Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sairg

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheSandDoctor (talk | contribs) at 16:09, 6 September 2020 (Comment, marking case as closed (using spihelper.js)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Sairg

Sairg (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sairg/Archive.



24 August 2020

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

Addition of same content as other socks by Sairg:

  • @Bloggerjoydeep:[1]
  • @Logical Man 2000:[2]

The sockpuppet only has made one edit so far, but continued to edit war with hopping IPs in the same page, plus the usual verbose rants in the talk page Talk:Boro people against me and User:Chaipau. Austronesier (talk) 10:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Obvious socking is obvious . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:37, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It is striking that this account was created in June [4] a couple of months before the last sock was identified in the middle of August [5]. Is there an army of sleeper accounts associated with this user? Chaipau (talk) 12:07, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These are all fake allegations. I'll keep checking your activities mr. Chaipau. You'll be blocked very soon. I don't have right to complain to Arbcom otherwise you might have been blocked. You are trying to WP:OWN the pages. These source are well known to everybody. Why are you trying to remove cited text ? You've no right to remove reliable source. You can't even win a argument with me. So, You try to revert my edits and complain anyone. I'll not allow you to remove any cited text. :Admins, kindly block Chaipau and his colleagues from editing Boro people pages. They only edit to remove cited text. 47.29.161.88 (talk) 12:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC) This new editor Austronesier on Boro people page and Chaipau are friends.This is clearly a kind of puppetry. They only remove cited text from reliable source to show their dominance in Wikipedia. Please run checkusers on these two accounts. 47.29.161.88 (talk) 12:48, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Austronesier: isn't even new. They created their account 20th September 2017 and made their first edit three days later. As for arbcom, why you dont have the right to appeal to arbcom? If you have been using multiple accounts/IP's then arbcom is pretty much the way to go if you want to edit here again. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Victor Schmidt: IP can't complain to Arbcom. My first account was blocked with fake allegations. Admin wasn't willing to even listen. Now I'm not allowed to have any account. So, So I'm using IP. If wiki don't want cited text from reliable source, Why do wiki even give information about Boro people? Delete the page itself. Kindly check contribution of Chaipau and Austronesier in Boro people. They mostly removed. You'll understand their personal problem with a community. 47.29.137.204 (talk) 13:15, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If your first account was blocked, you can theoretically appeal to arbcom. However, without knowing the account I cant investigate (and I don't have the time for that today anyway). Victor Schmidt (talk) 13:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My understanding about false allegations by Austronesier. It is personal attack and target on editors who add cited text from reliable source. Since he lack any reliable source for any of his claim therefore he accuse other editors of sock puppetry and usual verbose rants. He and his friend aren't to contribute in that page. They only remove cited text from reliable source - https://sigma.toolforge.org/usersearch.py?name=Austronesier&page=Boro_people&server=enwiki&max= and https://sigma.toolforge.org/usersearch.py?name=Chaipau&page=Boro_people&server=enwiki&max= 2409:4065:E8E:2335:95AE:6DCB:9836:3953 (talk) 10:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This IP user has confessed to sock-puppetry, here, even as he accuses others of "personal attacks" for stating the obvious. I have engaged with previous socks on WP:AGF, but it is impossible to make any headway because of this user's strong attachments to WP:FRINGE, WP:OR and general WP:CIR. I am not sure this user even understands what WP:SOCK is and even after being made aware, continued to WP:BE, and edit war, for example in People of Assam, which had to be semi-protected. This is a discussion regarding the WP:BE issues then: Talk:People_of_Assam#Sock_edits. Chaipau (talk) 12:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

28 August 2020

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets


A very keen interest on the boundaries of the Chutia kingdom with u:SashankaChutia, confirmed sock-puppet of Sairg.

  • u:SashankaChutia [6]
  • u:Bodo53.cn [7], [8]
  • u:JojoRabbitParadise [9]

Chaipau (talk) 18:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC) Chaipau (talk) 18:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Note that this case is a duplicate of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sairg. Best, —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sairg&oldid=977044472"