Jump to content

Talk:Integrated water resources management

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sa2001oki (talk | contribs) at 01:03, 23 November 2020 (suggestion of revision). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconSanitation NA‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 October 2020 and 29 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mbastola, Teruhiro Shigeno, Sa2001oki (article contribs).

This page needs a reference. 202.6.56.2 04:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what are they? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.53.38.219 (talk) 09:14, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


they are 4 statements made in 1992 in a conference held in dublin, but they are not related to IWRM, as stated in the paper "Integrated water resources management - a reassessment ", by biswas, 2009. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.180.58.238 (talk) 09:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Add 'Status of IWRM Implementation'

I think it would be better to add a new section with the title 'Status of IWRM Implementation'. Under this title, we will be writing the degree of IWRM implementation in reference to the SDGs data. It will be categorized on the basis of the continent. --Mbastola (talk) 03:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is a great suggestion. Sa2001oki (talk) 01:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The lead should include the main points of the article. The lead at the moement may be lacking a few important takeaways of the article so we must revise it and add to it.