Jump to content

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Carroll v. Trump
CourtUnited States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Full case name E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump
Docket nos.20-cv-07311
22-cv-10016
Verdict
  • Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation
  • Carroll II: $5 million damages
  • Carroll I: $83.3 million damages
Court membership
Judge sittingLewis A. Kaplan

E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump is the name of two related lawsuits by author E. Jean Carroll against Donald Trump, who served as the 45th president of the United States and current president-elect of the United States. The two suits resulted in a total of $88.3 million in damages awarded to Carroll; both cases are under appeal. Both cases were related to Carroll's accusation from mid-2019 (while Trump was in office) that he sexually assaulted her in late 1995 or early 1996. Trump denied the allegations, prompting Carroll to sue him for defamation in November 2019 (a.k.a. Carroll I).

In November 2022, Carroll filed her second suit against Trump (a.k.a. Carroll II), renewing her claim of defamation and adding a claim of battery under the Adult Survivors Act, a New York law allowing sexual-assault victims to file civil suits beyond expired statutes of limitations. This suit went to trial in April 2023. Evidence included testimony from two friends Carroll spoke to after the incident, a photograph of Carroll with Trump in 1987,[a][b] testimony from two women who had separately accused Trump of sexual assault, footage from the Trump Access Hollywood tape and his October 2022 deposition.[c] A jury verdict in May 2023 found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll, and ordered him to pay US$5 million in damages. Trump appealed and made an unsuccessful counterclaim.

Regarding the accusation of rape, the judge gave to the jury "the narrow, technical meaning of that term" under New York law as it existed at that time, which defined rape as forcible penetration with the penis, as Carroll had specifically alleged.[11] The jury rejected her rape claim, but found Trump liable for a lesser degree of sexual abuse than rape.[12] In July 2023, Judge Kaplan clarified that the jury had found that Trump had raped Carroll according to the common definition of the word.[d][e] In August 2023, Kaplan dismissed a countersuit and wrote that Carroll's accusation of "rape" is "substantially true".[11]

In September 2023, Kaplan issued a partial summary judgment regarding Carroll I, finding Trump liable for defamation via his 2019 statements. The jury verdict from the January 2024 trial was $83.3 million in additional damages. To appeal, Trump secured a bond for this amount plus 10 percent.

Background

See also: Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations, E. Jean Carroll § Les Moonves, and False or misleading statements by Donald Trump
Carroll in 2006 (age 62), ten years after the alleged incident

On June 21, 2019, E. Jean Carroll published an article in New York magazine titled Hideous Men,[16] stating that Donald Trump had sexually assaulted her in late 1995 or early 1996 in the Bergdorf Goodman department store in New York City. Contrary to Trump's later assertion that she was a "then almost sixty-year-old woman",[17] she is less than three years Trump's senior, being 52 at the time, and he 49. Further details of the reputed incident were published in Carroll's 2019 book What Do We Need Men For?: A Modest Proposal.[18][19][20] Carroll said that on her way out of the store she ran into Trump and he asked for help buying a gift for a woman. After she suggested a handbag or a hat, the two reputedly moved on to the lingerie section and joked about the other trying some on. Carroll said they ended up in a dressing room together, the door of which was shut, and Trump forcefully kissed her, pulled down her tights and raped her before she was able to escape. She stated that the alleged incident lasted less than three minutes,[2][21] during which time there was no sales attendant present in the department.[22] Lisa Birnbach and Carol Martin told New York magazine that Carroll had confided with them shortly after the alleged assault.[19][18][23]

The allegations were made during the first Trump administration. In an official government statement, Trump denied that he had ever met Carroll, accused her of trying to sell books, implied she had a political agenda, compared the accusation to one against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and said Bergdorf Goodman had confirmed they had no surveillance footage of the alleged incident. Trump further called on the public to provide information indicating that Carroll was conspiring with the Democratic Party or New York magazine.[1][24]: 59, 88  Trump separately stated in an interview with The Hill that Carroll was "totally lying" and that "she's not my type."[2] Carroll provided New York with a photograph of her and her then-husband John Johnson socializing with Trump and his then-wife Ivana Trump in 1987.[19][25][3] Trump dismissed its significance, saying, "Standing with my coat on in a line—give me a break—with my back to the camera. I have no idea who she is."[2]

