Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil/Archives/2020/April
This is an archive of past discussions about COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Swap lines by bars in some graphs
Maybe line graphs are more adequate to cummulative data and bar graphs to daily data. Other country pages already follow this 'convention'. Luís Felipe Braga
- Agreed --Hagnat (talk) 21:51, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Fill out the cites!
This article is a month old and already has 10 "Archived copy" cites. It should have NONE. I fix cite errors, not chronic problems. User-duck (talk) 03:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Less Images, please!
There is too many images in this article. Please, reduce the amount of images on it. Keep only images that are meaningful. --Hagnat (talk) 07:33, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Replicated Charts
Several charts are redundant.
200.68.142.118 (talk) 04:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC) Baden K.
Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2020
This edit request to 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Brazil has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On March 19, Scientists predict up to 2 million deaths in Brazil in the worst scenario without measures to contain the virus. They point out that maintaining social distance is one of the most effective measures without a vaccine.[87] - This statement has ZERO CREDIBILITY - source does not inform the names of scientists - All world together (>7 Billion people) now has 25k deaths but it will Brazil (200 Million people) that shall have 2 M? Super Fake News! 189.62.45.156 (talk) 15:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already done looks like it was already removed I just checked the article. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 07:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 2 April 2020
This edit request to 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Brazil has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A reference to President Jair BOLSONARO is followed by "(sem partido)" in Portuguese. "Sem Partido" can be translated as ("Without Party Affiliation". 2601:C6:C07F:F150:8556:7807:5449:FD60 (talk) 20:55, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 07:14, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 4 April 2020
This edit request to 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Brazil has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In sub heading "Response" Remove:
"This means, in the assessment of a statistical expert in epidemiology, Antonio Ponce de Leon, that the rate of infections in Brazil is slower."
This statement does not take the amount of testing into consideration and therefore, even if true, is not relevant in this context. Correlations between confirmed cases and the rate of infections are deficient.
Check this source for further clarification: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus#cases-of-covid-19 Andus99 (talk) 15:40, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Already done Removed with this edit. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 07:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Background section
For a debate about the new introduction of the Background section, please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_COVID-19#Mass_duplicates_for_"Background".--walkeetalkee 17:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Streamlined Timeline
I did a round on the timeline section. I made it easier to identify which date things were happening, and removed a lot of non-notable items. There is no need to write about the number of confirmed cases for a given day, if that is a statistical information. After the initial cases/suspects of the virus, there is no need to know the personal information of the patients. --Hagnat (talk) 18:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)