Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Debraannclark (talk | contribs) at 15:46, 21 August 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests to unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests to unprotect, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

    This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

    Shortcuts

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases. The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). Be clear as to which namespace is intended, when requesting a refund of a deleted article.

    This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.

    Do not request that pages or media deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

    Instructions for special cases:

    Enter the page's title:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion


    Scout's Oath (film) and File:Scout’s Oath screenshot.jpg

    I have redone the article from the old information, I beefed it up, and the new text is here: User talk:Evrik/draft4. Lanzi's firing was a big issue in the Scouting community and may have partially led to the BSA eventually changing their position on LGBT people. Please restore the article and the image. I can add the new text. --evrik (talk) 15:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:NotesOfASonAndBrother.jpg

    Relicensed, undeletion of revisions needed for export to Commons. —– Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Bonifacio Global City Logo.png

    Deleted under WP:F5, but it was likely covered under {{PD-textlogo}}. File:BGC Taguig logo.svg, which claims to be based on it, is licensed under {{PD-textlogo}} but I feel weird about moving it to Commons without also moving the file that it was based on for attribution reasons. —Nathan2055talk - contribs 00:19, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Family Radio 2017 logo.svg

    Marked as public domain, requesting undeletion of older revisions so it can be copied to Commons. —Nathan2055talk - contribs 00:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Machind.jpg

    Image is in the public domain under UK copyright law, requesting undeletion of previous revisions so it can be moved to Commons. —Nathan2055talk - contribs 00:38, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:National_Organization_of_Sea_Scout_Alumni

    I, Wwwscrptr, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wwwscrptr (talk) 03:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!.

    @Wwwscrptr: Please make sure to work on the draft and submit it. —C.Fred (talk) 17:33, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Richard Marshall (barber)

    I, Thedavidshow, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thedavidshow (talk) 04:49, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Thedavidshow: This would be the third time this draft has been undeleted. Are you going to actually work on it? —C.Fred (talk) 17:34, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @C.Fred: Yes. I intend to give it one final shot. I was unable to do so the last undelete due to A. The unrolling of a global pandemic and B. lack of credible new information from primary sources. I've got my pandemic response pretty much under control now and there is some new, credible information. If my article isn't accepted this time then I'll probably move on to something else.

    --Thedavidshow (talk) 04:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:R.I.E

    I, Jerryaguire, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jerryaguire (talk) 08:36, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    I have gathered more information on the topic at hand and would like to add it to the page and will continue to do so in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerryaguire (talk • contribs) 08:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jerryaguire the restored draft seems to cite no independent sources at all. Please be sure to add such sources with significant coverage before re-submitting. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:38, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:This Is Love (The Archies album)

    I, Jhlechner, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jhlechner (talk) 15:11, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    I'm afraid I only just saw the messages asking me to finish the page. Honestly, I thought I had published it! Please restore the page, and I will make sure that it is finished and published. —Jhlechner (talk) 15:12, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. When you are ready for it to be reviewed, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!.
    @Jhlechner: Please make sure to follow the directions for submitting the draft when you're done...although in its current condition, the draft would not meet the notability criteria for inclusion in the main encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 17:37, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Category:Villages in Aberdeen

    I contested the deletion on the talk page due to the fact that I do think that there are places classified as villages in Aberdeen (per sources) see the discussion at Talk:Cults, Aberdeen#Village or Suburb. There is also a discussion on if categories can be emptied at Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion#Where does it actually say you should not just empty a category you don't like? so I suggest restoring the members and the IP can start a full CFD if deletion is still desired. I asked the deleting admin on the 1st but haven't had a response, see User talk:Liz#Category:Villages in Aberdeen. —Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:25, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Densha de Go! (video game)

    I, Namcokid47, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 21:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Namcokid47: DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 23:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Populism in Europe

    I, Emir of Wikipedia, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:04, 15 August 2020 (UTC) (please Reply to icon mention me on reply; thanks!)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Emir of Wikipedia DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 14:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Julian Gaertner

    I, BettyKong, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BettyKong (talk) 15:42, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    the page should be published. the artist has a lot of references in Chinese Media and Wikipedia - I will edit the draft to follow the standards "Publish changes" button below —BettyKong (talk) 15:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. BettyKong, this is the second time this has been restored after a G13 deletion, and the most recent version has no hint of any reason why Gaertner might be notable. I have not looked though the past versions. Please work on this so that it can be developed inhto a valid article, if that is possible for this subject. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:25, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Causa limeña