Carroll initially chose not to describe the alleged sexual assault as rape, instead describing it as a fight. "My word is fight. My word is not the victim word ... I fought."[26][27][28][f]

A couple of weeks after the New York magazine article was published, Carroll ran into lawyer George Conway (a Trump critic and husband of Kellyanne Conway), who told her to file a defamation lawsuit and helped her find a lawyer. Conway then wrote an op-ed for The Washington Post encouraging readers to believe Carroll.[31]

Original defamation lawsuit Carroll I (November 2019–April 2023)

See also: § Return to original defamation lawsuit (May 2023–present)

In November 2019, Carroll filed a defamation lawsuit with the New York Supreme Court. The suit states that Trump had damaged her reputation, substantially harmed her professionally, and caused emotional pain.[g]

Decades ago, the now President of the United States raped me. When I had the courage to speak out about the attack, he defamed my character, accused me of lying for personal gain, even insulted my appearance. No woman should have to face this. But this lawsuit is not only about me. I am filing this on behalf of every woman who has ever been harassed, assaulted, silenced, or spoken up only to be shamed, fired, ridiculed and belittled.[33]

— E. Jean Carroll, in an email explaining her first lawsuit to NPR in 2019

After the lawsuit was filed, White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham described the lawsuit as "frivolous" and Carroll's story as fraudulent.[33]

Trump in 2019

In January 2020 Carroll's attorneys served a request for a DNA sample from Trump for "analysis and comparison against unidentified male DNA present" on a black dress she was wearing when the alleged assault occurred.[4] In December 2020 Carroll said she was willing to delay collecting the sample and testimony from Trump in exchange for earlier access to other relevant records.[34] The DNA sample request included a DNA report on Carroll and five others who may have come into contact with the dress during a photo shoot.[35]

In September 2020 government lawyers from the Department of Justice (DOJ) asserted that Trump had acted in his official capacity while responding to Carroll's accusation; they said that the Federal Tort Claims Act[h] grants their department the right to take the case from Trump's private lawyers and move it to federal court. A White House official also argued that the act provides precedent for the government to exercise this right.[36] Carroll's lawyer Roberta Kaplan stated that "Trump's effort to wield the power of the U.S. government to evade responsibility for his private misconduct is without precedent."[36] In October 2020, U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan (of no relation to Roberta Kaplan)[37] rejected the DOJ's motion, ruling that the president is not a government employee and that Trump's comments were not related to his job as such.[38] The following month, the DOJ filed an appeal with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.[38]

In June 2021 (during the Biden administration) the DOJ argued to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals that DOJ lawyers should defend Trump as a federal employee, stating, "Speaking to the public and the press on matters of public concern is undoubtedly part of an elected official's job."[39] On September 27, 2022, the appeals court passed the question of whether Trump was shielded by his former office as U.S. president on to the District of Columbia (D.C.) appeals court.[40] Trump's attorney Alina Habba praised the ruling as a reversal of the District Court's stance (that the comments were not executive business).[40]

In January 2023 the District of Columbia (D.C.) appeals court held oral arguments before a full panel of judges.[41] Trump's lawyers argued that his comments fell within the scope of his employment, while some judges pointed out that D.C. law holds employers responsible when their employees cause individuals harm in the scope of their employment but not otherwise.[42][7] Judge Catharine Easterly noted that employer liability cases usually have a trial record and jury verdict to refer to, while Judge John Howard questioned whether further fact-finding was warranted.[7]

A photograph of (left to right) Trump, Carroll, Carroll's then-husband John Johnson, and Trump's then-wife Ivana Trump in 1987. When shown this image, Trump mistook Carroll for his second wife, despite having said Carroll was "not [his] type".[43]

