User talk:Drajay1976
If I have left a message on your talk page, you can reply there. It will be on my watch list and I will get back to you as soon as possible.
pov
you wanted to write all about the humanitarian aid, drajay, heres a map I saw on twitter. good int it? you are fighting for your side all right aren't you? Wikipedia is meant to present RS and not just putinist pov all the time, remember doctor. what a month of humanitarian aid has done - Sayerslle (talk) 11:53, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- Sayerslle, you are completely misunderstanding my deeds (and words even).
- I first made the change over which you are indulging in edit war with the following summary "The citations do not warrant the therm "heavy". The second inline citation after the sentence only describes a "crushing" defeat only in Ilovaysk. This cannot be taken as a heavy defeat for Ukrainian armed forces in the overall battle" The reason for the edit was that the inline citations did not use the word "heavy". So I thought it did not belong there. You reverted it with some statement about "here we go, - its important here because as hilsums report showed and she said, this was crushing decisive, explained by Russian intervention -)"
- I am okay with the word "heavy" if indeed the hilsmum report says so. So I reverted your edit with this comment. ""heavy" was deleted based on two citations after this sentence. If "hilsum report" says it was "heavy", include that as a citation before reinserting". It means that put the "hilsum reference" after this text also. But it seems you did not understand what I said. You reverted it again with the summary "have been heavily defeated' is from hilsums report - please stop your pro- kremlin 'nuances'".
- It dawned on me then only that you may not know how to use the same inline citations at two places. So I made a more clear summary "Please put <ref name ="hilsum"> or something appropriate before that ref text, and paste <ref name ="hilsum"/> after the current sentence b4 reverting" and reverted the still unreferenced statement "heavy defeat".
- You reverted it again!!! Cant you put a citation where it is needed? The same citation can be used at two different places. Put that citation here please. Edit summary statement that this is referenced from some source is not enough. Put the "hilsum ref" after the statement you are repeatedly reverting PLEASE. --Drajay1976 (talk) 12:10, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- did you try watching the report where you will hear, with your ears, the words. Sayerslle (talk) 12:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- Sayerslle, no, I did not. I don't watch videos generally, I only read the links as videos take up too much of my bandwidth. But dont be emotional here. You can write wikipedia in accordance with the rules and policies that we have here. You can use the word "heavy" if that reference supports it, BUT PUT THAT REFERENCE AS INLINE SOURCE OF THE WORD "HEAVY". I will believe you if you say that the link contains the statement as I wont check video links. I am not reverting you to push a POV, but to ensure that statements which are likely to be challenged have inline citations. This is wikipedia policy. Citations should be there in the article, not in edit summaries. and please assume WP:GOODFAITH. If you cant assume good faith, please WP:Don't assume that there is bad faith. --Drajay1976 (talk) 12:27, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- did you try watching the report where you will hear, with your ears, the words. Sayerslle (talk) 12:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Beheading of Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar
Hello, Drajay1976,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Beheading of Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beheading of Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, TheLongTone (talk) 13:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beheading of Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PTI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Experience
Mar4d has more experience than you in editing. Your account is old but you have less experience than him.
Are you aware of every sub-policies covered under WP:NPOV, WP:VERIFY, WP:OR, WP:WORDS, WP:CHERRYPICKING, WP:FALSEBALANCE, WP:UNDUE, WP:SYNTH, WP:OWNBEHAVIOR, WP:DISRUPTSIGNS, WP:EXTRAORDINARY, WP:ONUS, WP:BURDEN, WP:COATRACK etc.?
Mar4d is Civil POV pusher and SheriffIsInTown is gradually becoming tendentious editor.
You have less than 1500 edits on English Wikipedia. Mar4d has crossed 60,000 and SheriffIsIntown has crossed 9000. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Space Captain (talk • contribs) 14:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
I have less experience in En.Wiki, but I have more than 30,000 edits in all wiki projects combined. I am not very active in en.wiki and in wiki projects in general these days, but I am an administrator in ml.wiki and I have working knowledge in the policies you mentioned above. --Drajay1976 (talk) 14:38, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
But I dont have enough time!!! That is the only problem. :-/ --Drajay1976 (talk) 14:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beheading of Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IANS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Drajay1976. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The article All Kerala Blood Donors Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
non-notable company. fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Drajay1976. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Drajay1976. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Drajay1976. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Orphaned non-free image File:HolyHellMemoir.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HolyHellMemoir.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rajith Kumar. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4073:387:9369:6D72:531F:B47F:6230 (talk) 14:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Please log in and sign when you make comments on user pages as it enables others to reply to your comments. I did not add commentary, my own point of view, or my own personal analysis to any article. I strongly suspect that you are not logging in to mask the fact that you have already added your own commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis etc to the article in question and are trying to prevent me from making the article neutral and ensuring that it conforms to the formal tone expected in a wikipedia. For further conversation, please log in. Thank you. --Drajay1976 (talk) 09:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)