User talk:CNMall41

This is CNMall41's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Archives

Connected Distributor

How should i fix this WP:COI Issue please help in detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShashankChandel1 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is spelled out for at WP:PAID. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nike Grind Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nike Grind Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About my article javed Khan magician

Hi @CNMall41,

Thank you for your feedback on my article. you mentioned that its about myself, well yes I did some notable achievement which were covered and i am a verified public figure in my country,across all social media and other media as well. So i believe that doesn't make it a normal article. Let me know if that is OK or not ? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Javed khan39 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hi. I ask you to review the Moldova Liberă questionnaire and, if possible, approve it. I will be very grateful, as it takes a very long time to wait. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Moldova_Liber%C4%83 Infpro (talk) 17:30, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Submission are reviewed in time by various editors. Patience is important when submitting a draft. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:23, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

why did you reject the Dgraph piece?

You rejected https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dgraph It is functionally identical to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo4j It is significant technology with a significant pedigree, funding, clients, news coverage, how-to articles on hackernoon and medium. I spoke with Blablubbs11 on IRC to find out more and he said it looked fine and I should submit it for approval.

I ran across this whole problem while researching graph databases for a project at work and for some reason Dgraph wasn't there, despite being a pure golang implementation and a native graphql language, which was also notable. This decision to not allow an entry is just bizarre. Please reconsider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smga3000 (talk • contribs) 01:31, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Being "functionally identical" isn't a Wikipedia guideline. See WP:OSE. The decline was for the reason stated on the draft. If you can fix those issues I would be happy to review it again but as it stands cannot approve it. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)--CNMall41 (talk) 01:46, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I just checked and see that NOTHING has been to the draft to address the concerns of both reviewers who declined it. I would suggest correcting those issues prior to asking for a review. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)--CNMall41 (talk) 01:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Envato draft rejection

Hi there, thanks for taking the time to review the Envato page I had submitted. Can I clarify: my understanding after reviewing the original deleted post (from last year was it?) is that there wasn't enough independent sources and the like; too many links back to the Envato website, blog etc. So I tried really hard to find the independent sources such pages need from across mainstream media and tech etc, and I thought it was substantially improved, especially the body text given the last version was, well, very marketing-speak? With "published, reliable secondary sources," can you clarify which of the links I had used as sources don't meet this threshold? I tried to compare the page to other competitors like Canva, Shutterstock, Creative Market and it seems like they have similar source bases. Definitely, it has better sourcing on page than that of the company it apparently bought (Twenty20). I'd love to resubmit it at some point but I know I need to get this bit right! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daveoftheinternet (talk • contribs) 05:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your questions, I am not sure you read through the link I provided at WP:ORGCRIT. If you can review that and tell me which links in the draft meet that threshold I will gladly take another look. Thanks. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:36, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Burp Suite Draft rejection

Thanks for your input, much appreciated. I've done my best to pare it down to just descriptive NPOV and added additional reliable sources referencing this admittedly commercial product. From what I can tell, this should be not be seen as an advert, certainly when comparing with similar products within the ethical hacking community Nessus (software). Please confirm this is inline with WP guidance. Mvb71 (talk) 02:25, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There were two issues. The other was referencing which still doesnt look like it was addressed. As far as NPOV, it has nothing to do with being neutral but more with the way the draft reads like an instruction manual or brochure instead of an encyclopedia article. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ray William Johnson Talk Page

Please check my discussion on the YouTube infobox of Ray William Johnson Nintendoswitchfan (talk) 09:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dmitry Borisovich Volkov

Hello. I ask for your help in correcting the advertising style of the article. I don't understand English very well and it's very difficult for me to understand what exactly needs to be corrected to get rid of this problem. I ask for your help as an experienced editor. Thank you very much! 2A00:1FA1:137:7985:F18B:4A4F:48B8:B821 (talk) 08:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't actually review this draft so I don't know the specific areas of advertising. However, I also see you reached out to several others and hopefully they have been able to opine. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very much counting on your help. I am not a native English speaker and it is very difficult for me to determine the style of the article and understand what needs to be corrected. Please look at the article with your professional eyes and help us make adjustments. I will be very grateful to you! 2A00:1FA1:4239:CCBA:1838:581A:FF27:5C8C (talk) 16:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "us?" Are you from a company or assisting Dmitry with the article?--CNMall41 (talk) 18:31, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my bad english. These are my mistakes in translation. 2A00:1FA1:4025:1393:F8B3:4675:B190:375 (talk) 18:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but can you please answer the question?--CNMall41 (talk) 19:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have nothing to do with this person, and even more so with the company. 2A00:1FA1:4025:1393:F8B3:4675:B190:375 (talk) 19:41, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Can you help? I repeat that I am asking you for help because I am not an English speaker and it is difficult for me to understand the presentation style of the article. I sincerely ask you for help and it will be very easy for you to do this, but impossible for me. Many thanks. 2A00:1FA1:41C0:915:A4F0:785B:8C99:9B0E (talk) 11:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the draft and it appears you have a better grasp for English than you present in your messages above. That is, unless someone else wrote the draft on your behalf. It is not a topic I am familiar with so I will allow you to work on it or hopefully some of the other editors you have reached out to will assist as well. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Draft talk:Scott Dadich on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:EuroGeoSurveys page - submission declined

Hi CNMall41,

Thank you for reviewing the EuroGeoSurveys page I submitted some months ago. Since July, the submission of the EuroGeoSurveys page on Wikipedia has been an ongoing effort which has not unfortunately payed back yet. Following the last message you submitted when declining the draft, may I please ask you to let me know in which way the sources I submitted are not reliable or not possible to verify?

Since I would like to speed up the process, I would like to to arrange a meeting with you outside the Wikipedia platform, in case this is not against your policy. In case feasible, I will privately share the details of the EuroGeoSurveys Secretary General in order to facilitate a communication exchange or a call.

Thank you.

ErikaErika.maugeri (talk) 14:17, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]