Jump to content

User:Sa2001oki/Choose an Article

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Sa2001oki (talk | contribs) at 12:07, 4 November 2020 (added necessary paragraphs to its appropriate sections). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Article Selection

[edit]

Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

[edit]
Article title
Water resource management
Article Evaluation
Neutrality can be seen throughout the whole article. However, there seems to be room for improvement in the organisation and flow of the paragraphs as the "overview" and the section before it is confusing. The content of the two sections seem to be capable of being merged together. In addition, the small number of sources that are cited tell us that there is room for more citations to be added and more sources to be referred to. The good thing is that there seems to be several different authors of the sources mentioned in "references".
Sources
The links in the references section work fine.

Option 2

[edit]
Article title
Integrated water resources management
Article Evaluation
There are only three sections to this article and only a few references, some even being from the same authors/sites, therefore, there definitely seems to be room for improvement. Although at this point, there seems to be no problem with neutrality in this article, it is very short that one would assume that there is not enough information being covered on this topic.
Sources
There are no problems with the links.

Option 3

[edit]
Article title
Environmental issues in Nepal
Article Evaluation
The order of the subtopics are confusing, so the article can be improved by rearranging some of the subsections. Additionally, the subtopics seem to be going back and forth with no clear indication of what kind of direction the article is intended to go. In addition to the lack of sources that are cited, the information on this page is not up-to-date. There is a section mentioning the environmental issues "as of 2005" which is 15 years ago. The information should be updated as environmental situations do not stay the same for years and are constantly changing.
Sources
The links work fine and they take me to the appropriate sites.

Option 4

[edit]
Article title
Article Evaluation
Sources

Option 5

[edit]
Article title
Article Evaluation
Sources