opening and history, but let me know if you want more to be added. WackyWikiWoo (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Citation [1] is now repeated without need in the second paragraph.

Fixed WackyWikiWoo (talk) 13:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~around the time the military began flying CIA U2 spy planes in the area. They would not be CIA planes if the USAF was flying them.~~

Removed I've removed that part of the sentence all together, it seems sufficient to just mention UFOs were spotted at the site. WackyWikiWoo (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

~~"Facebook event and internet meme" is the place to introduce and discuss Matty Roberts.~~

Done I've moved it down to that section. WackyWikiWoo (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Add his first name, please.~~

Done WackyWikiWoo (talk) 13:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oh, that's Naturo running. What's this cheek clapping the youngins are talking about?~~

Done I've added an... explanation? WackyWikiWoo (talk) 05:59, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, hilarious. Things like this make me wonder what aliens will think of us if they ever show up above our ball of rock. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 11:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This? ◢   Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 13:46, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 15:08, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~B-2 stealth bomber Could you make one link out of the three here?~~

Done WackyWikiWoo (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Combine "Gathering" and "Music festivals"~~

Done WackyWikiWoo (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~The county has just 184 hotel rooms Make this past-tense.~~

Done WackyWikiWoo (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA progress

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

IMpact

Most (all?) of the impact stuff is future tense, about preparations and projections (an issue here of wp:notnews). This should be re-written to be about the actual (not projected) impact.Slatersteven (talk) 10:38, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Slatersteven: I don’t see the issue, the section is talking about the impact on businesses and towns at the time of the event. I can’t see any future tense? Cartrisge273 (talk) 02:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First line, 40,000 people did not turn up so there was no impact of that scale. Second line... and so on. Anything about what people thoght might happen and prepared for is not an impact, its a projected impact that never happened.Slatersteven (talk) 09:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Slatersteven: I read it as the immediate impact the event had on businesses and the towns surrounding the site, maybe you/I’ve misinterpreted? Could you suggest an alternative title for the section that may be better? Cartrisge273 (talk) 15:48, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]