User talk:Fefu2011

March 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to National Institute of Dramatic Art has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: National Institute of Dramatic Art was changed by Fefu2011 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893673 on 2015-03-30T05:40:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

Remember that when adding medical content please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:NIDa Antigone 2014.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:NIDa Antigone 2014.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:NIDA Kandahar Gate 2014.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:NIDA Kandahar Gate 2014.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:NIDA production of In the Blood 2014.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:NIDA production of In the Blood 2014.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:NIDA The False Servant 2014.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:NIDA The False Servant 2014.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 09:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fefu2011! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 09:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Bunch of nonsense references that have little to nothing to do with the subject WP:BOMBARD. The whole page is just a directory of past members and awards and not actually an encyclopedic article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:06, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:National Institute of Dramatic Art alumni. Thanks! — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:04, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help request re: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:National_Institute_of_Dramatic_Art_alumni

Question for administrator

Administrator help needed

Ask your question below.
If the issue requires immediate attention or input from many administrators, please go to the administrators' noticeboard for incidents instead.
If you want to edit a fully protected page, please use the edit request wizard or {{edit fully-protected}} instead. If you want an administrator to move a page, please go to Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. If the page needs repair from cut-and-paste moves, please go to Wikipedia:Requests for history merge.
If other users can help, please use the template {{help me}} instead.
Wikipedia's Live Help IRC is notified when this template is used. Alternatively, you can join the IRC channel directly.

When help has been offered, please add the |answered=yes parameter to deactivate the template.

I have tried to submit this for publication twice, and the same user has blocked me both times - first, for lack of citation (even though almost everyone has Wikipedia pages that were linked, which verify their status as alumni), then accused me of bombarding with "Bunch of nonsense references that have little to nothing to do with the subject" when I took the time to source over 100 trustworthy sources verifying their status as alumni/award winners. I left a comment on his user talk page more than 2 weeks ago asking what I can do to resolve this and he (assuming "Sulfurboy" indicates a man) is completely ignoring my query, despite responding to plenty of other people who have commented since. I will acknowledge I am not the most experienced Wikipedia user, so I'm not sure what can be done here, but it doesn't make sense to me that one person can just arbitrarily block the publication of a page for no apparent reason.

--Fefu2011 (talk) 04:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]