Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019–20 Budafoki MTE season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Fenix down (talk) 07:27, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2019–20 Budafoki MTE season

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All fail WP:GNG and WP:NSEASONS

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 13:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 18:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep As SportingFlyer said for the next season, the Hungarian second division receives enough secondary press coverage that these seasons likely pass WP:GNG and each needs to be considered on their own merits. WP:NSEASONS is not exclusionary. Ludost Mlačani (talk) 09:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you provide evidence to support this assertion? Spiderone 19:00, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Canysp: are you able to link us to any secondary sources covering these league seasons in depth? Spiderone 13:28, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NSEASONS failure. Number 5 7 12:22, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing about WP:NSEASONS is exclusionary. Ludost Mlačani (talk) 15:24, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct about NSEASONS not being exclusionary but GNG most definitely is exclusionary Spiderone 11:52, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets NSEASONS playing (and being promoted) in a top professional league that typically gets extensive media coverage - which also means it easily meets GNG (even without the extra coverage of Covid delays and promotion. Examples are one, two, and three. Nfitz (talk) 23:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.