    I became very discouraged when the Wikipedia police deleted my entry for this wonderful Peruvian dish. If I recall correctly, the reason given for deletion was that it was too "unimportant" for Wikipedia. I recently noticed that Causa limeña is mentioned elsewhere in Wikipedia. Since I wrote the entry, Peruvian restaurants have proliferated across U.S. and European cities, so perhaps the administrator who was offended by my work will reconsider. I am happy to work on the text to make it more acceptable if you deem it now worthy of this encyclopedia.Lastudies (talk) 19:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC) —Lastudies (talk) 19:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Lastudies, no, that's not correct. Based on your deleted contributions, you made one edit to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Causa (causa limeña) in November 2013, in which there was no article content, just the WP:AFC submission template. It was rejected because there was no content to assess, and then it was deleted after six months of inactivity as per the rules. See WP:CSD#G13. Please be nicer in the future, rather than bemoaning the "Wikipedia police" that "was offended by [your] work". – Muboshgu (talk) 20:10, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Anyway, I'll undelete the draft so you can see for yourself. Done – Muboshgu (talk) 20:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ruslan Marzaganov

    I, Nautiluscreed, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nautiluscreed (talk) 22:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Now available to you, Nautiluscreed. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 00:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The Joneses (band)

    The Joneses were an important band of the Los Angeles music scene in the early 80's. They bridged the gap between Punk and Glam. I can provide necessary articles and references needed to validate this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by TumblinDice86 (talk • contribs) 23:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. TumblinDice86 please provide the needed sourcing. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 00:34, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Oliver_Dominique

    I, OJKing13, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. OJKing13 (talk) 00:23, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. OJKing13 Please do improve the sourcing significantly. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 00:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Sorcerer (Linux distribution)

    This (and maybe other Linux distributions) article has been proposed for deletion by a vandal anonymous user. As this is one of the main (but not so known, nor less notable) Linux distributions, I believe this article should be restored, to be able to improve it. —Amitie 10g (talk) 03:42, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Jebra Kambole

    I, Sajo87, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sajo87 (talk) 06:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Since this appears to be in Swahili, either it must be transferred to another Wikipedia, or translated to English. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Abdullah Yolcu

    The page was submitted as draft, but they randomly deleted the page without giving any direction to improve the article, the reviewer could remove the copirighted parts and leave the rest enough part and say what are the things there to improve, but instead, the reviewer deleted the draft entirely. —43.245.120.179 (talk) 09:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The text is impenetrably dense and there are some referencing issues.

    With the text please add some suitable paragraph breaks so that the reader is invited in. Walls of back text prevent folk from reading

    "...anti-Sufism by Turkish and English medias.[2][3][4][5][6]" is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.

    The first current reference does not very the fact it is supposed to be citing, and is only a passing mention. For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

    Please apply that principle to all your referencing

    A substantial copyright violation. This must be removed. IT is so substantial that I am flagging for deletion, My apologies for not noting this at once Fiddle Faddle 11:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    It was deleted by someone else: Primefac. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Gravball

    I, 173.195.200.89, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 173.195.200.89 (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • The only text about the subject was "i don't exactly know what it is but i heard it and there was no article here so i decided to make one". I suggest you start again. Hut 8.5 17:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Sasha Compere

