User talk:CNMall41
| This is CNMall41's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Connected Distributor
How should i fix this WP:COI Issue please help in detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShashankChandel1 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- It is spelled out for at WP:PAID. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nike Grind Logo.png
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
About my article javed Khan magician
Hi @CNMall41,
Thank you for your feedback on my article. you mentioned that its about myself, well yes I did some notable achievement which were covered and i am a verified public figure in my country,across all social media and other media as well. So i believe that doesn't make it a normal article. Let me know if that is OK or not ? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Javed khan39 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Help
Hi. I ask you to review the Moldova Liberă questionnaire and, if possible, approve it. I will be very grateful, as it takes a very long time to wait. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Moldova_Liber%C4%83 Infpro (talk) 17:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Submission are reviewed in time by various editors. Patience is important when submitting a draft. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:23, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
why did you reject the Dgraph piece?
You rejected https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dgraph It is functionally identical to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo4j It is significant technology with a significant pedigree, funding, clients, news coverage, how-to articles on hackernoon and medium. I spoke with Blablubbs11 on IRC to find out more and he said it looked fine and I should submit it for approval.
I ran across this whole problem while researching graph databases for a project at work and for some reason Dgraph wasn't there, despite being a pure golang implementation and a native graphql language, which was also notable. This decision to not allow an entry is just bizarre. Please reconsider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smga3000 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- Being "functionally identical" isn't a Wikipedia guideline. See WP:OSE. The decline was for the reason stated on the draft. If you can fix those issues I would be happy to review it again but as it stands cannot approve it. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)--CNMall41 (talk) 01:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- In fact, I just checked and see that NOTHING has been to the draft to address the concerns of both reviewers who declined it. I would suggest correcting those issues prior to asking for a review. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)--CNMall41 (talk) 01:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Envato draft rejection
Hi there, thanks for taking the time to review the Envato page I had submitted. Can I clarify: my understanding after reviewing the original deleted post (from last year was it?) is that there wasn't enough independent sources and the like; too many links back to the Envato website, blog etc. So I tried really hard to find the independent sources such pages need from across mainstream media and tech etc, and I thought it was substantially improved, especially the body text given the last version was, well, very marketing-speak? With "published, reliable secondary sources," can you clarify which of the links I had used as sources don't meet this threshold? I tried to compare the page to other competitors like Canva, Shutterstock, Creative Market and it seems like they have similar source bases. Definitely, it has better sourcing on page than that of the company it apparently bought (Twenty20). I'd love to resubmit it at some point but I know I need to get this bit right! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daveoftheinternet (talk • contribs) 05:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Based on your questions, I am not sure you read through the link I provided at WP:ORGCRIT. If you can review that and tell me which links in the draft meet that threshold I will gladly take another look. Thanks. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:36, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Burp Suite Draft rejection
Thanks for your input, much appreciated. I've done my best to pare it down to just descriptive NPOV and added additional reliable sources referencing this admittedly commercial product. From what I can tell, this should be not be seen as an advert, certainly when comparing with similar products within the ethical hacking community Nessus (software). Please confirm this is inline with WP guidance. Mvb71 (talk) 02:25, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- There were two issues. The other was referencing which still doesnt look like it was addressed. As far as NPOV, it has nothing to do with being neutral but more with the way the draft reads like an instruction manual or brochure instead of an encyclopedia article. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Ray William Johnson Talk Page
Please check my discussion on the YouTube infobox of Ray William Johnson Nintendoswitchfan (talk) 09:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I ask for your help in correcting the advertising style of the article. I don't understand English very well and it's very difficult for me to understand what exactly needs to be corrected to get rid of this problem. I ask for your help as an experienced editor. Thank you very much! 2A00:1FA1:137:7985:F18B:4A4F:48B8:B821 (talk) 08:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)