Jump to content

User talk:81.170.40.71

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 81.170.40.71 (talk) at 16:31, 13 April 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

April 2020

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months to prevent you from evading blocks.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:04, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.170.40.71 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What on Earth are you talking about? Evading blocks? 81.170.40.71 (talk) 11:51, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:59, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.170.40.71 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't even know what I've been blocked for. How exactly am I supposed to defend myself against that? I just keep hearing 'evading blocks' and before this was involved in a discussion with some editor who kept deleting my attempts to add a section to a talk page. This editor went on to accuse me of something similar and claimed I had been blocked. How am I supposed to defend against a lurid accusation of evading blocks followed by a swift block? 81.170.40.71 (talk) 13:29, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

81.170.40.71 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It's pretty obvious something that isn't actually true is the case, is it? That's absolutely fascinating, friend. Why don't you enlighten me as to how exactly it's so (apparently) obvious to you. I have absolutely no idea what I'm reading here. What is this? You're suggesting this 'Cassandrathesceptic' is me? Why exactly? How on Earth am I honestly supposed to defend myself from a claim like this? What kind of joke is this? 81.170.40.71 (talk) 16:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=It's pretty obvious something that isn't actually true is the case, is it? That's absolutely fascinating, friend. Why don't you enlighten me as to how exactly it's so (apparently) obvious to you. I have absolutely no idea what I'm reading here. What is this? You're suggesting this 'Cassandrathesceptic' is me? Why exactly? How on Earth am I honestly supposed to defend myself from a claim like this? What kind of joke is this? [[Special:Contributions/81.170.40.71|81.170.40.71]] ([[User talk:81.170.40.71#top|talk]]) 16:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=It's pretty obvious something that isn't actually true is the case, is it? That's absolutely fascinating, friend. Why don't you enlighten me as to how exactly it's so (apparently) obvious to you. I have absolutely no idea what I'm reading here. What is this? You're suggesting this 'Cassandrathesceptic' is me? Why exactly? How on Earth am I honestly supposed to defend myself from a claim like this? What kind of joke is this? [[Special:Contributions/81.170.40.71|81.170.40.71]] ([[User talk:81.170.40.71#top|talk]]) 16:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=It's pretty obvious something that isn't actually true is the case, is it? That's absolutely fascinating, friend. Why don't you enlighten me as to how exactly it's so (apparently) obvious to you. I have absolutely no idea what I'm reading here. What is this? You're suggesting this 'Cassandrathesceptic' is me? Why exactly? How on Earth am I honestly supposed to defend myself from a claim like this? What kind of joke is this? [[Special:Contributions/81.170.40.71|81.170.40.71]] ([[User talk:81.170.40.71#top|talk]]) 16:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}