Jump to content

Split decision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 72.185.70.111 (talk) at 22:32, 27 April 2020 (Notable Fights). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A split decision (SD) is a winning criterion in boxing, most commonly in full-contact combat sports, in which two of the three judges score one particular competitor as the winner, while the third judge scores for the other competitor.

A split decision is different from a majority decision. A majority decision occurs when two judges pick the same competitor as the winner, and the third judge scores the contest a draw (tie). The official result remains the same in both split and majority decisions, but the margin of victory is greater in a majority decision and less in a split decision.

Occasionally, the judges' final decision is a tie, because the first judge scores for one competitor, the second one scores for the other competitor, and the third judge scores the contest a draw (tie); so in this case the official result is a split draw.

Often, a split decision causes controversy due to its lack of unanimity. As a result, especially in high-profile or title fights, the victor may be encouraged or pressured to grant a rematch, in the hopes a return match-up will have a more decisive outcome.

Notable Fights

On February 15, 1978 at the Hilton Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada, Muhammad Ali defended his Heavyweight championship against Leon Spinks. Before a national CBS Sports audience, Ali and Spinks went the distance for 15 rounds. One judge gave the bout to Ali (143-142) while two judges got 145-140 and 144-141 in favor of the new heavyweight champion Leon Spinks. It was the only time that Ali lost the title in the ring.

See also

References