Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dimpletisha

Dimpletisha

Dimpletisha (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dimpletisha/Archive.

05 May 2020

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets

XxPixel WarriorxX (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tylertoney Dude perfect (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The two above appear to be the same person. The "OK" edit summary is rather unique. [1][2][3] and [4][5][6][7]. Like socks before it they have edited articles such as Priyanka Purohit. Just like User:MiaSays, User:GracyM, User:Meenalxoxo did, confirmed socks. I do not think it is a coincidence both accounts landed on this article. I think they created the article originally and cannot stay away. Also both edited Ready or Not (2019 film)[8][9] Rain the 1 12:13, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Note: {{checkuser}} links fixed. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

The "Ok"s are weird. I do note that they only have two article intersections. I feel like Dimpletisha might have had slightly more competence than to format an infobox image like this. I've experienced an IPv6 vandal who likes to use "Ok", but I doubt they're related. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I also note this talk page post, "This was not my first time bro. It's my second ID I didn't liked my name at 1st ID so I changed". XxPixel WarriorxX was created on 3 May 2020, and Tylertoney Dude perfect stopped editing on 3 May 2020. So the questions are: 1) Is the user employing two accounts to perpetuate disruptive behaviour, and 2) Is the user evading a previous block, either as Dimpletisha or as someone else? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We can AGF if you are sure the other two are not connected with Dimpletisha. It is true that they could of just not liked the first username. I am unsure if they are evading a previous block. I note that the user's behaviour has quickly become an issue looking at their talk page. I do not know if that matches the behaviour of other accounts though.Rain the 1 08:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The accounts are Confirmed to each other, and Possible to confirmed socks based on geolocation. I have blocked without tags. Behavioural evidence needs evaluation. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 12:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]