Jump to content

Talk:All Nippon Airways

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by David Biddulph (talk | contribs) at 10:23, 16 June 2020 (→Fleet: consensus & attribution). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

The Zodiac?

DID ANYONE ELSE SEE THE HACK OR SOME CRAZY BUG ON THIS PAGE? —Preceding unsigned comment added by RWorange (talk • contribs) 14:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pokemon jets

It says in the middle there are three pokemon coloured jets, but at the bottom it says four! Which is it? Mikeyd 17:16 12-09-04

  • i missed the Qty. of each aircraft typ!!, Def, June, 3rd, 2005

ANA Cargo merge discussion

There's really no reason to have a two sentence stub for ANA Cargo unless someone is going to expand it significantly. Otherwise, I think those two sentences should be merged into this article. ··· U sohuld merge those articles because ana cargo is insignigicant 日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How about the recent changes, say All Nippon Airways#Air Freights? Soredewa 08:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Luck!!

Should the ANA article include a reference to the Good Luck!! Japanese Drama TV series that prominently featured the airline? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Luck%21%21 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.150.113 (talk) 02:23, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Panda Jet...

You know... just before I boarded my flight... the livery seemed to be some pandas. I think that I took the Panda Jet itself from Singapore to Tokyo! --218.186.12.204 (talk) 10:18, 9 March 2009 (UTC) --Alexgan[reply]

Is this the former ANA HQ?

Potty

I add section which described in these links[1][2]. Because of my poor English, can you improve in article? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by B767-500 (talk • contribs) 21:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thx, titles added to the refs. SynergyStar (talk) 15:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://www.greenmuze.com/climate/travel/1643-pee-before-you-fly.html
  2. ^ http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/10/ana-wants-passengers-to-go-bef.html

Article improvements

I have reworked the article, edited prose, combined and expanded sections, etc. Photos have been updated. Citations have been added, and for several references where none could be found, the text has been excluded for now. These include the naming of the airline vs. JAL; Okinawa as int'l. destination, contracting with ground handling. Hopefully this makes the article more organized, informative, and interesting to read. Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 00:25, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hull loss at Sendai Airport's tsunami

I am sure that aircraft could not have escaped being rendered written off due to being submerged by the tsunami that followed the Tohoku Earthquake. I need a source. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inetpuppy (talk • contribs) 06:23, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peach

News articles about new LCC.

WhisperToMe (talk) 02:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flag Carrier

On this page written that ALL Nippon Airways is a flag carrier of Japan. But going by link to the 'flag carrier' article you can see that flag carrier of Japan actually is Japan Airlines(JAL). So who is flag carrier of Japan ?Mich39 (talk) 13:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:All Nippon Airways/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MrWooHoo (talk · contribs) 01:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this excellent article! I do my GA reviews with one main review then with prose and source reviews to make sure the article is suitable for GA status! Example: This GA --Cheers! Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon! 01:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Main Review

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. More will be covered in the prose review. From a glance it looks okay.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Lead is a good length, good layout, no weasel words, etc.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. All/most information is properly cited, however, according to this page ..."citations are also often discouraged in the lead section of an article, insofar as it summarizes information for which sources are given later in the article..."
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). Citations are good, no citations would be considered challengable.
2c. it contains no original research. Will check this in the source review
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Doesn't go into too much detail on anything specifically, it is covering the main aspects of ANA.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Good article size, good lead like I mentioned earlier.
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Not biased because it is an airline article anyways.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. No edit wars, conflict wars, etc. Good job!
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. This image may have an issue as the Pokemon themselves are copyright? You may have to remove this picture from the article. All other pictures are great!
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. The pictures are relevant to ANA and they are described correctly.
7. Overall assessment. See comments in the 2a and 6a rows. Also, see below for prose and source reviews.

Prose Review

Note: If you have changed the sentence that needed to be corrected, press Enter and start off the line with ::, then use checkY or  Done If the change was only partially done use checkY, and ☒N or  Not done if the change could not occur. (If you would explain why, I would be greatly appreciated :P) To see code, go to edit source and copy the code.

Source Review

Technically dead links don't have to be fixed in GA or FA but I'd think fixing them would help the article become better. Refs 3, 18, 23, 24, 39, 40, 51, 54, 57, 62, 71, 73, 80, 81, 89, 99, and 100 are all dead. If you have the time, you can delete these refs, update them, or delete them and delete the information these refs are cited with.

FYI: I will be passing the "sourcing" part of this GA because dead links are not required to be fixed according to this essay. Cheers! --Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon! 01:56, 17 April 2015 (UTC) https://naufalfz.my.id — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.0.138.189 (talk) 07:30, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Brandon (MrWooHoo), there's been no action here since you posted the above review on April 17. The nominator, whose name is now Kai Tak, has not edited on Wikipedia since March 15, so it seems unlikely there will be any response. Certainly, none of the edits in the interim by other editors have addressed the issues raised. Under the circumstances, you may want to close the nomination as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BlueMoonset, thank you. I haven't been on Wikipedia much recently due to school. I will be closing the review soon... --Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon! 20:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on All Nippon Airways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:22, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on All Nippon Airways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on All Nippon Airways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on All Nippon Airways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on All Nippon Airways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:55, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:All Nippon Airways/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==Reassessed as Start Class== Article needs attention to referencing - some major points have been left without references. Expansion also required in the Incidents section. Wexcan (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 16:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 07:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on All Nippon Airways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on All Nippon Airways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on All Nippon Airways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on All Nippon Airways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on All Nippon Airways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Skytrax awards

It has been known by many users (and readers) that skytrax awards and ratings are not neutral/questionable. I also noticed that most of airline articles in Wikipedia now have the skytrax awards sections completely removed. However in this article the skytrax awards section is still there and has not been updated since last year. Should we remove the skytrax awards section on All Nippon Airways? Naufal Praw (talk) 18:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.france24.com/en/20190129-japans-ana-order-30-boeing-18-airbus-planes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_African_Airways

speak to South African Airways about the mixed fleet

I think it would become a bureaucratic and logistical nightmare,

86.149.254.7 (talk) 07:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lead Section

"In addition to its mainline operations, ANA controls several subsidiary passenger carriers, including its regional airline, ANA Wings and contract flattop, Air Nippon. Supplementary pitifuller transmitters incorporate..."

"pitifuller transmitters"? "contract flattop"? These terms seem to have been grasped out of thin air.

Fleet

I want to remove all the content in the ANA fleet section by leaving the fleet summary because content already transferred need admin opinion or Extended confirmed users opinion Ktdk (talk) 01:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What you need is not "admin opinion or Extended confirmed users opinion" but consensus, and you also need to understand the need for attribution, see WP:Copying within Wikipedia. Have you read about splitting? --David Biddulph (talk) 10:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:All_Nippon_Airways&oldid=962849997"