Talk:Nanker Phelge

The Rolling Stones Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Rolling Stones, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Rolling Stones on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The Rolling StonesWikipedia:WikiProject The Rolling StonesTemplate:WikiProject The Rolling StonesThe Rolling Stones
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Start‑class Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep.

Untitled

I edited out:

Satan's Holiday (1965 recording by The Lancasters, credited to Fowley/Lawrence/Blackmore/Phelge)

The Phelge mentioned here is NOT the Phelge from Nanker/Phelge. (Heteren 21:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Removed Sad Day as by all accounts it is a Jagger/Richards composition. ScottSwan 05:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this link, as it would be akin to book burning. 68.144.130.254 (talk) 15:03, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why this link would be deleted. "Nanker Phelge" is not a pseudonym for "Jagger/Richards", nor is it a pseudonym for "The Rolling Stones" (since many of the songs were collaborations with non-Stones writers). ScottSwan (talk) 20:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think Nanker Phelge deserves its own entry. A lot of the information in the Wikipedia article can be found in a great book by Philip Norman called "The Stones". Oddly enough, this book - one of the best books I have read ever - does not come up when you search for "The Roling Stones" on Amazon. But if you like the Rolling Stones you should read this book. And please keep the article. If I get hold of a copy of Norman's book, I will add citations to the article. More support for the article could appear in the Nankering With the Rolling Stones by Jimmy Phelge, though I have not read that. -Unregistered User

Sources?!!

As was commented here (quite a long time ago), Nanker Phelge deserves an article, be it small or large. As is, it doesn't currently have any references, two days before April, 2012!!! Some questions regarding royalties for the songs, and whether former members (Mick Taylor in particular, but also any others who may have performed on the records, even as a session musician) bring forth more questions to the average layperson. There have to be some Rolling Stones editors and/or fans with information to support the article. Without any referencing, soon, it will this next time fail and be deleted. Please do think on that, and all help is appreciated! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 15:10, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paint It Black

Where does Bill Wyman say that "Paint It Black" was a total group effort and should be credited to all five members of the band? I don't even trust that. WikiPro1981X (talk) 21:07, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nanker Phelge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This statement is either wrongly placed or totally wrong

"Group manager Andrew Loog Oldham has a different explanation, as he writes in his book Stoned,[2] describing Nanker Phelge as the idea of manager Allen Klein to let Oldham share in the royalties. "

Where it appears in the Wikipedia article, it seems to refer to songwriting credits. This isn't possible, the Nanker Phelge credit first appeared in 1963, Klein didn't become their business manager until 1965 (see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_Klein#The_Rolling_Stones ).

I didn't read Oldham's book, but if the statement is true, then it likely refers to the manufacturing entity mentioned lower down in the Wikipedia article:

"The name resurfaced in the late 1960s on the labels of the original vinyl pressings of Beggars Banquet and Let It Bleed. Manufacture of both albums was credited to Nanker Phelge, which was then acknowledged as an ABKCO company (ABKCO was manufacturing the records that still bore the London and Decca labels)."

If Oldham said it in regard to the songwriting credits, then he was mistaken.