In March 2023, Judge Kaplan ruled that the infamous Donald Trump Access Hollywood tape and the testimonies of Jessica Leeds and Natasha Stoynoff (who both allege that Trump began groping them without permission) would be admissible at the trial for the original lawsuit.[44][i] He then postponed the trial for the defamation claim while the appeals court continued to deliberate.[46]

On April 21, 2023, the Second Circuit Appeals Court said it should not be responsible for deciding the question of whether Trump had acted within the scope of his role as president when he made public comments about Carroll, and it remanded the issue to the U.S. District Court for Judge Kaplan to decide.[47][48][49] In July, the DOJ recanted its position that Trump was acting in his official capacity.[50]

Statement by Trump (October 2022)

On October 12, 2022, Trump published a lengthy post on Truth Social against E. Jean Carroll, to which he attached a June 2019 photograph of her. Carroll would later successfully claim this post as defamatory in her lawsuit against him.[51][52][53]

This "Ms. Bergdorf Goodman" case is a complete con job ... I don't know this woman, have no idea who she is, other than it seems she got a picture of me many years ago, with her husband, shaking my hand on a reception line at a celebrity charity event. She completely made up a story that I met her at the doors of this crowded New York City Department Store and, within minutes, "swooned" her. It is a Hoax and a lie, just like all the other Hoaxes that have been played on me for the past seven years. ... She has no idea what day, what week, what month, what year, or what decade this so-called "event" supposedly took place. The reason she doesn't know is because it never happened, and she doesn't want to get caught up with details or facts that can be proven wrong. If you watch Anderson Cooper's interview with her, where she was promoting a really crummy book, you will see that it is a complete Scam. She changed her story from beginning to end, after the commercial break, to suit the purposes of CNN and Andy Cooper. ... For the record, E. Jean Carroll is not telling the truth, is a woman who I had nothing to do with, didn't know, and would have no interest in knowing her if I ever had the chance.[54]

— Excerpted from the October 12, 2022 Truth Social post by Donald Trump

Deposition of Trump (October 2022)

Trump's ex-wife Marla Maples, whom Trump mistook Carroll for in the 1987 photograph of the latter two together[43]

Trump was deposed by Carroll's lawyer Roberta Kaplan on October 19.[55] Trump said that he usually had security guards with him but was unable to name any working for him at that time.[24]: 73–76  He denied reaching out to Bergdorf Goodman ahead of his statements in 2019, arguing that "if it did happen, it would have been reported within minutes."[24]: 78  He accused Carroll and her lawyer of being "aligned with Hillary Clinton", an assertion he based on "somebody [having] mentioned it", but admitted that he had no knowledge of Carroll's political party or documentation of her pursuing a political agenda;[56] he went on to repeatedly accuse Roberta Kaplan of being a political operative of Clinton or the Democratic Party.[57] When asked if anyone had given him information on Carroll conspiring with that party or New York magazine, Trump said, "I'll let you know."[24]: 202  He threatened to sue Carroll and Kaplan after the proceedings were complete.[58][59] He also accused Carroll of attempting to sabotage his 2024 presidential campaign by keeping him "busy with litigation."[56][24]: 130–131  Trump called the litigation a hoax comparable to supposed ruses against him related to both Russia and Ukraine.[60]

Trump reiterated that Carroll was "not my type", and told the lawyer, "You would not be a choice of mine either ... under any circumstances."[61] Trump was shown the photograph he had characterized as a reception line at a charity event, but proceeded to mistakenly identify the image of Carroll as his second wife, Marla Maples, despite his first wife Ivana Trump also being in the picture;[3] upon recognizing his mistake, he protested that the photo was "very blurry". He then confirmed that all of his wives were his "type", and that by type he primarily meant physical type.[62] Despite attacking Carroll for not remembering the exact year of the alleged incident, Trump was unable to state the exact years of the beginning or end of any of his marriages when asked, and claimed that he was unsure if he had any extramarital affairs during his first marriage (including with Maples, despite this affair having regularly featured in New York tabloids).[62]

