Talk:Willesden Jewish Cemetery
Appearance
Willesden Jewish Cemetery was nominated as a Art and architecture good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 29, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Text and/or other creative content from Willesden Jewish Cemetery was copied or moved into List of people buried at Willesden Jewish Cemetery. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
FindAGrave—cannot be used as a source
@Headhitter: FindAGrave is a user-generated, unreliable source. Please see WP:RSP. buidhe 08:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Buidhe: Thanks for alerting me. I've now removed all the FindAGrave references. Best wishes Headhitter (talk) 11:45, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Willesden Jewish Cemetery/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 04:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Procedural close: Since this article is organized as a list, not a prose article (per discussion at WT:GAN), it is not eligible for consideration as a GA article. If there is significantly more prose that could be written on the cemetery, you could split into an article on the cemetery and a list of burials, but in either case the article would have to go through significant changes before being eligible for GAN. buidhe 04:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, Buidhe. What would the significant changes be? Headhitter (talk) 13:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Headhitter, Well, right now with a bit better sourcing it could be submitted to FLC. Alternately, if there were significantly more about the cemetery itself—I mean at least a few sections worth—it would make sense to split the article, just like we have Arlington National Cemetery and List of burials at Arlington National Cemetery. However, this is not a major cemetery so I'm not sure there's enough to say that it would be worth splitting. buidhe 18:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Buidhe, my concern would be that if the existing article were split into two, or if it were to become a list rather than an article, it would then be out of kilter with similar articles for London cemeteries. I'm not aware of other London cemeteries, and particularly Jewish ones, where this has been done. Headhitter (talk) 18:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Headhitter, Well, if articles like Brady Street Cemetery or Golders Green Jewish Cemetery were further developed with details about the people who were buried there, they would probably turn into lists. buidhe 19:48, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Buidhe, my concern would be that if the existing article were split into two, or if it were to become a list rather than an article, it would then be out of kilter with similar articles for London cemeteries. I'm not aware of other London cemeteries, and particularly Jewish ones, where this has been done. Headhitter (talk) 18:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Headhitter, Well, right now with a bit better sourcing it could be submitted to FLC. Alternately, if there were significantly more about the cemetery itself—I mean at least a few sections worth—it would make sense to split the article, just like we have Arlington National Cemetery and List of burials at Arlington National Cemetery. However, this is not a major cemetery so I'm not sure there's enough to say that it would be worth splitting. buidhe 18:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Former good article nominees
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Architecture articles
- Unknown-importance Architecture articles
- C-Class Death articles
- Mid-importance Death articles
- C-Class Historic sites articles
- Low-importance Historic sites articles
- WikiProject Historic sites articles
- C-Class Jewish history-related articles
- Low-importance Jewish history-related articles
- WikiProject Jewish history articles
- C-Class Judaism articles
- Low-importance Judaism articles
- C-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military memorials and cemeteries articles
- Military memorials and cemeteries task force articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Unassessed visual arts articles
- Unassessed public art articles
- Public art articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles