User:Rushtonskinner/Palmeral of Elche/Omnes una manet nox Peer Review
Appearance
Peer review
[edit]General info
[edit]- Rushtonskinner
- Palmeral of Elche
Lead
[edit]- The Lead has been updated from Spanish to English, reflective of the viewing population.
- The introductory sentence provides a clear, concise description of the topic. However, more detail is needed in the introduction.
- The Lead does not include a brief description of the article's major sections.
- The Lead includes information that is not present, such as the Palmeral representing the largest palm grove in Europe, most northern palm grove in the world. The size of the Palm Grove is not stated in the rest of the article.
- The Lead is succinct, but references information not representative of the article. There is no information on the canal network, which constitutes the central part of the topic.
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The content added is relevant to the topic. But possesses many gaps.
- The content added is up-to-date, but not comprehensive.
- More information is needed on the protection and threats as well as the canal network itself.
- The article does not address equity gaps or underrepresented populations.
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The content added is neutral.
- No claims appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
- No viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented, but more information is needed on the canal network from its Roman origins to Muslim and later Christian ownership.
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Reliable secondary source of information does not back up the information. More cites are needed in each of the sections.
- The sources are thorough and work, but more scholarly articles are needed. No journals or peer-reviewed articles are present. Official sites like UNESCO and World Heritage sites are present.
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The content is well-written (i.e., concise, clear, and easy to read), but incomplete.
- A few grammatical errors exist, such as "which is basically the same as the one still in use for the palm orchards." This writing is not suited to the university-level.
- The content added is well-organized, but not comprehensive. In fact, some errors exist. The Christians acquired the Palmeral de Elche in the 13th century, not the 14th century.
Organization evaluation
[edit]Images and Media
[edit]Guiding questions:
- The images enhance understanding of the topic, are well-captioned, adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations, and laid out in a visually appealing way. But more images are needed, especially ground-level views of the Palmeral. The images do not reflect the major attractions in the Palmeral (e.g., Museum, Garden), nor major vegetation. White palms, olive trees, and other crops are grown, not just date palms.