Trump reiterated in his deposition that he did not know Carroll before she sued him, calling her a "nut job" and inaccurately asserting that in her CNN interview with Anderson Cooper she "actually indicated that she loved" the alleged assault and "said it was very sexy to be raped".[60][29] (Carroll had actually said, "I was not thrown on the ground and ravished, which... The word rape carries so many sexual connotations. This was not—this was not sexual. It just hurt. ... I think most people think of rape as being sexy.")[29][30][26] He said Carroll alleged he "swooned" her, a word he said he used because he thought it would be more polite than saying fucked.[62] When asked if he had made the statements in the Access Hollywood tape (e.g., "when you're a star, [beautiful women] let you do it. They let you do anything. ... grab 'em by the pussy"), Trump responded, "Well, historically, that's true with stars. If you look over the last million years, that's largely true, unfortunately or fortunately." He then agreed that he was such a "star".[63]

Lawsuit alleging battery and defamation (November 2022–present)

Expansion to battery claim (Carroll II; November 2022)

On November 24, 2022, Carroll sued Trump for battery under the Adult Survivors Act (a law passed the previous May which allows sexual-assault victims to file civil suits beyond expired statutes of limitations).[64][65] Carroll made a renewed claim of defamation, citing Trump's statements on Truth Social from October.[66][67] The second suit alleges that: Trump manhandled Carroll, "pulled down her tights", groped around her genitals and raped her;[68] this reputedly left Carroll unable to develop sexual relationships.[63] Carroll sought unspecified damages for the two charges and for Trump to retract his Truth Social statements about her.[68] Lawyers for Trump said in a December 19 court filing that they would request a dismissal of the lawsuit partially on the basis that the New York law is invalid due to its allegedly contradicting the state's constitution regarding due process.[69][58] Judge Kaplan set an April 25, 2023 trial date and denied the request to dismiss the lawsuit.[58][70]

As the case is the second to be called E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump, it is distinguished by the name Carroll II.[71][72]

Pre-trial (January–April 2023)

One of the discovery disputes was over Trump's DNA. On February 10, Joe Tacopina, who had become Trump's lead lawyer in the case on January 31, 2023, said Trump would be willing to provide a DNA sample, though the discovery period had ended after three years of Carroll's lawyers requesting such a sample.[73][4][5] Further, Tacopina stipulated that an appendix from Carroll's report (chiefly regarding her own DNA) must first be proffered and that Trump's DNA would be submitted only to be compared to the material on the dress.[74][35] Carroll's lawyer asserted that the motion was a "bad-faith effort to taint the potential jury pool".[35] On February 15 Judge Kaplan dismissed Trump's offer as an out-of-line delay tactic.[75] Further, the judge argued that the presence of Trump's DNA would not conclusively prove whether a rape occurred as no sperm was detected.[76] In late March, the judge prohibited any mention of DNA evidence at the trial.[5][c]

On February 16, 2023, Trump's lawyers requested that the allegations from Leeds and Stoynoff and the Access Hollywood tape be barred as evidence (the tape having been cited by Carroll's lawyer as evidence of a larger pattern of sexual misconduct).[77][78] Carroll's counsel argued that the accounts of the two women demonstrate a "consistent pattern".[79] On March 2 Trump's lawyers again asked for the tape's dismissal, arguing that it does not demonstrate a pattern of behavior consistent with Carroll's accusation.[80][81] In March, Kaplan ruled that the tape and testimony from the two women would be admissible at the trial for the second suit[i] along with testimony from two Bergdorf Goodman employees.[82] Trump's purported "rebuttal damage expert" was rejected because he did not qualify as an expert witness.[83] Kaplan also denied a joint request from both parties to consolidate the two lawsuits into one trial.[46]

On February 23 Trump's lawyers requested that the defamation claim in the second lawsuit be dismissed, arguing that his Truth Social post from October was merely a response regarding the first lawsuit which mostly repeated previous positions (despite making original incursions),[j] and was thus protected under supposed "absolute litigation privilege" provided by New York State Civil Rights Law § 74.[86][85][87] In late March, Judge Kaplan denied this request.[88]

