Talk:Lu Over the Wall
Appearance
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Critical Response
User:The sleepwalker I reverted your edit deleting the review from RogerEbert.com. It seems to fit the guidelines on Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film#Critical response. If you'd like to further discuss that, please do so here. Ehler (talk) 03:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Why? The sleepwalker (talk) 04:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
You’re also a Missouri-synod Lutheran. Well, his comment in summary says he was bored. It’s a childish exaggeration and it’s not helpful to discerning whether the movie is worth watching or not. Therefore, it doesn’t add anything to the article. The sleepwalker (talk) 04:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class anime and manga articles
- Low-importance anime and manga articles
- All WikiProject Anime and manga pages
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class Japanese cinema articles
- Japanese cinema task force articles
- Start-Class Animated films articles
- Low-importance Animated films articles
- Animated films work group articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles