Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dwaro
Dwaro
Dwaro (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dwaro/Archive.
27 September 2020
– A checkuser has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Hakz77 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Similar interest in Osmocom as blocked sock User:Afvalbak, and the account was created a few weeks after Afvalbak was blocked. The behavioral evidence could be a coincidence, so I'd like a CU check. signed, Rosguill talk 19:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC) signed, Rosguill talk 19:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk endorsed but not with a lot of enthusiasm - The short gap between when Afvalbak was blocked and Hakz77 created, and picking up editing on Osmocom seems like enough to justify CU. They also both edited Replicant (operating system), as did Dwaro. And, the timecards look pretty similar. MeneerTijn is the only account in the archives that's not stale, and their behavior doesn't really fit the pattern, so I'm not too optimistic anything will come of this. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)- Everything is
Stale, so I'm declining the check. Salvio 08:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Salvio giuliano, From what I can see neither Hakz77 or MeneerTijn (in the archives) are stale. Am I missing something? -- RoySmith (talk) 14:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
