Talk:Virgin Money UK
Appearance
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Should the UK article be Virgin Money?
Given the increased size of the new Virgin Money UK, that includes 6 million customers (massively larger than the other international operations), should the main Virgin Money article be about the UK bank, with the current summary page being moved to something like Virgin Money (brand)?
Looking at the page views there is a suspicious trend that might indicate that people who go to Virgin Money are indeed really wanting Virgin Money UK. TubularWorld (talk) 16:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- B-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Mid-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- B-Class Brands articles
- Unknown-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- B-Class North East England articles
- Low-importance North East England articles