User talk:AEku482

Hello. I reverted your latest edits in article Hindu mythological wars. Your points are incorrect. Parashurama was not Atimaharathi. He killed 21 Khsatriyas individually but not in combined. Parashurama was equal to 4 maharathis. Hence Bhishma was equal to 4 Maharathis. Coming to Ashwatthama. Angry Ashwatthama becomes a destroyer like Shiva but not equal to his potential. Hence Ashwatthama used Narayanastra and slayed 1 Akshauni pandava army. Arjuna slayed 3 crore demons in a single shot. Arjuna alone defeated all Kuru warriors and 4 Akshauni army in Virat yudh. Hence he was named Atimaharathi but not clear whether he is equal to 1 Atimaharathi or more than that. I hope you are clear. Fire star on heat (talk) 01:59, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Refer to above content. Don't add unsourced content as you did in articles Arjuna and Hindu mythological wars. If you have anything, please mention in talk page. Don't edit without citations. Thank you Fire star on heat (talk) 03:02, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Hillelfrei. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Bhishma seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hillelfrei ^talk 20:59, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bhishma. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. xRENEGADEx 21:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by XRENEGADEx (talk • contribs)

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Abhimanyu, you may be blocked from editing. SuperGoose007 ^(Honk!) 14:55, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing July 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing as you did it in article Hindu mythological wars. If you continue to edit in such a manner which oppose the real content, you may be blocked from editing. Fire star on heat (talk) 17:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kurukshetra war. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Template:Z187 Fire star on heat (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm Fire star on heat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Astra (weapon), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fire star on heat (talk) 01:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Kartavirya Arjuna, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Fire star on heat (talk) 13:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warrior class or level of Bhishma

You have shown lot of interest on character Bhishma. From your edits both in articles and on talk pages, it is clear that you are fan of Bhishma. Here is evidence: [1] and [2]. 1st seems to be wrong but 2nd one is correct. It's not wrong and not a problem but the way you are editing is not right way. Different editors have different favourites but they shouldn't edit in a wrong manner and change original content. This is purely termed as vandalism and regarded as disruptive editing. However Bhishma is not Atimaharathi as per your claim but he is Maharathi and equal to 4 Maharathis. Go through this to have a better understanding [3] and please understand reality. I noticed that you raised this discussion already. So please don't raise same discussion again and again. Go through above mentioned link thoroughly and understand. I hope you won't repeat this next time again. Also please be careful in editing. Persistent vandalism might lead to loss of editing privileges. Thank you and have a nice day. Fire star on heat (talk) 13:58, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Virata Parva. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Fire star on heat (talk) 17:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Uttara (Mahabharata), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 20:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Syamantaka, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 20:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Brahmashirsha astra, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 20:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be more clear: I think you are trying to improve these articles, but you need to slow down and learn more about what Wikipedia expects, before adding anything else. Please include sources for your claims, and please use the Preview function to make sure you are leaving articles in a readable state. Thank you Jessicapierce (talk) 20:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Hindu mythological wars, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. You have been already warned on same criteria for adding your own research in artcile Virata Parva. Please add proper citations before you edit article. It is better to put your own views in article's talk page with reliable sources and proper citations. Fire star on heat (talk) 09:39, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit user page content as you did in my own user page[4]. Instead add your views either on my talk page or in article's talk page. Thank you and have a nice day. Fire star on heat (talk) 09:44, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I already told you not to change content on my user page. Again you did this [5] Instead add discussion on my talk page. Please follow wikipedia policies correctly. Hope you won't add or change content of my user page. For any queries use talk pages not user pages. It seems that you are very new and doesn't have prior knowledge about the ways to talk with fellow users. From next time, don't do that. Thank you and have a nice day. Fire star on heat (talk) 17:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]