Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Aguilar (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dflaw4 (talk | contribs) at 09:31, 5 June 2020 (George Aguilar). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

George Aguilar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. Was not able to find an RS about him. Natg 19 (talk) 01:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 01:05, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 02:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I respectfully disagree, his role in the critically acclaimed Bagdad Café earned him a WP:NEntertainer. Moreover the article is not self promotional and sourced. The article should be kept and expanded. ≈Innovamus≈ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Innovamus (talkcontribs) 02:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC) Sorry I'm a new editor, still unfamiliar with signatures Innovamus (talk) 02:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)InnovamusInnovamus (talk) 02:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong delete The only coverage other than IMDb is the obituary of his son. This in no way shows notability. We deleted this article once, no reason to keep it on.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep: The subject has had enough main or supporting roles in notable films to pass WP:NACTOR, I think. I have applied at WP:RX for an article to be clipped; it appears to be an in-depth write-up dedicated to the subject. I'll post it here as soon as I can, and then I'll be able to give a more informed opinion vis-à-vis WP:GNG. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to allow time to collect sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 07:00, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Here is the write-up I referred to above, but I think it may be a different person: here. There are other sources, though (however, I'm not sure that they are as in-depth), and I'll post them here soon. Dflaw4 (talk) 09:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]