Jump to content

Talk:Chorioamnionitis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CAngerman (talk | contribs) at 20:31, 3 August 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconMedicine: Pathology Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by the Pathology task force (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconWomen's Health Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 June 2020 and 21 August 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): I. Ly, UCSF, B. Hyland 17, Sydney Martinelli, Richard.Ishimaru (article contribs).

Chorioamnionitis is a fetal disease. I'd like the opening sentence to reflect that. Any takers? Hovea 05:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys. This article needs a lot of work. I am going to try to completely re-vamp it. I hope that doesn't offend anybody. I will of course keep it 100% evidenced based. Thanks so much. Majahops (talk) 19:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC) Tim[reply]


8/3/20 Peer Review - By Group 1

Ureaplasma

doi:10.1128/CMR.00091-16 JFW | T@lk 23:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Foundations II 2020 Group 2 proposed edits

  1. Reformat the article to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards
  2. Ensure proper citation of sources/update sources
  3. Possibly add sections for microbiology, incidence, neonatal outcomes, prevention, and risk factors

I. Ly, UCSF (talk) 20:55, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I. Ly, UCSF and the rest of Group 2. Welcome! These sound like good goals for the article. I'll try to keep an eye on this talk page, so if you have questions about Wikipedia norms as you get to editing, feel free to ask me here (if I'm being slow to reply, you can post at my talk page). A suggestion: it's sometimes hard to tell what sections an article should have, and what order would help the information flow well. After some discussion in the distant past, several medical editors wrote out a trusty manual for organizing medicine-related articles. For articles related to a disease/syndrome, we recommend (n.b. it's not a requirement; just a suggestion) that you consider the sections listed here. Hopefully the suggestion helps you see where the article is missing information now. It's great to see new editors interested in medicine-related articles! I hope you all decide to stick around. Best, Ajpolino (talk) 21:24, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for pointing out the guide for organizing medicine-related articles! Very helpful, we will generally try to follow these section headings. We appreciate having your eyes on the page as well. B. Hyland 17 (talk) 17:43, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]