User talk:Scope creep

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chetan Sandesara (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chetan Sandesara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chetan Sandesara, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Scope creep! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judy Blank (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Judy Blank and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Judy Blank, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm North8000. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Çiçek Islands, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi @North8000: What is the reason exactly? They seem fairly decent, they do exist and are fair size. scope_creep^Talk 22:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

@Scope creep: Thanks for the ping. I think I made a mistake. I previously intended to have it as unreviewed, and then yesterday after the sources were added, I intended to change it to "reviewed". Maybe I made a mistake and did the opposite. I'll fix. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 19:30, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

@Scope creep: I just checked. It is (already) marked as reviewed. Maybe the bot misfired when it sent this message. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 19:37, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Luxmoore (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon Luxmoore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simon Luxmoore, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 02:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tsuki Adventure (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tsuki Adventure and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tsuki Adventure, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:40, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Karr O'Connor has been accepted

Joseph Karr O'Connor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Allenjambalaya (talk) 13:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Cahoone (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lawrence Cahoone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lawrence Cahoone, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:19, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Dvaitadvaita

Hi, this is regarding the copyright issue with Dvaitadvaita that you have raised. Actually I only created separate pages from existing Wikipedia page. So was there a copyright violation in the previous Wikipedia page Kumāra Sampradaya from which I copied the text? Would be glad to discuss this in the Kumāra Sampradaya talk page. Maybe we need to find out who authored the previous article. Thank you for raising the issue. (User talk:Madhav kiran sodum) —Preceding undated comment added 15:24, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Madhav kiran sodum: How are you keeping? I would restore it back to copyright tag that is on it. It still has a 96% copyvio score on Earwig:[1]. It doesn't matter where it has been copied from, it is still copyright text. I have reported it to the copyvio noticeboard at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2020 May 19 and User:Diannaa. They will deal with it. scope_creep^Talk 15:41, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Zoom H6 Handy Recorder

Greetings. No discussion page was created for this AfD. Page Curation seems to be especially buggy lately in this regard--I'd recommend sticking to Twinkle for AfD nominations. Thanks. --Finngall ^talk 17:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deejay Crim (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deejay Crim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deejay Crim, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 21:32, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, Scope creep

Thank you for creating Zawiya of Sidi Abd el-Aziz.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Google book reference exist.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 00:05, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Médéric Boquien (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Médéric Boquien and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Médéric Boquien, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 02:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Koren (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Koren and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gary Koren, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 02:59, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomba di Menotti Garibaldi (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomba di Menotti Garibaldi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tomba di Menotti Garibaldi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020 at Women in Red

Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169 Online events: New: Pride / United Nations / Geofocus on reducing gender imbalance Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

re: Rote Kapelle

In case you missed it on RDH: see Red Orchestra (espionage). 2601:648:8202:96B0:3567:50D5:8BFF:4588 (talk) 20:03, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi @2601:648:8202:96B0:3567:50D5:8BFF:4588:, What is RDH and how does it relate to the Red Orchestra? scope_creep^Talk 20:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

WP:RDH, the humanities refdesk where you asked for translation of a passage regarding the Rote Kapelle. 2601:648:8202:96B0:3567:50D5:8BFF:4588 (talk) 22:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

@2601:648:8202:96B0:3567:50D5:8BFF:4588:. I think I must be word blind sometimes. Yip ,I got that back. I put it in the article. Excellent translation it was as well. scope_creep^Talk 23:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Oh! I see you've done a lot of work on the Red Orchestra article--nice! I wonder about the translation "Red Chapel" in the first sentence though, especially since Jmar67 translated "Kapelle" as "band". I don't speak much German but see under Kapellmeister that the word also translates to choir or orchestra. I wonder if you think another WP:RDL query is warranted. 2601:648:8202:96B0:3567:50D5:8BFF:4588 (talk) 03:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

