Jump to content

Talk:List of disk drive form factors

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JohnOwens (talk | contribs) at 17:27, 8 December 2020 (Suggested Punctuation: Ambiguous Note/Reference Superscript?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconComputing Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of disk drive form factors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

With regarded to largest 8" size been unknown. Fujitsu did produce the M2392 for OEM use in 1989 with a capacity of 2.0GB see: https://books.google.ie/books?id=knLofWownIIC&pg=PA44&dq=fujitsu+M2392&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjD6K3sn7fcAhVB2aQKHTgFCu4Q6AEILTAB#v=onepage&q=fujitsu%20M2392&f=false

They OEM it to at least DEC and Unisys going by a list on Bitsavers: M2392D 2.0GB 8" SMD DEC M2392K 2GB 8" SMD M2392KU 2.0GB 8" SMD UNISYS http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/fujitsu/disk/FujitsuDriveList.txt — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4B0:2:2:0:0:0:119 (talk) 07:54, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

The title of the page suggests disk drives in a general sense, but the content seems to focus almost entirely on hard disk drives. Many of the same form factors exist for other drive types, and are not obsolete. I'm not sure if the title can be changed to something that reflects the content more accurately, but if it cannot, at least some mention of other types of drives deserves some mention.

Suggested Punctuation: Ambiguous Note/Reference Superscript?

At least to me, the superscripted notes/references, in the list of heights of the 2.5-inch form factor appears ambiguous: the superscripted index number appears after the comma, suggesting that it should apply to the next item in the list, but the space after the superscripted index suggests that it should apply to previous item, as either a comma or whitespace could separate items in a list.

It seems to actually be applying to the item to the left of it.

Would this be the standard format of Wikipedia, or may we edit the article?

I was thinking of ordering the items in the list in this way: "item, superscript, comma (optional (for inner/last list item))". It would appear like this: "item[super],".

Thanks!

According to Template:Citation needed, "This template… is installed with no spaces directly after punctuation." I have mixed feelings about it myself, but that's the standard here. -- J. Randall Owens (talk) 17:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested addition: screw hole spacing and thread types

I'm fairly certain these have been standardized too according to a size, however as the information is a bit difficult to find, it would be nice and convenient to find it in an article like this! Viileeditor (talk) 11:41, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]