Talk:Alicia Garza

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Devinasen.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Black Lives Matter

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Lives Matter, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Black Lives Matter on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Black Lives MatterWikipedia:WikiProject Black Lives MatterTemplate:WikiProject Black Lives MatterBlack Lives Matter
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 October 2015. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 September 2019 and 17 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): De.small1, Viki.vick, LukieW, Will5590 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Piepe074, Noraschulz100, Ladwi047, Carl5129, GVR117.

Peer Edits

The information added to the Alicia Garza Wikipedia page is relevant to the topic. Having a section for notable speeches makes it easier for people to trace her growth and popularity as well as sources of some videos and memorable quotes of her speeches. How do you plan on distinguishing which of her speeches/appearances count as notable and worthy of adding to the Wikipedia page? The tone of the writing is neutral and fits the tone of the rest of the page. Is there any details you can add about her work with the Bay Area organizations outlined in the "Other Work" section (i.e. start and end dates, location, type of work)? Sources are decent, can you find any sources other than the YouTube videos that maybe discuss why thosehello speeches are relevant? Great work :) Devinasen (talk) 22:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marxist? Not seeing it

I have removed a citation to a piece about Garza written by Tiana Smith, a college student who volunteers at BlackPast.org. BlackPast is an online encyclopedia,[1] but not all of its entries are from established historians. The BlackPast piece about Garza said she was Marxist,[2] but it held no supporting quotes or documentation to support that label. Unless there's an explicit quote or analysis from a reliable source, we must remove the label. Binksternet (talk) 14:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty clear that she is. Opal Tometi, another co-founder of BLM, has also visited with Nicolás Maduro, and his ruling PSUV party is inspired by Marxism. So while there may not be an explicit quote with her stating such (at least so far), she associates with people that have met with people inspired and guided by Marxism. Although, I agree, it would be helpful to have an explicit statement to absolutely confirm this. 2601:8C:4581:1150:806A:ADEB:FDCE:4186 (talk) 05:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps as "She was described by BLM co-founder Patrisse Cullors as a 'trained Marxist'" https://web.archive.org/web/20150724223101/http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=14319. I think this is more than hearsay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.208.116.95 (talk) 21:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you do an Internet search on what groups are spreading this video and information about the subject, they are all on the conservative side and it seems to be part of a campaign to discredit Black Lives Matter. The video in question is from 2015, and doesn't provide any context about what that comment means, or how it relates to BLM as an organization. It could be one of several training sessions in a variety of ideology done by the subject. And just because a leader might believe a certain way, that doesn't mean the movement as a whole is that way. I can't find a more recent source where the supposed "Marxist" training is mentioned. Mdus5678 (talk) 04:33, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Right, because OANN didn't report on it. Oh, wait silly me. OANN isn't a "credible source" because they don't support the liberal narrative, and bow to the threat of cancel culture.

Does this count? https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:644:8b00:def0:95e7:99bc:56be:62db (talk • contribs)

The New York Post is not very reliable or credible.[3] I would not use that source.

My main problem with any mention of the word Marxism or Marxist in this biography article is that sources will not typically sift through the three meanings of Marxism to determine which one is being used.

Which fuels my second-biggest complaint about the word: folks bringing it here are not trying to represent fairly the thoughts and methods of BLM founders. Instead, they seek to plaster a single label on them in order to discredit them. Such people are assuming the worst of the three possible definitions of Marxism. They will take this definition outside of Wikipedia and shout it as an attack on the character of the BLM founders. One guy who put Marxism into the biography of Patrisse Cullors has very little other activity on Wikipedia, but he changed "white supremacist" to "white identitarian", he sympathetically reworded a white supremacist biography of Mike Cernovich to remove the idea of conspiracy, he removed conspiracy from the biography of hate speech fomenter Gemma O'Doherty, he added one nationalfile.com right-wing batshit crazy source to the biography of black activist Raz Simone, and he removed a mainstream CNN reference from the biography of white supremacist John Michael Posobiec III. So in this light, the addition of 'Marxism' to the biographies of BLM founders can be seen as a continuation of white supremacist activism on Wikipedia.

If we are to bring the word Marxism into a BLM biography, it should be accompanied with so much context from so many sources that it becomes clear to the reader which definition of Marxism is being discussed. Binksternet (talk) 02:59, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a published list of what the Wikipedia gatekeepers consider to be “reliable sources”? Citing “unreliable source” seems to be the default fall back position for any content that does not follow the very left leaning narrative for any article. Anthony Branyan (talk) 16:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure you're seeing what is my main concern: that not enough context is being given by the sources to help the reader know which of three definitions of Marxism is being discussed.

Your assumption about Wikipedia being "left leaning" is a standard talking point of Breitbart. And the scope of that assumption is too big to discuss here on the biography page of one person. Binksternet (talk) 17:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Binksternet seems to be more concerned with shielding individuals from any potential criticism than providing accurate informationMelaniasmelons (talk) 14:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marxism is being thrown off the Patrisse Cullors article for the very poor sourcing reasons. Gleeanon409 (talk) 14:23, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Jewish stepfather and an African American mother"

This pushes the false claim that a person cannot be both African American and Jewish, and ought to be reworded. What was her mother's religion? פֿינצטערניש (Fintsternish), she/her (talk) 19:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish in this sentence is denoting ethnicity. Subsequently, there are no demoninations where being raised by a Jewish stepfather and gentile mother confers Jewishness, without also undergoing conversion with a sponsoring synagogue. Garza has never attested or demonstrated conversion or even practice of the faith. The activist media sources listing her as such are faulty. Strgydides (talk) 20:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Jewish source published this sentence: "For Garza, the personal is political: raised by her African-American mother and Jewish stepfather, she grew up as Alicia Schwartz and identifies as Jewish." It's a biographical page which appears to be written by Jewish Women's Archive staff, based on communication with Garza. Binksternet (talk) 23:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No savvy organization is going question or critique a BLM activist on anything identity-related at present. Even if they are dubious in private. "Identifying as Jewish" is meaningless without ancestry or recognized conversion by a congregation. The same standard would apply were I to claim I'm African American by adoption or alternatively, Muslim without practicing. Strgydides (talk) 22:33, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]