I think I have probably transcribed it wrong. The red orchestra was defined by the Gestapo as a choir, 'radio operators as pianists and their controllers as conductors. I've found various references to that fact, but couldn't locate the core person who defined it, or who said it, or when So in that respect, defining it as a band, is somewhat accurate. I would be happy if I could get a more accurate quote. There is several quotes on the the articles, that I would be more than happy if they were absolutely accurate idiomatic translations, with respect the person who stated it. That would be ideal actually. I think posting them all up there, would be ideal. I don't know if there is any more to go in. In respect to the article, it looks that way. A lot of structure has went in but a mountain of final details are still unknown. I found out recently the Perrault book I was relying on for historical analysis isn't particularly accurate, and takes old view. I'm still using it in parts. There is a newish French publication that seems to better. Lots still to do. scope_creep^Talk 09:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Oh that's interesting about the choir/pianists/etc. Way outside of my area though. I'm mostly a bit uncomfortable with the translation of "Kapelle" as "chapel" in a couple places in the article. Could you take a look at those and maybe change them, or alternatively perhaps ask a German speaker to give a verdict? 2601:648:8202:96B0:E9DB:C6D7:59AE:B46A (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

How come? I think that naming stuff was done before I arrived and it is well sourced. I think it is accurate. Is there a specific reason why you don't think it should be chapel?. There is several good source reference for that term.scope_creep^Talk 21:44, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

I'll post up the reference desk and see what they say. scope_creep^Talk 21:46, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

I've posted it as a word. Can you tell me where you think it needs changed, in a particular instance? Since you have brought it up, I plan to post all the quotes to the Reference desk, one after another, starting tomorrow. scope_creep^Talk 22:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

I posted it up to the Reference Desk. Can you please point out what you think needs to changed. I'm happy to take a look at it. The article still has a lot of work to do on it, so I'll here for next year or so. scope_creep^Talk 22:17, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

I saw your new RD thread, which looks good. If it were me I'd just remove the translations to "red chapel" and leave it at red orchestra. But, I'll defer to Jmar67. 2601:648:8202:96B0:A598:FF3D:8240:4E2B (talk) 01:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Yip, I plan to do it. I'm massively happy it has been caught. I'm also happy that somebody else is looking at the article. If you see anything else that is bothersome, inaccurate, or a bad translation, drop me a message right away, and I'll address it. scope_creep^Talk 07:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Maritime Venice has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maritime Venice. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 19:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Rouleauville has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rouleauville. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 19:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bromley Little Theatre (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bromley Little Theatre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bromley Little Theatre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maritime Venice has been accepted

Maritime Venice, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rouleauville (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rouleauville and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rouleauville, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 18:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yitu Technology (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yitu Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yitu Technology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Incidents#FloridaArmy_and_AfC_woes. Sulfurboy (talk) 04:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Katsiabanis has been accepted

Harry Katsiabanis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Shou-Chuan Lee has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shou-Chuan Lee. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 20:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Yury Ponomaryov has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yury Ponomaryov. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 22:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yury Ponomaryov has been accepted

Yury Ponomaryov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ymblanter (talk) 05:53, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

I reviewed the draft (for full disclosure, the author asked me to have a look at my talk page), and I do not see much issues. Whereas the main body of sources are in Russian, and some indeed only have passing mentions, there are enough of them for the guy to pass GNG.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Garth Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aberfeldy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

Speedy deletion of Hello Wood article

Dear scope_creep^Talk, I'm writing you because you nominated speedy deletion of an article created by me (Hello Wood). I ask you to cancel your speedy deletion. I see you flagged it as "promotional" but I rather see it as an encyclopedic content about an internationally acclaimed and awarded design studio. Both I and Hello Wood have Hungarian roots, but I tried to write the article without any bias. If any of my words, sentences seem promotional please advise me how to correct them or feel free to correct them yourself. I don't see why this article has to be removed.

