User talk:ErbekBozok

May 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, TRT World. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. ◢   Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 15:49, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to TRT World. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. -◊PRAHLAD^Balaji 16:08, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not censoring, the paragraph criticism is not justified to present such channel. This would mean that you should not censor the same for other articles on other state owned channels that are exactly doing the same and are financed or owned by their State... check RT, check France 24 articles. ErbekBozok (talk) 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have remarked by reading simple articles about Turkey / Turkish that Wikipedia authorizes and blindly accepts many sided articles without proposing different point of views. This is propaganda when it is one sided. I thought Wikipedia is meant to be a universal encyclopedia and not a place to blasphème and give ones opinion and not the other. Please be careful about such situation. ErbekBozok (talk) 16:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some people may not agree; discuss it on the talkpage first. -◊PRAHLAD^Balaji 16:30, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not agree on Wikipedia’s policy to write the truth and only the truth or at least put a bracket and don’t show it as a statement. Every information has many versions, in this one you are wrong and this is desperately ridiculous. Thanks for showing the obvious that Wikipedia is a sided website. Censoring want they want. ErbekBozok (talk) 16:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at TRT World, you may be blocked from editing. -◊PRAHLAD^Balaji 16:48, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing? Vandalize ? Sorry who are you working for? I am a free man and I see injustice in this article and wanted to correct it. You are just closing the subject saying I should discuss it first, what is that if not censorship? Is this serious? If you continue to deliberately accuse me, I will write to the higher management to state my point and also clarify that you block me for editing in an open source encyclopedia where I am trying to clarify that your article is ONE SIDED. ErbekBozok (talk) 16:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]