Jump to content

User talk:174.212.238.55

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 174.212.238.55 (talk) at 19:37, 30 October 2020 (Canada Border Services Agency: ce). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

October 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Firestar464. I noticed that you recently removed content from Canada Border Services Agency without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Firestar464 (talk) 03:16, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Canada Border Services Agency

You could logically remove the second paragraph as it was unsourced; however, the first paragraph was sourced, therefore removal was not necessary. Firestar464 (talk) 07:24, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Firestar464, what in the world are you talking about? Neither I, nor anyone from this entire IP range have ever edited an article by that name. You did recently incorrectly revert an edit I made. It wasn't unexplained, it was entirely good faith and entirely proper. If you contest my removal of that content, follow WP:BRD and go make arguments for inclusion on the article talk page. If not, leave it alone please. It isn't vandalism, and from your talk page its pretty clear you are not clearly understanding what is. 174.212.238.55 (talk) 07:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Something's off here. First, you say that you didn't edit the article, but then you later say "If you contest my removal of that content". Also, I wasn't thinking "vandalism" when I reverted your edit. I was more sort of thinking WP:NOTCENSORED rather than just random blanking. Thirdly, please do not gravedance about my talk page. Thank you. Regards, Firestar464 (talk) 07:40, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Firestar464, you might want to learn what terms mean before you use them (re:WP:GRAVEDANCING); and you need to read comments before you reply to them. I clearly stated that I was talking about a seperate issue. I've never edited an article titled Huawei. I'll read your talk page any time I want and so will anyone else in the whole world. If appropriate, I'll comment on it. What makes you think I shouldn't? It isn't private, and what you do here is subject to peer review.
If you objected to my removal of that content as NOTNEWS, there is no circumstance when reverting it is proper. You contest it on the talk page. I agree with the others on your talk. Slow down and get help. It appears there's another editor offering to help you. You should consider his offer. Your repeated (and, yes, I've reviewed your edits) misapplication of WP:PAG is problematic. Combine that with the status in the hierarchy in Wikiland of those commenting on your talk page and it's quite possible you won't be here long if you don't. Just a piece of advice. Do with it what you want. 174.212.238.55 (talk) 08:11, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Let me apologize; it wasn't about an article titled Huawei but the Canadian Border Services Agency article. However, please comment on content, not fellow editors. Thank you. Firestar464 (talk) 09:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And yet another misapplication of policy. On an article talk page, when discussing content issues, it is inappropriate to discuss other editors. This discussion is not about content. You started it, discussing my behavior. Your claim my edit was out of policy is false. You've not attempted to expand on that or defend your position. You've not attempted to start a discussion to settle any content issues on the article's talk page. So if you cannot comment on other editors behavior on a user talk page, how is the warning you issued me appropriate? This isn't a game. Your peers here are your boss. There aren't managers. No one is picking on you. To a person,

everyone posting on your talk is trying to help you succeed here. Please listen to what you are being told.174.212.238.55 (talk) 19:14, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]