    I, Grn1749, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Grn1749 (talk) 18:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Grn1749 This draft does not, yet, demonstrate that Compere is notable (as Wikipedia uses that term). Please add additional cited sources to those originally inserted by Amylandis before moving this to the main article space or submitting it to a review by the articlesd for creation project. This draft has not (yet) been made part of the AfC project. I have done some copy editing and added bibliographic data to the sources, and removed the citation to the IMDB, which Wikipedia does not consider to be a reliable source. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    DESiegel Can you help me understand why you say the current sources don't prove Sasha Compere is notable? I read the Wikipedia Notability guidelines and it says there need to be multiple external, reliable sources that reference the person. Two of the current sources only cite Compere in passing, but one of the articles cited is exclusively about her hire on the show Miracle Workers (the Wikipedia page of which shows Compere to be the only series regular without a Wikipedia page), and the fourth source contains an interview with her. Thanks in advance for helping me understand what's needed. Grn1749 (talk) 11:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Grn1749 I did not do the equivalent of a full AfC review, just a quick note. But based on that and a second look after your message, I don't think this is quite ready for the article mainspace yet. The Variety piece is surely more than a passing mention, but it is a bit light perhaps to constitute Significant coverage]. But ]even granting it full value, the Collider piece is, as you said, an interview, and interviews are generally considered not to count as independent sources, which are normally needed to establish notability. In that case there is some comment from the reporter before the interview starts, but it is limited, and I would at best count that as the equal of 1/2 of a full source. The others are, as you mention, passing mentions which do not count for notability. The usual rule of thumb three reasonable quality independent reliable sources with significant coverage, although two may suffice if they are of particularly high quality. Add two additional sources comparable to the Variety' piece and I think this would be over the line of acceptance. Of course, a different editor doing a review might have a different opinion, this is to some extent a judgement call. Anyway, that is why I wrote what I did. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 14:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    DESiegelThat makes a lot of sense. Thanks for breaking it down for me, as I'm relatively new here (and you've already helped me once before!). Since this draft was created, Compere has been a series regular in the HBO show Love Life, so I expect I can find more sources for her. But, for the sake of argument, let's say I can't find more articles beyond passing references in reviews of the shows she's been in. When we look at the two TV shows she's been a series regular in, Miracle Workers and Love Life, in both those shows, she is the only series regular who does not have a Wikipedia page. Doesn't that suggest her career makes her notable even if her media coverage doesn't reflect that? Given that Compere is a Black woman, racial and gender bias may mean she has less coverage than a white male actor with comparable TV credits. Therefore, couldn't her career on its own justify a Wikipedia page, in the hopes that Wikipedia not reflect the biases found elsewhere on the web and in the media? Or, let me know if there's a different space where this kind of discussion is better addressed. Grn1749 (talk) 14:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Note, I'm asking this not just to pose random what-ifs, but because my primary interest in editing Wikipedia is to address under-coverage of women and people of color, so I'm trying to learn what the community's thinking is on these issues. Grn1749 (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Grn1749 In my view, the best approach is to look for those additional sources. If they can be found and addede, the issue is setteld. If not you could submit for approval and debate the issue if a reviewer declines, or move directly to mainspace and perhaps debate the issue at a [p[WP:AFD|deletion discussion]].
    There is systematic bias in the world, and since Wikipedia bases its coverage on what reliable sources have written, that bias must be reflected to some extent in Wikipedia's coverage of topics. Wikipedia does not exist to right great wrongs. Wikipedia's inclusions standards should not, IMO, be modified to include people who have been subject to bias when they do not meet the usual standards. The question is not worthiness, but reliable coverage. We include an article about Hitler, who was surely not worthy, but was very significant and had lots of coverage. We do not include Jane Doe (fictional) who was saintly and helped many, but was quite unknown outside the small town where she lived. The above is my own opinion -- I cannot speak for the community as a whole. But i believe it reflects the views of many and has current consensus.
    In future, discussions such as this would be better on the draft's talk page, Draft talk:Sasha Compere . In fact I will copy this exchange there, so that it remains with the draft. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 14:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    vantagehunt

    I, Jeagerph, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jeagerph (talk) 19:46, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    this article was not continued due to lack of information, months pass as subject of the article continue to grow I believe this is the right time to continue drafting article regarding vantagehunt. —Jeagerph (talk) 19:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:04, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Pouria Nabi

    I, Eluongo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Eluongo (talk) 00:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Electrify (company)

    I, Ytanpc, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ytanpc (talk) 01:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Valente Brothers

    I, Larryturner72, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Larryturner72 (talk) 06:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Larryturner72 Additional sources are needed before this draft can be approved. I have removed a citation to another Wikipedia article, which is not considered an acceptable source. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 14:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Walter Kolomoku

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 07:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. FloridaArmy I am sure you realize this needs significant work. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Majestic Film Company

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 07:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. FloridaArmy I have added metadata to the3 one source citation present. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:27, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lux Films

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 07:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done FloridaArmy The delted page appears to contain two separate drafts, one for "Lux Films" and one for "Comet Films". I think this is poor practice. Do you want both restored as separate drafts? Or what are you requesting? DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I am requesting whatever is there be restored so I can work on it. I can't see the draft so I don't know how those subjects are related. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:48, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:A Game of Pool (film)

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 07:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. FloridaArmy please add sources, none are currently cited. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Michelle Baherier

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Clumie (talk) 09:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC) Michelle Baherier[reply]