Thanks, Littletkforyou

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Littletkforyou: The article is very promotional, reads like a native advertising, more so, brochure article per WP:NOTADVERTISING. You can contest it, by pressing the button, but I will need to send it to Afd. It is not written in an encyclopaedic manner, and the notability criteria, e.g. WP:NCORP are different from the Hungarian Wikipedia. I would make an attempt to clean the article up, make it more encyclopaedic and less promotional, if you want to save it. scope_creep^Talk

12:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

@Littletkforyou:, I just noticed it been deleted. If you want to try again, I would create it in the draft per [[[WP:DRAFT]]. scope_creep^Talk 12:48, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mary Barbera has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mary Barbera. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 18:54, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

An European artist draft

Hi, Scope creep as per information at WP:AFC/RBS, I would like to draw your attention to Draft:Pieter De Bruyne which you might be interested to review. Thank you. ~ Amkgp ✉ 06:23, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi,Scope creep, you left a comment about inline citations in de article Draft:Pieter De Bruyne i added some. Can you check it out pls. thx 2A02:1812:1C20:2300:892E:B2A2:24CD:3E72 (talk) 17:23, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi @A02:1812:1C20:2300:892E:B2A2:24CD:3E72 and 2A02:1812:1C20:2300:892E:B2A2:24CD:3E72:. See when you edit a page, at the top, list of dialog's. On the left, it say says template, so e.g. if you want to cite books, click the drop down and click on cite book. Once the dialog comes, just fill details, click ok, and creates the reference for you. The article is getting better, but whole sections are not referenced. Aim for about at least 8 references. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 17:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi,Scope creep, thank you for your help. I ve added 10 references.

@A02:1812:1C20:2300:892E:B2A2:24CD:3E72:, Can you use this ~~~~, to sign your comments. Solid effort, but you have missed the authors names. You can go something like for cite book, last1= first1= for first and last name, {{cite book |last1=Bloggs |first1=Joe |last2=Egg, or you go like {{cite book |author1=Bloggs, Joe |author2=Egg, Joe . Are you up for doing it. The referencing are decent apart from that. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 20:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Article moved

Hi, I moved User Scope creep/Sandbox B21 from mainspace to your userspace. Schazjmd (talk) 14:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Schazjmd: Thanks for that. I thought I'd created it correctly this time, but obviously not. I'll need to create properly or start with a draft page, or read the manual. It seems to work, when do I'm doing archives in my talk page. scope_creep^Talk 14:38, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Scope creep, you just forgot the : between User and Scope. Schazjmd (talk) 18:47, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Pruthvi Ambaar

Hello Scope creep. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Pruthvi Ambaar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: there's considerably more sources than there were when it was nominated last time. This needs to go back to AfD. Thank you. GedUK  07:11, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Orchestra (espionage), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint-Gilles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Scottish island settlements

Since you have participated in creating articles on Scottish island settlements and dealing with drafts I have started drafts at Draft:Kinloch, Rùm, Draft:Lagg, Jura, Draft:Cullipool and Draft:Tarbert, Jura. I'm not sure if these meet the inclusion criteria but I'm wandering if you have any more info for them, thanks. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello @Crouch, Swale:. How are you? I'll take a look at them. scope_creep^Talk 21:27, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

The consensus is there is must be more than 10 houses, then it is Hamlet, and its notable. They are very short. What about adding stuff, local geography, maybe there is a Monroe nearby, although it is pretty flat in Rum. Lochs, which I'm doing, walks and tourist stuff, would be ideal to pad it out. Draft:Lagg, Jura isn't notable. It only three crofts. scope_creep^Talk 22:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Tarbert, Jura is also non-notable. It also has only three crofts. scope_creep^Talk 22:55, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, I've expanded a little, although Lagg now only has 3 or 4 houses it once had a population of 70 (as I have now added) and the OS classifies it as a settlement and its even on the A-Z Mini though in Scotland that does show quite a few non OS settlements. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

They were all cleared out with highland clearances and everybody moved to the coast, over very long period. When doing the List of places in Highland (council area), there was a huge number of places, that looked like villages on Google maps, described in various books and maps Some still had houses, although just walls, and they were all over the place. A lot of them have 1 or 2 houses, but they are still recorded a village or settlement or a hamlet. Sometimes they were planned villages, or a hunting lodge or an estate, that looks like a village, like the e.g. estate outside Ullapool, but they must have 10 houses. I wouldn't spend too much time on it, as somebody will delete it. scope_creep^Talk 18:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Well places can still be notable even if they've been cleared as long as there is still coverage on them, the only discussion I can see on this is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland/Archive 10#Notability of small places where there doesn't appear to be consensus over the number of houses. Crouch, Swale (talk) 07:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

