Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 May 15
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < May 14 | << Apr | May | Jun >> | May 16 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
May 15
[edit]01:57:37, 15 May 2019 review of submission by Aosmali
[edit]how and where this article looks like an advertisement ?!!!!!!!!!!!! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:MadinahScript Aosmali (talk) 01:57, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
05:39:30, 15 May 2019 review of draft by Yche3321
[edit]
I have checked the link that the editors provided. The article is called Artemisia absinthium, which only has a lttle about uses but for my article, it paid more attention on it， so it is different for our subjects of articles.
Yche3321 (talk) 05:39, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Yche3321 Greetings. Please add/merge the info from your article to Artemisia absinthium as you have been informed by 3 different reviewers at your sandbox by User:Bkissin User:Curb Safe Charmer and User:Praxidicae and by Bkissin (again) and I to merge / add info to existing article Artemisia absinthium and kindly do so. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:05, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
11:17:55, 15 May 2019 review of submission by Wp4321
[edit]
Hello, I posted an article about celette that was rejected due to some reasons I do not fully understand. I used all the appropriate links and information that was all correct. Wp4321 (talk) 11:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Wp4321. The draft cites press releases, trade journals, and a newspaper article in which an executive says a few words about the company. Such sources do nothing to demonstrate notability (suitability for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:10, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
11:56:44, 15 May 2019 review of submission by Papi Paul Poeme
[edit]
I am requesting a re-review because i want to make money
Papi Paul Poeme (talk) 11:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Papi Paul Poeme, Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:04, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
16:31:41, 15 May 2019 review of submission by Kranthi Kumar Mukkera
[edit]- Kranthi Kumar Mukkera (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Kranthi Kumar Mukkera (talk) 16:31, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
17:08:48, 15 May 2019 review of submission by Kranthi Kumar Mukkera
[edit]- Kranthi Kumar Mukkera (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Kranthi Kumar Mukkera (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
20:06:29, 15 May 2019 review of submission by Jessie Trapp
[edit]- Jessie Trapp (talk · contribs)
I made updates to keep things purely factual as my intent is not to promote MoxiWorks, but to merely define what it is. Jessie Trapp (talk) 20:06, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Jessie Trapp. Even mentioning the company on Wikipedia is likely to be seen as promotional, especially when the draft cites zero independent, reliable, secondary sources containing significant coverage of the company. You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:04, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
20:30:30, 15 May 2019 review of draft by Asherdbwiseman
[edit]
So this was rejected because I copied and pasted the episode description from Channel 4s website? Would erasing that help? What's that stuff about reliable sources? it really is a TV show that airs on Channel 4.
Asherdbwiseman (talk) 20:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Asherdbwiseman. Just because something exists does not mean it is a suitable subject for an encyclopedia article. To demonstrate notability (suitability for inclusion), multiple, independent, reliable sources are needed that contain significant information about the topic. The channel's website (as well as the show's, the producer's, the star's, etc.) may be reliable, but are not independent - they have a vested interest in promoting the show. Reliable and independent sources would be something like reviews in The Guardian or The Times, or a scholarly book that contains a page or two about the show. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:58, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
22:50:33, 15 May 2019 review of submission by Ryan Mindo
[edit]- Ryan Mindo (talk · contribs)
Ryan Mindo (talk) 22:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Ryan Mindo: - this both completely lacked sources, so couldn't demonstrate notability, and was heavily promotional. As such the review was right to reject it Nosebagbear (talk) 15:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)