Jump to content

User talk:LMPAJ

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LMPAJ (talk | contribs) at 18:29, 12 January 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello LMPAJ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 18:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hector Carlos Lora (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Hector Carlos Lora instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, LMPAJ! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Information icon

Hello LMPAJ. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:LMPAJ. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=LMPAJ|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 Praxidicae (talk) 17:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LMPAJ has clearly denied PAID and COI on User page, and that should be taken at face value unless there is evidence to the contrary. David notMD (talk) 15:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Writing about topics close to your heart

I saw your user page.

One of the reasons that the WP:Conflict of interest guideline exists is that it's harder to write objectively about things you care about than things that are not "near and dear to your heart."

It might help to think about each edit you make to topics related to Passaic from the point of view of someone who assumes you are writing "for the purposes of promotion" before you publish the edit. Hopefully, this will result in all of your edits being appropriate, neutral, not giving undue weight to something, and otherwise being more encyclopedic than they would be if you don't "play devil's advocate" with your edits. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice, I am really glad about it and will take it into consideration. I am most definitely keeping my thoughts objective after feedback from reviewers :). LMPAJ (talk) 18:10, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hector Carlos Lora (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
The author of this draft created this draft in draft space and also created Hector Carlos Lora in article space. It is neither necessary nor useful to create two copies of an article. It is sometimes done in order to game the system, and it annoys the reviewers. Hector Carlos Lora was then redirected to Passaic, New Jersey. Discuss at Talk:Hector Carlos Lora. Do not resubmit this draft. Discuss at Talk:Hector Carlos Lora.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 21:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Next Steps

You asked, at User talk:78.26, what to do next. Here are my two suggestions. First, start a discussion at Talk:Passaic, New Jersey. Second, tag the redirect at Hector Carlos Lozada for deletion, which will start a discussion at Redirects for Discussion. Do one or the other, not both, or you will confuse people. That is my advice. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: Thank you, Robert, I am glad for your help. I would like to follow your earlier advice and strengthen the sources so as to meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Once I do that, would you be willing to take a look? I'd be forever grateful. Then I would feel better about undergoing a general discussion since I would stand a better chance. LMPAJ (talk) 17:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Huracán Alex (2016) to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Please post this at es.wikipedia.org with the attribution. Spiderone 16:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention! I did not notice I had done this. I'll post it in the Spanish Wikipedia.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LMPAJ&oldid=999938361"