Talk:Giant Bomb

Giant Bomb was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 1, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed
February 20, 2016	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

TheoTown (5 participants)
Redout (video game) (10 participants)
Old Grandma Hardcore (4 participants)
CarX Street (5 participants)
WePlay AniMajor (1 participant)
İstanbul Efsaneleri: Lale Savaşçıları (2 participants)
Zero Hour (video game) (4 participants; relisted)
VoxelStorm (1 participant; relisted)
Gilman Louie (4 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Sun Haven

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Websites: Computing C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

http://www.vice.com/read/how-games-website-giant-bomb-bounced-back-from-the-death-of-its-founding-editor-123

Ryan Davis (video game journalist) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 28 July 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Giant Bomb. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

GA/A/FA status

I'm pretty much done adding to this wiki for now. The only upcoming addition, barring any significant developments in the future, is when Giant Bomb announce who they hire to replace Patrick Klepek as Senior News Editor. Should be a sentence in the History section and a new row in the Employees table, nothing more.

This wiki was rated B-class back in 2011, I think it's time we got the ball rolling on what needs to be done to get to GA/A/FA class. Here's the GA criteria and the FA criteria.

User Cyberbulb099 has already begun, they judged that the Usage section was not needed. Are we in agreement? Any other suggestions? --FLStyle (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giant Bomb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110116042603/http://www.giantbomb.com/features/best-of-2008/1/?category=1 to http://www.giantbomb.com/features/best-of-2008/1/?category=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Alex Navarro" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Alex Navarro. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 25#Alex Navarro until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Strangerpete (talk) 11:33, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]