User talk:SoothingRelaxation

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SoothingRelaxation, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SoothingRelaxation! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, SoothingRelaxation, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Draft:Tara Smith did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 03:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tara Smith (developer) (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has a disambiguated title.

If this draft is accepted, an entry will need to be added to the disambiguation page for the primary name.

The disambiguation page for the primary name is Tara Smith.

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:GNG for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tara Smith (developer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tara Smith (developer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:29, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft: Tara Smith, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. AFC decline notices say that they should not be removed. That is because they provide a history for the reviewers. Do not remove them. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 05:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MarnetteD: Sorry, I thought he died! --SoothingRelaxation (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've been refreshing my Google search for 15 minutes. IMO the death of someone with as big of a public profile as Baker would hit the news fairly quickly. That is a major reason why a source is needed. Regards. MarnetteD|Talk 05:26, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --SoothingRelaxation (talk) 05:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw this kind person. Where did you get the information from? I can't see it online. Please add a reference or remove it. Whispyhistory (talk) 07:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Sinha

A YouTube video is not a reliable source for referencing content in a biography of a living person - especially content that claims that the person has died. Please review Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people and the references required, and please let me know if you have any questions. You can message me by visiting my user talk page. Thanks! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:52, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: Thank you for letting me know! Plus, I'm your biggest fan! --SoothingRelaxation (talk) 16:43, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the kind words. :-) Please don't hesitate to let me know if you have questions or need help with anything, and I'll be happy to lend a hand. Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

]

Nomination of Rosie Banks (author) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosie Banks (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosie Banks (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrKay (talk) 11:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit-warring and disruptive editing at Chills (YouTuber), apparent hoaxing at Rosie Banks (author), harassment at User talk:Captain Calm and unacceptable behavior at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chills (YouTuber). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 20:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

@Oshwah: DrKay blocked me for no reason. Just because I removed a deletion tag off Chills (YouTuber). He is famous and has 5.33 million subscribers. I even added at least one reliable source. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCN64HIrZNqFQYZ2BuyY-4zg --SoothingRelaxation (talk) 20:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I endorse the block - the vandalism at this AFD page was grounds for a "final warning" all by itself even if you hadn't had any other problems, which you did, removing that deletion tag you mentioned not once but 3 times, one short of a WP:3RR block (since your edit was itself improper, 3RR did not apply to reverting it). This is only a 3-day block, you'll be able to edit before the AFD expires. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read before you come back in 3 days

Welcome to Wikipedia. We were all new editors once. Well, maybe not Jimbo Wales, some say he was a Wiki-greybeard since before he founded it. *joke*

I've taken a quick skim through Special:Contributions/SoothingRelaxation and it looks like you still haven't quite gotten the hang of how things work around here.

Wikipedia is a collaborative project with - and I'm guessing here but I'm probably guessing on the low side - thousands of participants in any given day. This means we have to have some rules that each of us needs to follow.

Before you come back, please read Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines, Wikipedia:Core content policies, Wikipedia:List of policies, and Wikipedia:List of guidelines. In particular, read the policies and guidelines related to conduct and behavior, and those related to content.

An tutorial for new users is available at Help:Introduction to policies and guidelines. You might also find Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset helpful. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:10, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I made a slight change to your user page because of this rule. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing. You were recently blocked for edit-warring, disruptive editing and removing AfD tags. Two days after coming off the block: you remove an Afd tag and edit-war. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 20:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

British vs. American English

Thank you for your attention to detail in fixing spelling and other errors.

However, sometimes an error isn't an error at all, but a regional difference in language.

In articles about "American" topics, "American" spelling is used. Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English has some guidance in this area.

I undid some of the spelling changes that you did in this edit.

Again, thank you for your diligence. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]