User talk:MaranoFan/Archive 7/Archives/ 6

DYK for Me!

On 8 June 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Me!, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that spelling is fun, according to Taylor Swift? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Me!. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Me!), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk: Camila Cabello#DMY Instead of MDY Due to Being a Cuban Citizen. It Should've Been Added When This Was First Made

I had done this way back in October but no responses came for this improvement. The main objective is that subject is a Cuban-American and was the only member of Fifth Harmony who didn't originate from the United States.

Even though she is also a citizen of the latter country, DMY is more appropriate since most countries in the Caribbean have that layout. As in her date of birth being typed something like: 3 March 1997. Or her debut single: 19 May 2017.

Had done this additionally at Robyn Fenty's page sadly it got rejected by PureRed. Barbadian born but raised here for fifteen and a half years.

Cheers,

67.81.163.178 (talk) 13:43, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 Reminder

Hi. I'm DannyS712 (talk), and I just wanted to remind you that you are a current participant in round 3 of this year's WikiCup! There are just over 2 weeks until the third round ends – if you haven't made you first submission for this round yet, there is still time to start; if you have already started, keep up the good work. See your submissions page: here. Good luck!

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 19:11, 12 June 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)

Your GA nomination of With You (Mariah Carey song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article With You (Mariah Carey song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:55, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

New message from Jevansen

Hello, MaranoFan. You have new messages at Jevansen's talk page.
Message added 08:14, 25 June 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jevansen (talk) 08:14, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

DYK for All the Ways

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

#JusticeForFram

Given everything that is going on, I have decided to join the fight for getting justice for Fram. We shall not be disrespected!--NØ 18:21, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 July newsletter

The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
• Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
• SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
• Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics

Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of With You (Mariah Carey song)

The article With You (Mariah Carey song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:With You (Mariah Carey song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of With You (Mariah Carey song)

The article With You (Mariah Carey song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:With You (Mariah Carey song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

IPs and Ed Sheeran

Hey, I literally just stumbled into a request you had made for help looking at some IP ranges removing Ed Sheeran-related file links. I don't know if you got anyone to help you, but I can tell you that you're dealing with two distinct ranges here: Special:Contributions/2A00:23C6:6583:1C00::0/64 and Special:Contributions/2A00:23C4:3E3A:F300::0/64. These ranges display interleaving timestamps going back several months, but are used on different days. It is almost certainly not the case that the true range is wider, but likely that it's one person in two different places. Looking at an even wider range from either of those, I do not see obvious evidence of the same editor. I have not formed any opinions at the moment, but I thought that perhaps knowing the ranges and having a list of every edit on those ranges might help you crystallize whatever thoughts you are forming. Best. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: I'm pinging you because you've protected Beautiful People (Ed Sheeran song). Please look into the IPs if you can. wumbolo ^^^ 12:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

No, I do not know how to do rangeblocks, one needs someone more competent than I.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Ymblanter, quick note, IPv6 /64 ranges can be treated basically the same as a single IPv4 IP, and (like any range really), can be blocked using Special:Block. Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I know this, but I am always afraid to block an entire state/province/big city whatever--Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

The IPs looks familiar. They must be Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Wikidestruction vandal. 2402:1980:240:ADB1:615:53A0:FBFD:C2A7 (talk) 15:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

"The user often removes single covers from infoboxes and claims that the images are 'up for deletion'", yup that bit pretty much confirms it. Thanks for solving the mystery.—NØ 15:54, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

• I find it highly likely that the IPs belong to Zawl/Flooded with them hundreds. He was just blocked for socking on the article for the new Sheeran album. I’ll get someone to block them if the range becomes active again.—NØ 13:29, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Note

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi MaranoFan, I'm not familiar with this history you note here, but talking that way to someone in an edit summary isn't appropriate. If there are harassment issues as you say there are, you should take the concerns to the appropriate administrative noticeboard rather than accuse someone of it in an edit summary. It can have a chilling effect, and isn't appropriate in content disputes as it is an aspersion unless accompanied by evidence. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:50, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

TonyBallioni, one look at their contributions makes it obvious that they’re only logging onto WP to look at my contributions and revert me wherever they can. As for their history of stalking and hounding me, just have a look over here. They have been told not to post on my talk page here and have refused to do it. I emailed Ritchie333 about this a few days ago who ghosted me as usual and refused to do anything about it.—NØ 05:52, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

If it is an issue, you can and should take it to a noticeboard such as WP:ANI, where their actions can be examined. That is the correct way to handle things. Not accusing people of things via edit summaries. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:54, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Some people just want drama. And starting a public discussion on one of the dramaboards will just be giving them what they want. Anyways, I’m doing a lot of constructive work and creating articles on topics of interest. If someone wants to be miserable and spend all their time stalking me around then that’s their prerogative. I don’t have the time, energy or will to willingly go to the dramaboards. I will be emailing you if this user doesn’t stay away from my talk page though.—NØ 06:00, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

I'd prefer if we kept everything on-wiki. You shouldn't accuse people of stalking you if you aren't willing to back it up or bring it to the attention of the community. Most administrators take this pretty seriously, so you would be listened to if you brought it to ANI, but keeping making the claims without making a case has a chilling effect on other editors, and isn't fair to them. If there is private information or what you believe is harassment isn't appropriate to be discussed in a public forum, you can also email the Arbitration Committee. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:36, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

