User talk:Redman19
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Redman19. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Prime Minister's Cup
Hello Redman19, would you give your opinion on this matter here: Talk:Chancellor Cup? Thank you. Akocsg (talk) 18:14, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Flag
I reverted you because it seems like the other editor disputing the flag was ok with the removal after seeing that I a section about it to the article (and moved the image to that section) — so you are the only one disputing it for now, and the other two editors have reached agreement — I've opened discussion on talk about possibly changing the lede picture and explaining the reason for the removal in more detail. Seraphim System (talk) 22:29, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Opinion concerning FL candidate article
Hello Redman, I would really appreciate it if you would give your opinion concerning this topic: Featured List candidate. And there is also the issue of copyright here, could you help me there? Birbirimize yardimci olalim, ilk konuda destek mesaji yazarsan cok sevinirim, eski sampiyonluklarla alakali. Ikinci konu da degerli resimlerle alakali, görünce anlarsin zaten. Best regards, Akocsg (talk) 14:28, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Could Use Your Eyes
Hail Redman,
Dragut has had some activity recently, not all of it good, would you mind coming over to have a look?
Thanks, --Cdfi (talk) 14:30, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Looking good my friend, keep up the good work. Redman19 (talk) 12:09, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Ahmet Saffet Ohkay moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ahmet Saffet Ohkay, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering 15:23, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Redman19. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmet Saffet Ohkay has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac (talk) 04:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
View from Russia:
Too clever and tricky is when someone does not write that 3% for imports and 12% for exports.
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Hello
Hello Redman19, I was reading some articles today. Then I came across your userpage and i was sad to see your statement that you quit editing actively. Although acknowledging the fact that it's getting more difficult everyday to contribute this website without getting pissed off (you probably know what I mean), I'd like to encourage you to continue to contribute, specially in fields which are under your interest those need your continuous help or, at least, supervision. I hope this message will convince you. Regards. Isik (talk) 15:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you Isik, I think I am aware of what you mean, I do not wish to engage in edit wars, I sense an anti Turkish sentiment on Wiki, I choose to stay silent, because my experience tells me that trolls always win, kind regards. Redman19 (talk) 10:42, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Redman. I understand your concern and agree with you. The website is too politicized in recent years, exposed to complicated policies and probably there are many paid editors as I can't figure out how a person can enter thousands of edits in a year unless having a depressed life in a basement or being paid for it. I don't have a much appetite either, but sometimes I need myself to act to add factful information in area of certain interests, especially national interests. Anyways, I appreciate you continue to contribute regardless it's level. I uploaded this image yesterday. Taken in 1950, it's a public domain according to related local law. I, however, couldn't find how to label related tag of public domain reference. Could you kindly have a look in image and improve its legal status, please? Thank you and regards. Isik (talk) 09:10, 18 August 2020 (UTC)