This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
I extracted this list[1] of AITUC Working Committee members from 1966, clearly showing both CPI and CPI(M) elements. But can't find a place for it in the article mainspace for now --Soman (talk) 13:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC) ;[reply]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the 1964 split in the Communist Party of India was ignored by the Soviet press, but was overemphasized in Chinese mass media? Source: ""The split went unnoticed in the Soviet press, but was over-played by the Peking mass media"" ([1], p. 335)
Overall: Article was both moved to mainspace and nominated today. It appears to be well sourced throughout with inline citations. The hook is interesting and mentioned in the prose and followed up with a reference. QPQ is done. Good to go. Aria1561 (talk) 16:55, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comparing 1958 NC with 1961 NC....
I came across this document, [2], which doesn't qualify as WP:RS. Notably the document includes some glaring errors (such as the description of RCPI factionalism in the end), but presumably follows CPI more closely. Looking at the list from the 1958 National Council, comparing with this document we can say;