This page is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Cake and cunnilingus day
Hello ,
I am not an editor, actually i dont know how to edit here.
There's no any article about the subject above , while there's one , steak and bj day, that is, that seems very old , despite the deletion nominations.
Why ?
I wish i could create one but i cant. In my opinion ,the fact that there's only the one side presented here ,might give the 'wrong' message to young people and of course could make Wikipedia look unreliable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgeof1001 (talk • contribs) 20:48, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@EvergreenFir: Thank you! Yes, it is a well known Holiday , in Europe mostly, not less reliable sources from other Wiki artiles, like MSN, Bild, and many others. With a quick google search , one can find endless references from known media, still , it's a surprise that there is no article yet here.Georgeof1001 (talk) 17:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I can't say I've heard of it before. A google search brings up lots of results, but most are not what would be considered reliable sources. However, there are probably enough RS's to back up an article. You could also argue that for the sake of equality on WP, we need the article to balance Steak and Blowjob Day. --John B123 (talk) 17:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly ! We need the article to balance Steak and bj day.I was hoping to get some help or prompt editors to create it. There are many reliable sources out there , actually more sources than steak and bj had about when it was created. Georgeof1001 (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Would someone please check the spate of edits to these two articles by newish editor Buzinezz? I'm not sure what to make of them. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:04, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Beyond My Ken: Hi. I've had a look and can't find anything wrong with the edits per se. However, both articles are unbalanced in regard to coverage, some countries having detailed content and others only a couple of lines, and Buzinezz's edits are adding to this imbalance. Regards --John B123 (talk) 11:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why not just try reading the first sentence of Rape? And maybe then read on for extra clarity. And then read Sexual consent. What do you actually mean by 'mutual sex' and what specifically is the area of coverage you feel we are missing? Nick Moyes (talk) 09:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
i found an image that is not good or healthy for teenagers / biology students/otherRavinesh rds (talk) 11:57, 16 July 2020 (UTC)Ravinesh rdsRavinesh rds (talk) 11:57, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
this is ravinesh rds gmt 11:53
the image is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Femdom_at_Eros_Pyramide.jpg including two people doing inappropriate act . in the page of wikipedia censorship there is written that wikipedia is not censored but we don't use images of sex instead of we use 20 th century paintings or animated but not actual images which are actually part of pornography. wikipedia is an encyclopedia it must not be like other bad sites which show this. please think maturely about the impact of it on >18 age group as there are millions of those users all over the world using wikipedia .in my opinion you must replace it by either a painting or an animation so that it may not impact the visitors as well as the topic of the page. thank you
Hello revinesh. It is not required, but I encourage you to create your own Wikipedia account as it makes so many tasks much easier. (I see now that you in fact do have an account. My bad.) ¶ I doubt the image in question harms adolescents, particularly since it is included in the context of encyclopedia articles, Dominatrix, Master/slave (BDSM), and Sex show. ¶ At the same time, on Wikipedia it is certainly appropriate and legitimate to discuss whether or not an image should be used for an article. Relevant Wikipedia policies include Offensive images and Offensive material ("Wikipedia articles may contain offensive words and images, but only for a good reason"), including "Not censored" does not give special favor to offensive content. I am not personally offended by the image in question, but one editor's experience is not what's important. From Offensive images:
... a potentially offensive image—one that would be considered vulgar or obscene by typical Wikipedia readers[nb 1]—should be included only if it is treated in an encyclopedic manner i.e. only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternative is available. ¶ Note 1. Here a "typical Wikipedia reader" is defined by the cultural beliefs of the majority of the website readers (not active editors) that are literate in an article's language. Clarifying this viewpoint may require a broad spectrum of input and discussion, as cultural views can differ widely.
.svg){kind=small}