On March 11 Judge Kaplan asked Trump and Carroll if they had any objection to the use of an anonymous jury.[89] On March 23 Kaplan ruled that the jury would be anonymous for the trial. He cited Trump's incendiary rhetoric against perceived enemies (including officials) ahead of his criminal indictment in New York related to hush money payments to Stormy Daniels.[90][82][91] On April 10 Kaplan ruled that the jury would be anonymous even to the lawyers involved in the case, citing threats by Trump supporters against Judge Juan Merchan, who was overseeing the New York criminal investigation of The Trump Organization.[91] On April 14 Kaplan upheld his ruling for an anonymous jury and denied a request from Trump's team for information about its members on the basis of possible bias after they cited negative online comments made about him on Carroll's June 2019 New York article.[92][93]

On April 10 Trump and Carroll were given ten days to declare whether they would attend the trial.[94] Defense attorney Tacopina speculated about "logistical and financial burdens upon New York City" associated with Trump's physical appearance. On April 20 the judge argued that Trump had had "ample time" to make arrangements for trial and said it would be no easier for the Secret Service to protect him at his newly announced April 27 campaign event in New Hampshire than at the simultaneous trial.[95][96]

On April 11 defense attorney Tacopina asked to delay the trial by a month, arguing that media coverage of the Daniels scandal would taint the jury pool. Carroll's lawyer argued that Trump "instigated (and sought to benefit from) ... much of the very coverage about which he now complains."[97] On April 17 Kaplan agreed with Carroll's lawyer and ruled against the delay request, arguing that there was no reason to assume jury selection would be easier to conduct in May.[98][99]

On April 13 Trump's attorneys asked to reopen discovery about whether Carroll knew that her lawyer's firm had received donations from Democrat-aligned billionaire and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman. Judge Kaplan allowed discovery for the "carefully circumscribed examination of that narrow question". Trump's attorneys requested an extra month to make this inquiry, but Kaplan refused to delay the trial.[100][101] On April 21 the judge sealed the information related to Hoffman's alleged contributions, as requested by Carroll's team.[102]

Trial (April–May 2023)

The trial began on April 25, 2023, in federal court at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.[68][103] That day, the judge selected a jury of six men and three women,[104] anonymous even to the judge, and it was arranged that the jury would be transported by U.S. Marshals from an underground garage throughout the trial.[105] In opening statements that day, the judge advised both counsel to tell their clients to avoid comments likely to "inspire violence".[103]

On April 26 Carroll testified; she said she was unaware if any employees were present during the alleged incident because the department was on a different story and she was focused on riding the escalator, while also supposing that the encounter would make a humorous anecdote. She said after entering the dressing room, Trump slammed her against the wall (hurting the back of her head) and digitally penetrated her before doing so with his penis (causing vaginal pain). She said she struggled against Trump, and upon leaving the store, was "extremely rattled" and in disbelief about what happened. She talked with her friend Lisa Birnbach on the phone, thinking, "If Lisa thought it was funny then it was not a bad thing and I didn't completely do a stupid thing," Carroll recalled thinking. "I had not processed it. I had not processed what was going on." Birnbach told Carroll, who was laughing on the phone, that it wasn't funny, that Carroll was raped and should report the assault to the police, Carroll testified.[106]

Carroll said that the following evening she told her friend and co-worker Carol Martin, who reputedly confirmed Carroll's fear that if she publicly discussed the incident, Trump would retaliate via his legal team.[106] She further acknowledged her political distaste of Trump but said, "I'm settling a personal score because he called me a liar repeatedly and it really has decimated my reputation." She said she did not go public during Trump's 2016 campaign because "the more women who came forward to accuse him, the better he did in the polls."[106] Additionally, Carroll said she initially thought the incident happened in 1994 or 1995, until realizing Lisa Birnbach visited Mar-a-Lago to write a February 1996 New York story on Trump (after 5–6 months of communicating by phone), which Carroll said would not have occurred if her friend knew about the alleged attack.[107][108]

