Jump to content

User talk:Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 72.200.134.62 (talk) at 23:37, 11 October 2020 (You're the unconstructive one.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome To Wikipedia

Hello, Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck, good luck, and have fun. aboideautalk 22:25, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive edit

Hi, what was unconstructive about my edit to Jayda Fransen's Wikipedia page? I added that she stood down as Deputy Leader of Britain First in 2019 and edited the info box which just says she commenced her position in 2014. There's no mention of the cessation of her office. So with respect, I'm struggling to see how it isn't constructive or relevant. GrazeMaze (talk) 11:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Everett Dorr

It appears that I forgot to log in, when making this edit recently. I am only a constructive editor, and you should have noticed the discrepancy outlined in my reversion, before jumping to conclusions. Please check the facts, before making inappropriate changes in future. Editrite! (talk) 02:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Cyphoidbomb

Hello, Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck. You have new messages at Talk:Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah#Unexplained removal of content.
Message added 21:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ratandgad

Why are you delete this fort history... विशाल भवार (talk) 18:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atalanta B.C.

Hello. I changed a sentence from the Atalanta B.C. page. It said "PSG scored to late goals in the second half." and I changed it to "PSG scored two late goals in second half stoppage-time (if you know soccer, then you know what stoppage time is, but either way it is more detailed and accurate. I am new to wikipedia but this is not vandalism, as it looks fine and is accarute.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Trevscfc

Hello!

You nominated the aforementioned page for speedy deletion per WP:G10. It definitely wasn't an attack page but a promo piece, so I've gone ahead and replaced the template with {{db-g11}}. I assume you meant to use that?

Regards - Flori4nK tc 20:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mata_Sudiksha

Hi, I have made changes and submitted it back. Can you please review and let me know if it requires any further changes?

User:Joe Bassey

In response to your warning template at the editors talk page, what edit filter is considered vandalism? I also want to know why you sent a template warning 49 minutes into October 1st when the last edit filter triggered by Joe was here at 23:48, 30 September 2020, nearly an hour ago. Jerm (talk) 00:58, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further investigation, you sent another template warning @User talk:NetheriteRyRy5811 also @00:49, 1 October for trigger the edit filters. I already sent a warning three minutes after NetheriteRyRy5811 had last triggered the edit filter which was here, 23:50, 30 September. Based on what I'm seeing, you are digging too far back on the edit filters. Please withdraw your warning messages. Jerm (talk) 01:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 11:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're the unconstructive one.

Loser.