    Not done Clumie This was deleted under G11 (promotion) and G12 (copyright issues). It was not deleted via G13 (expired draft). (It was also in the wrong name space, but that is a comparatively minor issue.) Under those circumstances, it cannot be restored through this process. You may ask the deleting admin, Jimfbleak about it. If you are not satisfied, or if there is no response after several days, you may take the matter to Deletion review. However, I would not expect anyone to undelete unless the previous deletion is judged to have been totally mistaken. You could start a new draft if you choose, being careful to avoid promotional language and content, and to write in your own original words, not copying fro0m another site.
    If "Michelle Baherier" was not the page you intended to ask for the restoration of (your request was not entirely clear), please specify exactly what page or article you want restored and why. I see that you edited several pages that have been deleted, but none seem to have been deleted under G13. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 16:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Murder of Holly Branagan

    I, FrankyCentaur, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FrankyCentaur (talk) 13:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:18, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Theoretical behaviorism

    Need tor revise — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rayner111 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC) —DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 14:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Leelavathi Govindasamy

    Unable to edit the page earlier due to unforeseeable circumstances —Shamgal15 (talk) 16:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Shamgal15 I have done some limited editing for format, and set up a proper infobox. Inline citations to Independent reliable sources are needed. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 18:03, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Integrative propositional analysis

    I, Swallis2014, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Swallis2014 (talk) 23:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Tim Goodill

    G13'd when I was editing it and I ended up creating a new version. The original is needed for proper history attribution (the version I did would require a histmerge —Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:53, 17 August 2020 (UTC). Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:53, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Syrus Marcus Ware

    I, Lauryndavis, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lauryndavis (talk) 01:44, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Lauryndavis (talk) 01:45, 18 August 2020 (UTC) Syrus Marcus Ware is a public figure, author of 5 books, 4 forth coming, is a core team member of Black Lives Matter and is a noted Canadian figure.[reply]

    Hector Giuffre

    very hard to create, and I was waiting for publishing. Just now I realized you did not publish it becase it was in Spanish. I can translate in English but it is gone, and I did not keep a copy —Jgiuffre2 (talk) 03:35, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Monte Hawley

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 05:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:55, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The Broken Violin

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 05:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:55, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bhavik Sarkhedi

    I, Weakdealer, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Weakdealer 07:18, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lux Films

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 07:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Harbinger Systems

    {{subst:refund Harbinger Systems Harbinger Systems has been helping many global ISVs and enterprises to build software solutions in HR Tech, Health Tech, and Learn Tech domains. The company’s Wikipedia page was more a piece of corporate information to be treated as an encyclopedia content to help users understand what our business does and how it works and not aimed at deriving any commercial/promotional activities. However once undeleted, we will restructure the page content and resubmit it in according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.30.130 (talk) 09:35, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Harbinger Systems has been helping many global ISVs and enterprises to build software solutions in HR Tech, Health Tech, and Learn Tech domains. The company’s Wikipedia page was more a piece of corporate information to be treated as an encyclopedia content to help users understand what our business does and how it works and not aimed at deriving any commercial/promotional activities. However once undeleted, we will restructure the page content and resubmit it in according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —122.169.30.130 (talk) 09:38, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Cyprien Verseux

    The French Wikipedia restored it (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyprien_Verseux) ; He is a very notable Astrobiologist —2A01:CB00:B51:3E00:2550:7CE8:146B:D2A6 (talk) 13:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    We are not the French Wikipedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at Draft:Cyprien Verseux. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks a lot. I am a bit lost. How to convert it from a draft to a regular article? Kind Regards. 2A01:CB00:B51:3E00:C1DE:C1FF:F43B:71BE (talk) 21:10, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    2A01:CB00:B51:3E00:C1DE:C1FF:F43B:71BE, work on the draft and use the WP:AFC process. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:27, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:November (2019 film)

    I, ShappeAli, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ShappeAli (talk) 15:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Jasbeer Singh (author)

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Sukh.editor (talk) 17:09, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Sukh.editor, do you mean Draft:Jasbeer Singh (author)? – Muboshgu (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    YesSukh.editor (talk) 17:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Leelavathi Govindasamy

    Need to update events and edit page —Shamgal15 (talk) 17:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Øystein Lund Andersen

    I, Giuseppelucia333, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Giuseppelucia333 (talk) 17:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Øystein Lund Andersen

    The draft article was deleted because It was older than 5-6 months. I now wish to continue with the draft and request approval for it when its finalized. "Publish changes" button below —Giuseppelucia333 (talk) 18:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    There has never been a mainspace article about Andersen, only a draft. —C.Fred (talk) 18:03, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Giuseppelucia333, and I restored the draft before you posted this request. Did you not see? – Muboshgu (talk) 18:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bolt Threads

