User talk:Yungeditor

Welcome!

Hello, Yungeditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Joshua Wong did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:54, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello, I'm Matthew hk. I noticed that you recently removed content from Guo Wengui without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Matthew hk (talk) 18:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Guo Wengui, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 18:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Singapore, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — MarkH₂₁^talk 09:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, when adding new photos of city skylines & landmarks, do not use the infobox parameter image_map. That's for maps as the name suggests. Use image_skyline instead. — MarkH₂₁^talk 09:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained removal of a user's comment in a Move discussion

Yungeditor, in this edit, you deleted Bluerasberry's vote on the subject. I shouldn't have to explain why that kind of behavior is unacceptable. Do not do it again. BirdValiant (talk) 00:11, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You also deleted votes in this edit: [1] Please note that the article is under general sanctions relating to COVID-19 and so behavior like you've displayed is liable to get you blocked or have some other discretionary sanctions. BirdValiant (talk) 01:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Uyghurs, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Warning - Last Chance

Your edits on Uyghurs ([2]) changed text to blatantly misrepresent or completely not represent the present sources.

Your edits show a clear pattern of removing material critical of China and adding material that uses non-neutral language ([3], [4], [5], [6]) You do this even when the present sources support the existing language. In some cases you blank entire sections ([7], [([8]).

On Huawei, you repeatedly added words expressing doubt despite that hedging being absent in the source ([9], [10])

Additionally, you've used misleading edit summaries (see Uyghurs diff, [11], [12], [13])

Of your edits here this far, I see few that are constructive. So, to be clear, this is your final warning. If you continue this pattern of disruptive editing or cast WP:ASPERSIONS at editors correcting you, you will be blocked. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, disregard that. I just saw your edits on Talk:Spanish flu (removing other users' comments that were not aligned with your own and !voting twice). EvergreenFir (talk) 05:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]