User talk:MysticMoment

MysticMoment, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MysticMoment! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
8	Declan McAleer (talk)	Add sources
8	John Sweetman (talk)	Add sources
7	Tony Magan (talk)	Add sources
52	Seán Lynch (politician) (talk)	Add sources
24	Edward Martyn (talk)	Add sources
16	Gregory Reyes (talk)	Add sources
103	Marc Dreier (talk)	Cleanup
161	Non-coding RNA (talk)	Cleanup
68	Circular RNA (talk)	Cleanup
108	Disappeared (Northern Ireland) (talk)	Expand
644	Democratic Unionist Party (talk)	Expand
36	Cross-community vote (talk)	Expand
14	Battle of Kilmallock (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,477	Sinn Féin (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
6	Brook's Club bombing (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
178	Provisional Irish Republican Army campaign (talk)	Merge
16	Provisional IRA's Glasgow cell (talk)	Merge
644	Government of the 33rd Dáil (talk)	Merge
64	Irish Republican Army–Abwehr collaboration (talk)	Wikify
2	MicroRNA 7-2 (talk)	Wikify
39	Health in the United Kingdom (talk)	Wikify
2	MicroRNA 548v (talk)	Orphan
2	MicroRNA 5680 (talk)	Orphan
2	MicroRNA 486-1 (talk)	Orphan
20	Dawn Doyle (talk)	Stub
2	MicroRNA 6850 (talk)	Stub
11	Karen Mullan (talk)	Stub
2	MicroRNA 4521 (talk)	Stub
11	Catherine Kelly (talk)	Stub
16	Colm Gildernew (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:28, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teddywidder (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Teddywidder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Teddywidder, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 11:48, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicole Zitzmann (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheImaCow was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicole Zitzmann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nicole Zitzmann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 14:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin W. Taylor has been accepted

Edwin W. Taylor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 09:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]