Jump to content

User talk:Molee4real

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Molee4real (talk | contribs) at 14:25, 21 September 2020 (→August 2020). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Counsellorsalah (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP: NMUSICIAN, - Napster, Amazon, Apple Music and Google plus are not acceptable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 12:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Molee4real! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 12:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Counsellorsalah (May 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Silent ocean limited moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Silent ocean limited, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EditQwerty (talk) 17:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Silent ocean limited

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Silent ocean limited, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EditQwerty (talk) 09:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Information icon Hello, Molee4real. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 09:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Swalah said Mohamed moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Swalah said Mohamed, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 15:28, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ako Group Ltd

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ako Group Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 10:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing logged out

Please review WP:SOCK. You cannot log out to remove a speedy deletion template on your articles. Are you being paid for your contributions? Your contributions are far too promotional and the article on Ako Group is not discernible from spam. Do take care to only summarize what independent secondary sources have said about the subject. – Thjarkur (talk) 13:19, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Molee4real, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Swalah said mohamed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swalah said mohamed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swalah said mohamed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 14:41, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 15:40, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for reaching out. I was away from my computer over the weekend so I apologize for the delay in my response. Anyway, I left this warning because all of your edits so far have been related to Swalah Said Mohamed, creating pages for him and his companies and re-creating them after their deletion. This is taken to mean that your sole purpose of having an account is to promote Mohamed. Wikipedia is for sharing information, not promotion. My advice for creating an article, if that's what you want to do, is to read Help:Your first article. My personal advice is that, in order to warrant an article, an individual must be WP:Notable, which is shown by citations to WP:Reliable sources, which contain in-depth discussion of the subject. Sources like forums and blogs are not reliable and therefore cannot establish notability. In your article on Mohamed, you cite to Forbes, for example, but there does not appear to be any reference to him in the article, so that cannot be counted. If you have questions please let me know, but in general I would advise you to avoid creating more Mohamed-related articles, because you risk your account being banned, temporarily or permanently. I understand you want to promote this individual, but unless he is independently notable, his article will not be kept. Cheers ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 12:56, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Sandstein 19:20, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Molee4real (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, Administrators. I am sorry for being a problem in here, And I didn't know that keeping on editing only one page on Wikipedia its A Mess. I have read and understand your Policies. I have realised that I have done a mistake and I am apologizing to be unblocked, and you can make a followup on my Contributions if I will repeat the same mistake. Please if there is a chance unblock me, and I promise not to break any rule I am fine now, I understand what's fine and what's not.Sandstein: Molee4real (talk) 09:01, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to demonstrate your understanding of the relevant policies by explaining what you did wrong, what steps you will take to avoid doing it again, and tell what constructive contributions you want to make. As this request does not do these things, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 15:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Molee4real (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have Changed Hello, Administrators. I was blocked from editing Wikipedia because of violating Wikipedia policy, because I used Wikipedia for advertisements while wikipedia is not a place for advertisement. I have learn a lot of policy, now I know that I can not create any artical about my self or anythinhg that's close to me, there is a way to do it. Now I have understand that while editing an artical your thoughts should not be to praise the topic. I am sorry about my english I am from Tanzania we normally speak Swahili, and I am better in Swahili Version of Wikipedia. So starting today I won't edit anything that aim to advertise anything, I won't start any artical thayt focicus only on promoting something, I won't create any artical about my self. Right now I need to focus on Tourism articals in Tanzania where we it lacks a lot of artical and people need to know about them. Please I insist if possible unblock me, and I will do what Wikipidia Policies needs me to do. Thanks. Molee4real (talk)

Decline reason:

Maybe you should get some more experience with Wikipedia in your native language. Then, once you've got a history of good contributions that you can point to over there, you can ask to be unblocked here. This is only a suggestion, and you can make another unblock request if you want. However, I think this will give you the best chance of being unblocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Molee4real (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have Changed Hello, Administrators. In fact i have already gained a lot of experience in my native language, and my mistake was to use Wikipedia for advertisement, i have read and understand well, That in here people don't use this place for advertising themselves or something. I have understand i have to contribute in different pages rather than only the page i have created. I love wikipedia and i am humble for being punished for violating its Policies. I believe the time that i was banned out from using wikipedia it has taught me A Lot of things about Wikipedia. please Unblock me and make a follow up to see my contributions, from now on i am dealing with Archaeological articals from tanzania. Tank you

Decline reason:

I don't see anything different in this unblock request from the past few declined ones. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Molee4real


I received the following request from this account per e-mail, which I consider inadequate per the declines above, but which I leave for others to evaluate:

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Molee4real (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Molee4real (talk) 14:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)molee4real}}[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Molee4real&oldid=979575402"