Jump to content

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-26 Pioneer Courthouse Square

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Makaristos (talk | contribs) at 21:29, 26 December 2006 (Created page with '{{Medcabstatus <!-- Mediator, please change from new to open when accepted, to status closed when the case is closed. --> |status = new |article = |requestor = |p...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
Statusnew
Request dateUnknown
Requesting partyUnknown

[[Category:Wikipedia Mediation Cabal new cases|]][[Category:Wikipedia Mediation Cabal maintenance|]]

Mediation Case: Pioneer Courthouse Square

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.


Request Information

Request made by: Makaristos 21:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the issue taking place?
Pioneer Courthouse Square
Who's involved?
User:Makaristos, User:Pioneercourthouse, User:70.58.51.131
What's going on?
User:Pioneercourthouse keeps inserting controversial material into the article. This material also violates a number of guidelines, namely WP:NPOV, WP:WEASEL, WP:NOT, and WP:OR. Reversion of this material is fruitless because it is perpetually simply re-inserted without regard to WP:3RR or any sort of attempt at constructive dialogue.
What would you like to change about that?
Open a dialogue with this editor, and perhaps get him/her to realize that the material being inserted is inappropriate to Wikipedia. I am sick and tired of dealing with it myself, and the help pages and procedures are complicated and incomprehensible in points.
Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
No.

Mediator response

Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.

Discussion

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.