Jump to content

Talk:Michelle Smith (fashion designer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Innisfree987 (talk | contribs) at 22:12, 16 November 2020 (“Official portrait”: Replying to Ravenpuff (using reply-link)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk21:26, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewed: Journey of the Sorcerer
  • Comment: This entry is ripe for illustration but unfortunately the portait is a non-free image and I haven’t been able to find a different image of one of Smith’s other design to pair with an alternative hook.

Created by Innisfree987 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:36, 31 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Interesting life and work, on fine sources, no copyvio obvious. I think the original hook is more unique than the other. How about adding to the nice fact that Obama chose her if I understand the dress article right. ... or the meaning of the quilt tradition? ... or the woman artist? - some spice ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this review Gerda Arendt! I agree. I’ll continue to punch up the hook options as well as complete the QPQ and then ping with the update! Innisfree987 (talk) 01:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, new options but I struggled to be pithy! If you have suggestions for trimming the wording, Gerda Arendt, by all means, I’d welcome it! Innisfree987 (talk) 03:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for struggling, and I can see better why, and almost feel sorry for having asked. However, this is such a good topic that - if you like - you might be willing to struggle further? Or go for featured article, and then you can say a bit more ;) - I could approve ALT0A once a qpq is provided. My take on that one is
ALT0D: ... that Michelle Smith learned only when Michelle Obama's official portrait was unveiled that a dress from her collection had been chosen for the sitting?
Please put further suggestions below (if any), - easier for the prep builder. I see that to speak of Mondrian and quilts - to say something about the actual design which we can unfortunately not show - is too hard for a short sentence, because another person is involved who needs to be mentioned. Striking those unless you can condense them in ALTs. I also don't read that the artist was "inspired", only "reminded". Striking the National Gallery because I understand that all these gowns (nice word in the article!) go there - too little about Smith. The article doesn't say that Obama (in person) made the selection. Change that, or change ALT0C if you want to go that way. - DYK that your name reminds me of this wonderful place, with a poor article in English? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:56, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I do think it’s a good topic (I started out just wanting to give a little write-up and now think it could satisfy GA at least!) but I’m still struggling to make it snappy. Best I could do is:
ALT0E: ... that the unveiling of Michelle Obama’s official portrait surprised Michelle Smith with the news that a gown from her collection had been chosen for the sitting?
But either of the other two remaining options work for me too—at this point I don’t think I’m likely to come up with something shorter. QPQ is set, I had just misformatted-sorry about that! And thank you for the pointer to that lovely garden. Over the years I have learned several different meanings of my name! A pleasure of the project. Innisfree987 (talk) 22:21, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I left D and E for the prep builder, thinking that E flows better. - Yes, a pleasure! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

“Official portrait”

Hi Ravenpuff, thank you for your work brushing up this and related entries. I wanted to touch base about the term “official portrait”. To me it’s important to include because that’s how it’s recurrently characterized in secondary sources and I think without it, an important aspect of the significance may be lost to the general audience (which is, I would guess, also why so many sources use it. Even as someone interested in the topic, a portrait for a portrait gallery doesn’t sound to me like it’s nearly as important as this commission was.) Could we say “official portrait for the National Portrait Gallery” to keep the specificity that you are pointing out while retaining fidelity to the sources and conveying the significance to the reader? Innisfree987 (talk) 20:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Innisfree987: Sure, that seems fine to me; I've re-added the word "official" at least into the lead. As long as we don't use just "official portrait" without qualification (for reasons of specificity etc.), I don't think that should be controversial. FYI, I've also placed a report at WP:ERRORS about this same technicality in the article's DYK hook. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 21:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ravenpuff, appreciate your flagging, I’ve replied there. Thank you for your collaboration on this! Innisfree987 (talk) 22:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]