@Crouch, Swale: Well done for finding that. It is a good point you have brought up. I think that is possibly, the first discussion, it is a while ago. Coverage might make a difference. Lets see what @Ben MacDui: has to say on it. scope_creep^Talk 08:26, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

First of all, well done for finding that discussion. I recall the sense of frustration well! As I remember it the thrust of the argument was "there are lots of places that are very small now but at least some of them have an interesting history that could be fleshed out" vs "why clutter the place up with articles that say next to nothing and have little hope of every doing so, they are little more than an expression of the obvious, why not just have a list?". I doubt that much has changed since then save that I think it is clear that over the years small new articles continue to be created at a rate that is faster than our collective ability or inclination to turn those that have some prospect of improvement into something of substance. From my perspective there is little point in grumbling about this and I don't see that it causes any harm provided everything is accurate, not subject to vandalism (a lot of them must be unwatched) and accurately categorised. (As an aside its amazing the number of red links for the cats that were discussed back then.) I don't know if that's helpful. The best way to get info about substantially cleared villages may be either from local history books or maybe the Statistical Accounts of Scotland, Canmore etc. I have very little such material to hand and the Gazetteer for Scotland does not seem to have added much new for a wee while. In short, I tend not to write much about settlements as such & I am more mellow than a decade ago and don't see a genuine problem with very small places if people are inspired to write about them. If it was me, writing about say Cullipool, at minimum I'd want to add at least one para that might make people think e.g. culled from this rather poignant press piece: "Luing recalls tragedy that claimed sailors". {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help) from The Oban Times but that's just me. Ben MacDui 09:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC) PS I am in shock - that's what you get for taking some time off I suppose. If I can be bothered I might start a convo somewhere that attempts to get some kind of clear policy for Scottish island names.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Barbera (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MapleSoy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary Barbera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mary Barbera, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 03:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Pieter Pourbus

Hi again,
Since I see you are an art lover, would you accept reviewing this article on Pieter Pourbus I have enriched and worked on a lot?
There are still mainly 2 types of issues:
1/ sources in some paragraphs: I am working on these points ( I have all literature available in my library).
2/ pure editing in a good (but not too basic) English (if you have time and patience, please read [the dialogue with another editor], who admitted he has no knowledge in art history, and accepted I revert some of his own edits)
I have worked on purpose on the images, so that their size give at first sight an impression of the real size of the actual painting; and also so that the description sticks to standards art historians currently use (it is also more encyclopaedic). And will continue to check some who lack this kind of edit yet.
Will be glad to have your news, and help.
Have a good day!
--Emigré55 (talk) 10:25, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bernard Manyenyeni has been accepted

Bernard Manyenyeni, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lapablo (talk) 16:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barman Thar (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barman Thar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Barman Thar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JavaHurricane 13:39, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Loch naming updates and location field

I'm loving the amount of Loch articles you've created, some naming updates to provide consistency across bodies of water is under way with guidelines outlined at WikiProject Lakes name (region) format is suggested for disambiguation, feel free to add yourself as a member and help shape the direction since you seem to have an overlap in interest. Help us track these by adding {{WikiProject Lakes}} to the talk page. There are a number of lochs on the list of lochs of Scotland needing renaming for consistency which helps to disambiguate from any settlement. I understand terms matter which is why I added lochs explicitly as scope for the project as loch vs lake was talked about in the page history as being important. Also the body of water location field doesn't seem the right place for the templates of "NO175427" according the doc of the infobox this should be city or other region. It would be preferable that the British Grid be a separate parameter rather than conflated in the location field which has no context for those who do not live within the system. What do you say we join forces and move forward with consistency of bodies of water on Wikipedia together? Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 09:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Wolfgang8741: How are you? I noticed this morning, that this was on the go. There is a List of lochs of Scotland list which I was working to. Right, you have that article. I've just updated location property this morning, so needs updated again I guess. It would be ideal if another property could identified. I figured at some point, a gnome would come in and move it. To be honest I didn't know what field it needed to be in. If you can point in a direction, I will change it, as I go. I'll do that. That sounds good. I'm glad somebody else was looking at it as well.scope_creep^Talk 12:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

