Jump to content

User talk:Benjaminfreyart

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Benjaminfreyart (talk | contribs) at 17:27, 20 August 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Benjaminfreyart, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GMGtalk 12:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Benjaminfreyart. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Ancient Greek cuisine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Macedonia
Millet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Macedonia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

it's → its

Please note my recent corrections to Abraham Peyrenc de Moras. The word its is the possessive whereas the word it's is a contraction of it is. Just trying to eliminate future errors. Thanks for all you do for WP! --LilHelpa (talk) 13:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Abraham Peyrenc de Moras

Hello, Benjaminfreyart,

Thanks for creating Abraham Peyrenc de Moras! I edit here too, under the username Hydronium Hydroxide and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thanks for the translation. Tagged for tone and citation style -- my guess is that both are a result of liberal use of de Lordat's bio for the original article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hydronium Hydroxide}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 10:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Megalith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capstone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carrot cake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Icing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Chiropractic‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly (talk) 17:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I published a fully referenced change to the lede on that page, with government websites as the source describing the profession as being “licensed” and two other editors are insisting that the references and word be removed. I will stop trying to improve this article since it is obvious that there are people radically beholden to their POV and rabidly against the article being neutral frey (talk) 17:27, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]