    I, Amira.haddon, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Amira.haddon (talk) 18:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Independence Rock (Oregon)

    This was deleted as nonsense in 2009, but it looks like it existed in 2004 ([1] was a disambiguation page that mentioned it), so I'm wondering if an actual article got replaced by nonsense at some point. Please undelete if and only if there are good revisions in the history. —64.203.187.115 (talk) 18:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done The article has never contained any useful content. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:43, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Woodruff Sawyer

    I, 2600:1700:1151:1201:7486:7000:34F8:A47D, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2600:1700:1151:1201:7486:7000:34F8:A47D (talk) 22:27, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:31, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Starzoner/Crucible (2019)

    I would like to request the return of this page, as well as the following 3 pages The Demon Crown (2017), User:Starzoner/FJ, and User:Starzoner/Ghost Ship (2017). Thank you —Starzoner (talk) 01:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Werewolf Ambulance

    I, KevvyBakes, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. KevvyBakes (talk) 00:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Pree

    I, Maytabol, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Maytabol (talk) 01:47, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Rebecca Brown (Yoder), M.D.

    I, Joedav, request the undeletion of this article Rebecca Brown Yoder, M.D. submission deleted under Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G4. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Joedav--Joedav (talk) 02:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Not doneThis was yet another attempt to recreate the article previously deleted after discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Brown (missionary). You will not be able to get it restored by changing the name under which you write it. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Please create Deepanshu Titoriya Article

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Deepanshu titoriya (talk) 05:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Pelin Ermis

    Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pelin Ermis. There were a lot of sources that do guarantee nobility that I havent been able find during the AfD. [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] —~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 10:18, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Or rather, some of these sources didn't exist at that time. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 10:22, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Ghulam Hassan (psychiatrist)

    I, 182.186.12.203, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 182.186.12.203 (talk) 10:54, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    This page is about a celebrity and public figure that require editing —182.186.12.203 (talk) 10:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The Far Meridian

    I, Starsandwhales, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. starsandwhales (talk) 16:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Modality (ORM)

    I, CloD, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CloD (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Champion (League of Legends)

    Requesting for the page to be restored into draftspace —Prisencolin (talk) 18:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Prisencolin, the AfD addressed draftification and some editors were opposed to it, so I have to decline this request. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Champion (League of Legends), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The article was actually deleted by an admin through WP:A7. In the event that @Fastily: declines a restoration request will it be able to be restored here, can it be restored through here afterwards? I don’t believe a consensus of opposing editors is allowed to censure a topic from existing in draft space, where notability requirements basically don’t exist .-—Prisencolin (talk) 19:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Prisencolin, I believe that if Fastily doesn't do it, you can go to deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:15, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Spencer Rattler

    The article has been recreated. Perhaps some of the original article can be incorporated in the new one? —~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 19:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Editorofthewiki/Spencer Rattler. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Tfd instructions

    The template was discussed at TfD, with the outcome being, effectively, merge and delete. After the merge was done, the history should have been preserved for attribution (as the standard solution per WP:Merge and delete). The template was tagged for G6 deletion, but I removed the tag and turned the template into a redirect. Now I see that the template has been deleted nonetheless. Ping to the closer of the discussion. Not pinging the deleted admin per the instructions in the edit notice on their talk page. – Uanfala (talk) 19:59, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • (Non-admin closer of the discussion) I don't see how the outcome of the discussion is "merge and delete". The nomination recommended "substituting and deleting", the template creator had "no objection" to the nomination for substitution and deletion, and the final !vote was to "subst and delete as is done for other templates". When closing the discussion, given the unanimity of the participants, I therefore substituted the template and nominated it for deletion pursuant to the outcome of the deletion discussion ({{db-xfd}}). Please let me know if you have any questions. Best, —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:University of Texas at Austin seal.svg

    Requesting undeletion of past revisions of this logo, as it is in the public domain. I've explained the history of the copyright expiring on the description page. —IagoQnsi (talk) 23:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Apes of the State

    Please userfy this page history to User:Godsy/Apes of the State. I wish to see what was previously there and reevaluate this topic per WP:NBAND. The deleting administrator, Kim Dent-Brown, has not been particularly active as of late or I would have made this request on their talk page. —— Godsy (TALKCONT) 23:55, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Des fleurs pour Algernon