@Scope creep: I'm having a good day, thank you. Glad to have a prompt response. My proposal is to currently have the grid code in the article body until a field can be identified as there isn't an applicable field in the infobox for it at this time really given its regional scope of use. The place to propose and discuss a new parameter or method of handling would probably best take place on Template_talk:Infobox_body_of_water. Lets discuss how best to handle the info there and get input from others in the project. I have not yet reached the point of writing checks for properties, but slowly am working to clean up the project docs first with practices and the tackling the existing backlogs first. The location field does not yet have a maintenance category or technical constraint only the description on the template doc so the need for this update may not be visible to the project a while. Otherwise I ran over the list and update the other names I could find. If you check out the project and see anything that diverges from the needs of lochs please let us know. Thanks. Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 15:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

That is not the ideal solution, having machine data identifiers in text. There proper place in an infobox. We should kick off a proposal to get a new field, as soon as possible. I'm surprised its not been looked at in the past, perhaps its been lost in translation somehow. Funny, looking at the archive 3, I posted a note on 13 May 2018 to request a new field, and nothing came of it. I don't known the mechanism to get a change happening, outwith creating a new template, specific to Scottish lochs, which a new field OS Grid. I don't think anybody is looking at that template. Who owns that template? I think its pretty low in everybody priority list. They don't see a need for a maintenance category, when there is so much needed done elsewhere. I'll join your project. scope_creep^Talk 15:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Pieter Pourbus

Hi @Emigré55: I managed to look at the above article There are several section that have been expanded and not be cited at all. It needs additional references in those section. If you need a hand, give me a shout. The article subject is eminently notable. Well done for updating it. The next task is to reference it. scope_creep^Talk 16:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andriy Zayats (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SS49 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andriy Zayats and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andriy Zayats, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~SS49~ {talk} 13:59, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020

Hello Scope creep,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

• A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
• Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
• A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
• Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Loch Benachally for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loch Benachally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loch Benachally until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Stop biting the newbie (talk) 03:30, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Renuar

I brought sources that the group is 5th place in the Israeli fashion sector, I brought a source worth over $ 100 million, I brought a source that it has 170 branches in Israel I brought a source that the most successful models in Israel - Moran Atias and Bar Refaeli have been the representative of the company for years.

What other sources do you need? Bar (talk) 04:15, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Bar Having two models representing the company doesn't make it notable. Almost all large companies have celebrates and government officials as advisors of one kind of another. It is the depth o

f sources, I don't sufficient to show it is notable. With 170 stores it should be notable but I cant see a lot. scope_creep^Talk 08:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magnus Smith has been accepted

Magnus Smith, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 19:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Many thanks for reviewing The Stonemason (book); much appreciated. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 20:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Onnie Lee Logan (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Onnie Lee Logan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Onnie Lee Logan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:54, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sylvie Weil (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sylvie Weil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sylvie Weil, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:49, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maila Paloheimo (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MapleSoy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maila Paloheimo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Maila Paloheimo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 20:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Dan Wagner

This is part of a serial mass deletion campaign and nothing new based on the message I left on the user's talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Questions re notability

Hey! Thank you so much for your work reviewing so many articles :) I was wondering if you might be able to join in the deletion discussion of this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayana_Jordan. Based on notability criteria, she appears to meet them but I am getting pushback and would like more eyes on this deletion discussion. If you have time, I would really appreciate it. Microglia145 (talk) 20:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

@CMicroglia145: I'm sorry, but I think she is probably non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 22:06, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Ms Cullors

Wikipedia is supposed to be a learning environment, not a propaganda page. Ms Cullors is an admited Marxist in her own words and it is relevant to inform readers of her page. Signed by user:Truthtrain by scope_creep^Talk 22:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

@Truthtrain: Who is Ms Cullors exactly? 22:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: June Yvonne Clarke has been accepted

