This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
It is requested that a photograph of Jane Hogarth be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.
Although there have been claims that the article is a copyright violation of [1], this isn't true. I can provide the article via email if someone wants to double check the claim. Sam-2727 (talk) 05:11, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Montanabw, Sam-2727, I've looked briefly at this, and the complaint does seem to have some little merit (NB, Earwig does not have access to www.oxforddnb.com, but I do). As an example, if the source reads "in 1988, when the copyrights to Peter Pan were given in perpetuity to the Great Ormond Street Hospital", then our article certainly should not read "in 1988, when the copyrights to Peter Pan were given to the Great Ormond Street Hospital in perpetuity" – fiddling with the order of a couple of phrases does not constitute writing new content entirely in your own words, which is what we should be doing. But this is mostly a matter of close following rather than outright copyvio. Antiqueight, would you be prepared to rewrite the page to address these fairly minor problems? If so, I'll provide info on how and where to do that.
I’m not Sam, but looks like it’s otrs:11454772. Might be nighttime where Antiqueight is at, so may not hear back until tomorrow...we can all work together to fix this, perhaps. Can you create the page where we put in the text to revise it? My help will mostly be wordsmithing, as I don’t want to get into the sources. Montanabw(talk)20:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Justlettersandnumbers I have no problem rewriting the page - I know sometimes when I'm working on various bios I get to the stage where I can't tell what I've rewritten and not rewritten, and sometimes I just can't think of another way to say it. I usually check with Earwig and didn't think about the fact that it might not have access. The Ticket is [2]. I'm not certain though how to go about rewriting the page when it's all taken over by the template. I didn't want to touch it til I knew what I was supposed to do about it. ☕ Antiqueightchatter20:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]