    I, Abolibibelot, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abolibibelot (talk) 06:49, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Nirajan Pradhan

    I am planning to write an article about Nirajan Pradhan. Unfortunately, the article was deleted in 2018 and I found that he is quite a popular actor Nepalese movie/Kollywood. I already have done some workout about this article and I want to write about him again. —Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 09:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Bijay chaurasia: do you want the original version restored to a draft somewhere, or do you just want to write a new article? The fact an article was deleted doesn't prevent you from writing a new article about the same topic. As long as a new version addresses the reason for deletion it won't be deleted again. Hut 8.5 12:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Miadhu Crystal Awards

    I, ShappeAli, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ShappeAli (talk) 09:32, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Maldives Film Awards

    I, ShappeAli, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ShappeAli (talk) 09:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Jolly_Silks

    Its not come under unambiguous advertising ,User:Bibinkerala was not under any company or person also adding article with proper guidlines of wikipedia —Bibinkerala (talk) 09:36, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Gravitational coupling constant

    There are numerous articles referring to the gravitational coupling constant as the gravitational force between two electrons. This isn't some esoteric concept, but quite common in quantum gravity discussions. See e.g. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.06036.pdf https://vixra.org/pdf/1604.0198v2.pdf https://www.nature.com/articles/265710a0#:~:text=SIMPLE%20arguments%20involving%20gravitational%20fragmentation,5%C3%9710%E2%88%9239). —82.15.216.70 (talk) 12:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. SoWhy 13:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Monolith AI

    I, 92.1.160.178, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 92.1.160.178 (talk) 14:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft: List of settlements of North Macedonia by population

    I, SoWhAt249, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SoWhAt249 (talk) 19:36, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:42, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Constantina L. Pair de Christos

    I, Wikicontributor 2018, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wikicontributor 2018 (talk) 20:25, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Edith Maxwell (author)

    I, Alhutch, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Alhutch (talk) 20:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:44, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Harley Fresh

    My article has been deleted after me and my team added what the nominators want. The nominators also have less knowledge about this subject and rely in outdated sources such as https://allworldceleb.com/mrfreshasian-net-worth-wiki-bio-age-height-real-name/ . If there is any problems I will fix them, please restore my article. —Kalabsm insta (talk) 00:52, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harley Fresh, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Tone (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:2030 in film

    Can i have it returned per G7? Can I include in the request for the page User:Starzoner/XJ, User:Starzoner/HLJ, and User:Starzoner/Deep Fathom (2001) —Starzoner (talk) 01:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    William L. “Corn Pop” Morris

    The article was deleted for the stated reason that the subject is not sufficiently notable to justify having an article. The article should be restored because the subject is highly notable. The subject was focus of hundreds of new articles and tv news programs after former Vice President Joe Biden discussed Mr. Morris at length in a speech in 2019 while Vice President Biden was campaigning for President. Even President Donald Trump has discussed Mr. Morris in speeches and in other public forums. William L. “Corn Pop” Morris is substantially more notable than the subject of many Wikipedia articles. —Number9060862 (talk) 02:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Number9060862: This article was moved to Draft:William L. “Corn Pop” Morris by Loksmythe, who stated that it was undersourced. Looking at the article, it only uses one source - which is not enough to establish notability on its own. You'd need more coverage to establish notability. My recommendation is to work on adding and improving the article in the draftspace before moving it live, as this would give you more time to work on it. It looks like Loksmythe added an AfC tag, so putting it through the Articles for Creation process is also an option. This would take considerably longer time, but it would be reviewed by another editor before it's moved live. Offhand there's also this being a mention to consider - it may end up that Morris may not be independently notable of the Biden campaign itself and as such, should only be mentioned in the main article. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:38, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ciro Nieli

    I, MatthewHoobin, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —Matthew - (talk) 03:55, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Eric Johanson (musician)

    I, Debraannclark, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Debraannclark (talk) 05:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Tenghuang

    I, RoyalCathayan, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. RoyalCathayan (talk) 06:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Edward "Ted" Gray

    I originally submitted this page in 2012. It is a brief biography of my father who was a local historian and published a number of books. It was initially rejected, in part because he was still alive - fair enough. However, he has since died in 2018 and I was wondering if an updated version of the page could be considered for publication? I am not very familiar with the Wikipedia processes and the updated version of the page is present on my personal user page. —Petergray4045 (talk) 11:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Eric Johanson (musician)

    I, Debraannclark, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Debraannclark (talk) 15:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=974192048"