June Yvonne Clarke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 08:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brenda Namumba (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brenda Namumba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brenda Namumba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 08:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Re: Derek Yellon

Hi thanks for the message. Googlescholar was indeed checked, but you realise beyond citations there's very little qualifying this academic as a notable Prof- meriting a Wikipedia article. I have no idea what H-score is, but my impression is if we use citation metrics as Wikipedia level notability, I suspect we'd be creating articles for all Ivy league professors. That plus the article seemed to be a self-promoting article by himself or his staff. Dudewheresmywallet (talk) 11:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Dudewheresmywallet: Generally speaking a full professor at a regular university is notable. We will be creating articles for all Ivy League professors. By their very nature, they are the top of their notability tree. If they are mentioned on a university site, then they are notable, by default. They are not professors for nothing. At the bottom of the notability tree are graphic artists, bit-part actors, tat artists, part-time models, pornographers, which are very hard to verify as being notable. If you find it to be promotional, cut it out. Nobody wants WP:PUFF in an article, just cut it out. The h-index is a metric that used on Google Scholar to provide a measure of how good the research for a particular person. Those in hard stem subjects tend to be above 20-25. The highest I've seen is about 170. Some kind of alien god likely. That combined with citations that each paper has is a good indication of notability. If you see low h-index and 4 or 5 papers with more than 100 cites then they are notable. Many other academics don't place on the h-index table, for obvious reasons. People like social scientists, ethnographers, physicians, geographers, in soft subject, people like that, to some extent. You must search to see who there and them make a judgement. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 11:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

I don't see puff in that article. It is just stating what he does. scope_creep^Talk 11:54, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Take a look at this article:Randolph Cohen. It has had about, well about a 1/3 of it taken out. It was full of WP:PUFF. scope_creep^Talk 11:56, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

@Dudewheresmywallet: Why not stick around and create some new articles. Those are excellent you wrote. scope_creep^Talk 11:59, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheyene Gerardi Foundation (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sheyene Gerardi Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sheyene Gerardi Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uploadcare (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uploadcare and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uploadcare, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Toswo

Hello dear Scope_creep. Can you help remove the "Delete Tag"? toswo Mrloopitus (talk) 19:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Mrloopitus: That way to do it, is to find good secondary sources, that are user-generated company news or branding or advertising. Find somebody that is talking about them who is not related to the company itself. scope_creep^Talk 09:37, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Question on Solid-state electrolyte page

Hi, I've seen you suggest the page I've written Solid-state electrolyte doesn't follow the tone or style of Wikipedia. Could you please give me some practical examples on what is wrong and how to improve the page? Thanks --Sikko94 (talk) 09:22, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Sikko94: One a scale of 1 to 60 it is probably about 12, but I saw a couple of It is gaining a lot of interest are also widely used, widen the possible applications. Your not selling it, hopefully. Its needs a wee bit trimmed. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 09:34, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi again @Scope creep:, thanks for the reply. I've revised the Solid-state electrolyte article following your suggestion, what do you think?

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philip Robert Odegard (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Philip Robert Odegard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Philip Robert Odegard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiAviator (talk) 10:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

YGM

Hello, Scope creep. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

. I like to keep communication on Wikipedia, but this involves information from outside of Wikipedia.--Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉]) 10:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Andre Waismann has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Andre Waismann. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 12:34, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Timothy Todd Anderson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Timothy Todd Anderson. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 13:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020 at Women in Red

Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173 Online events: New: July Julies / Disability / Women from Where? ... and starting for an extended period: BLM/Anti-discrimination Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Red Orchestra

I don't have the time right now to plow through the article to find the parts that made me stumble and re-read. But as a starter, there is "h the Gestapo, was i" - the subject is separated from the predicate by a comma. That's not an example of being turgid, but it does make for difficult reading. I'll try to find time later to get more examples. Kdammers (talk) 16:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

@Kdammers: Dude, your talking about grammar. I thought you were talking about content. My grammar is atrocious, I know that for sure. I rely on the Gnomish folk to do that work. The article is not finished by a long way, but if you want to have a go improving what's there, please crack on. scope_creep^Talk 16:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Ingratis. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Monastery of Vallbona de les Monjas, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ingratis (talk) 22:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello Scope Creep