I’ll email a different admin then if need be. I have plenty proof for my accusations (like almost every contribution June 25 onwards having to do with my edits), I’m just trying not to start drama. I don't have the extra time to be able to partake in lengthy AN discussions right now, please respect that. Also making it clear that Chasewc91 is not to post on my talk page, not even to defend them self.—NØ 07:17, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

"I emailed Ritchie333 about this a few days ago who ghosted me as usual and refused to do anything about it" ... or, just possibly, Ritchie333 was off-wiki all weekend and didn't have a chance to respond until just now, and still isn't sure what this issue is about. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:09, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Orphaned non-free image File:Kalaparva.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kalaparva.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Love Train

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Love Train you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:22, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Love Train

The article The Love Train you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Love Train for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:41, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Love Train

The article The Love Train you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Love Train for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:02, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

You're Invited!

Hello MaranoFan/Archive 7/Archives/ 6! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women music, an outreach effort which aims at improving articles about women music on Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Thank you!

WikiCup 2019 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Lover (Taylor Swift song)

valereee (talk) 00:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK for The Love Train

On 3 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Love Train, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Meghan Trainor's 2019 EP The Love Train was promoted through a press release which drew controversy because of its "graphic nature and bizarre phrasing"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Love Train. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Love Train), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:05, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Redirects

I was uncertain they met the criteria for CSD. That said, if you have no objections you can always tag the redirects yourself using CSD G7. -Ad Orientem (talk) 06:13, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, I don't object to their deletion. Please understand that the title had been announced when I created them, it just wasn't confirmed whether it's a song or album. I’m not going around creating redirects about completely leaked and speculative titles. Since I myself started the song article, it's okay to assume I'd be okay with these erroneous album redirects being deleted. 👌 Two discussions about it are unnecessary, and feel like putting a huge spotlight on the mistake.—NØ 06:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

No worries. I never had reason to believe anything untoward here. I will go ahead and zap them. -Ad Orientem (talk) 06:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Para Mi

Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 19:41, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Looking at the complications in this specific nomination, I'll defer to someone else. Thanks.—NØ 19:50, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Younger (Jonas Blue and HRVY song)

The article Younger (Jonas Blue and HRVY song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notyet notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 02:52, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK for The Man (Taylor Swift song)

On 16 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Man (Taylor Swift song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Taylor Swift uses Leonardo DiCaprio as an example to explain sexism in her song "The Man"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Man (Taylor Swift song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Man (Taylor Swift song)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 12:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

"Why'd You Have to Go?" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Why'd You Have to Go?. Since you had some involvement with the Why'd You Have to Go? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho (talk) 12:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Adam Cuerden (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 91 featured pictures, including 32 in the final round. Our finalists this year were:

1. Adam Cuerden (submissions) with 964 points
2. Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 899 points
3. Casliber (submissions) with 817 points
4. Kosack (submissions) with 691 points
5. SounderBruce (submissions) with 388 points
6. Enwebb (submissions) with 146 points
7. Usernameunique (submissions) with 145 points
8. HaEr48 (submissions) with 74 points

All those who reached the final will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

• Casliber (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 7 FAs during the course of the competition.
• Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 14 GAs in round 5.
• Yashthepunisher (submissions) wins the featured list prize, for 4 FLs overall.
• Adam Cuerden (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, for 91 FPs overall.
• MPJ-DK (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 7 articles in good topics in round 2.
• Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 14 did you know articles in round 5.
• Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 7 in the news articles in round 1.
• Ed! (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 56 good article reviews in round 1.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

We have opened a scoring discussion on whether the rules and scoring need adjustment. Please have your say. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2020 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth 14:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

"The Exhibitionist" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Exhibitionist. Since you had some involvement with the The Exhibitionist redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Vaporgaze (talk) 10:08, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!

Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

"The Exhibitionist (album)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Exhibitionist (album). Since you had some involvement with the The Exhibitionist (album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Vaporgaze (talk) 10:33, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

"The Exhibitionist (Ava Max album)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Exhibitionist (Ava Max album). Since you had some involvement with the The Exhibitionist (Ava Max album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Vaporgaze (talk) 10:34, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pratiyogita Darpan.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pratiyogita Darpan.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Epicgenius, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points.
• Gog the Mild came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare.
• Raymie was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States.
• Harrias came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist.
• CaptainEek was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing Cactus wren to featured article status.
• The top ten contestants at the end of Round 1 all scored over 200 points; they also included L293D, Kingsif, Enwebb, Lee Vilenski and CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement).

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup newsletter correction

There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter; L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead, Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of No (Meghan Trainor song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article No (Meghan Trainor song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iceywarm2020 -- Iceywarm2020 (talk) 02:01, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi MaranoFan, I've reverted this review per the concern raised here, and returned the article to its original place in the GAN queue. Sorry for the long wait at GAN. I hope all is well! Ajpolino (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, MaranoFan

Thank you for creating OK (Anxiety Anthem).

User:Sam-2727, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for taking the time to create this well written and formatted article!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sam-2727}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sam-2727 (talk) 03:38, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Swarajya.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Swarajya.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 00:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Untouchable Tour

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Untouchable Tour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)