User talk:Dyolf87

Edit comments

Hi, I saw you made a series of edits to Cirth. However, you omitted to explain any of them with edit comments. Even a brief remark like "rm stray punctuation" would be helpful to other editors, and is a common practice here. It'd be much appreciated if you could comment your edits in future. Many thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:58, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a mistake I keep making! I keep forgetting to add comments, but I'm getting better. — Dyolf87 (talk) 00:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and formatting

Please see WP:RS and MOS:SMALL. Please let me know if you have any questions. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look, in the interests of not having an edit war (and strictly speaking, we made four reverts--which were two reverts each), can we please discuss your concerns on the talk page of the article? I don't see any value in going back and forth like this. Have you read WP:RS or MOS:SMALL? I think that would be a good start. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also self-reverted just now to reinclude your suggested source and posted to a noticeboard. Let's collaborate to make the encyclopedia better: sound good? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism"

First, please refrain from calling good-faith edits you disagree with "vandalism". That's not going to win you any arguments.

Second, based on your reverts at Nick Mason's Saucerful of Secrets and The Early Years 1965–1972, you don't seem to understand that everything in Wikipedia must be cited to a reliable source. Please read WP:RS and WP:V. That is why I removed large portions of the Saucerful article. Popcornfud (talk) 10:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced information

It seems like you are still adding information without a source. Why are you doing this? Have you seen WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:OR? I'm confused here. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]