	Hello Scope Creep
	Thank-you for the suggestion, however if i were to expand the Macedonian Hussar Regiment article Jingiby would delete the information. You could possibly help me. Jingiby thinks i am a sockpuppet of a previous user. However i have only had two accounts, this is my second wikipedia account. Regards Kajmakcalan (talk) 14:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Request on 21:52:26, 1 July 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Movidatabase

• Movidatabase (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Luciano Francesco Silighini Garagnani Lambertini (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Movidatabase (talk) 21:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC) Hi I have provided links and a lot of information about a famous Italian director. I ask for it to be published

AfC notification: Draft:I Wrote This For You has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:I Wrote This For You. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 00:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: I Wrote This For You (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:I Wrote This For You and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:I Wrote This For You, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiAviator (talk) 03:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Claire Deluca has been accepted

Claire Deluca, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 10:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stuart Haselden (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Loksmythe was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stuart Haselden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stuart Haselden, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Loksmythe (talk) 15:11, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Pink references

Hi Scope creep! I saw you added a tag for cleanup on Destiny Rogers. I am just a bit confused on the tag, since it says there are references in pink. What does that mean exactly? Thanks! --Divine618 (talk) 15:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello @Divine618: The software now tags certain reference in pink, e.g the first one, if they are considered low quality. I was told them should be removed as part of WP:NPP review. In total in the article, they are ref 1, 4, 6 and ref 15 are low-quality sources or more accurately considered low-quality sources. I'm assuming you can see the pink tinge on the reference itself. For Ref 1, the tooltip says, "generally unreliable source". Say the same thing about Ref 4. I would remove them, if your up for it. I don't intend to use tagging method again, as it seems cause confusion.scope_creep^Talk 16:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Okay thank you for the feedback. I can definitely try to remove/update these sources. However, I am not able to see any pink color on the sources or any analysis of the sources. Do I have to have this software installed to see them? Or should I be able to see it just as a normal editor? --Divine618 (talk) 16:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Divine618, I think it clear now, that only I can see them and the folk from the NPP/AFC group, I assume. Thanks for getting back to me. I thought everybody would see it. I guess it is a case me doing the work from now on. I'll do for you. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 16:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Ava Bahram

Hello, I was writing and completing an article called Ava Bahram that has been deleted by you. Please revive the article on my home page. I want to edit and complete the article. Regards Gimbouri (talk) 19:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Gimbouri: I'm not an administrator, so I'm not capable of deleting or undeleting articles. According the logs, the article was created twice and deleted twice, [[2]] and is unlikely to be undeleted. You can try to find an administrator who will maybe undelete it, I don't know. However, the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ava Bahram was for clear delete. If I see it posted and its still badly referenced, I will nominate it for deletion and it will salted. scope_creep^Talk 20:02, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Camilo Prieto

Hi Scope Creep: I have made several changes to Camilo Prieto Valderrama's article, as he is a leading environmentalist in Colombia with books and awards. I think it deserves a Wikipedia entry. I hope the article is more appropriate now. Anyway, I'm going to ask for help to keep it. Thank you for your participation in improving Wikipedia.--3erres (talk) 16:11, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

@3erres: I will take a look at the references you when your finished. So far it is not notable. Interviews aren't high quality references, and there need more than just doing his job. scope_creep^Talk 16:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello ::@Scope creep:, He has several books published and is quite popular on Colombian television, in addition to having received important awards in his country. He is also an outstanding activist--3erres (talk) 17:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

RE: DEREK YELLON

Thankyou for your kind comments. Please see WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability (academics)) and you will see patently that this profile falls way short of WP: notability. It will also be noted that h-index that you mentioned has been mentioned below in the article, but the use of a citation metric alone is problematic in deeming an academic notable is highly questionable. I have not yet undone the edit you made, but have written to you here to highlight the reason this is a non-notable academic as far as WP is concerned. The WP:PUFF side if things we have touched upon already.Dudewheresmywallet (talk) 12:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)