Also on April 26, Carroll's lawyers introduced a 2017 email exchange between her and Martin, indicating an intention to "scheme" by doing their "patriotic duty". Carroll stated that she was not scheming to "bring down Donald Trump", as Tacopina suggested the messages could imply.[109] A former Bergdorf Goodman manager testified that departments were often left unattended and dressing rooms left open (though the doors would have automatically locked if closed).[106] The judge ruled that evidence related to Reid Hoffman's funding of the trial was inadmissible, saying, "I've determined there is virtually nothing there in terms of credibility."[110] Trump commented about the suit on Truth Social, calling it a scam and mentioning the (inadmissible) DNA evidence. Judge Kaplan warned Tacopina that Trump should stop making such comments, as they constitute a potential liability to him.[111]

On April 27 Carroll was cross-examined by Tacopina, who asked why she did not scream during the alleged incident. She said she "was too much in panic to scream". She said she was surprised by the sudden turn to assault, which she alleged began with Trump pushing her against the wall and kissing her, and ended with no communication between them; she said she noticed no other customers as she left. She said she had experienced daily regret since first suing Trump due to feeling threatened, elaborating that she had received many negative comments echoing Trump's attacks. Additionally, she said she was unable to recall the specific meaning of her 2017 email response to Martin.[112] Carroll said she omitted the incident from her diary because she thought it would force her to think about the negative experience, and said she was inspired to come forward by the #MeToo movement, especially the Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse cases. She said that although she wanted her book to succeed, she was not struggling financially. Tacopina mentioned the dress Carroll allegedly wore during the incident, leading the judge to stop testimony for the day, though Tacopina claimed he had not planned to mention the barred DNA evidence.[113]

Carroll finished testifying on May 1, whereat Tacopina cited inconsistencies in Carroll's account, such as her stating that she had not used the Bergdorf fitting rooms in the years after the alleged assault before saying that she actually had used them since the incident. Tacopina played an audio clip of Carroll saying that she did not blame Trump for the cessation of her romantic life, but that she "just didn't have the luck to meet that person that would cause me to be desirous again" and that "maybe in that dressing room my desire for desire was killed." Carroll had said that she was a "big fan" of Trump's show The Apprentice due to its outstanding "witty competition". She also asked on social media, "Would you have sex with Donald Trump for $17,000? Even if you could a) give the money to charity? b) close your eyes? And he's not allowed to speak." Additionally, Tacopina asked if Carroll had seen a 2012 episode of Law & Order: Special Victims Unit involving a rape in a Bergdorf fitting room, which Carroll said she had not seen and called an "astonishing" coincidence. Tacopina also referred to an incident in which Carroll called the police to report vandalism to a mailbox, prompting her to explain, "I don't want anybody to know that I suffer. Up until now, I would be ashamed to let people know what is actually going on."[114]

Also on May 1, Trump's team requested a mistrial, alleging that the judge was being unfair in Carroll's favor. During cross-examination Tacopina had questioned a passage from Carroll's 2019 book suggesting that all men should be sent to Montana for "retraining", and the judge explained it was an allusion to Jonathan Swift's A Modest Proposal (the title of which Carroll took for her 2019 book's subtitle), which satirically suggests that poor Irish people might ease their economic troubles by selling their children as food to the rich. Tacopina complained that the judge, by providing this clarification, had "bolstered [Carroll's] testimony". Judge Kaplan denied the request for a mistrial without comment.[115][114][116]

On May 2 witnesses testified for Carroll. Lisa Birnbach said that in 1996, remembering having met with Trump that January for a story she was writing, said that Carroll called her, and short of breath, alleged that Trump had just assaulted her. Birnbach reputedly offered to transport Carroll to the police, but the latter refused and requested that their conversation remain secret. Birnbach said she did not talk about it again until 2019, once Carroll had decided to go public with her account.[108][117][118] Jessica Leeds, a retired stockbroker, testified that Trump had suddenly groped her in a similar manner to Carroll while Leeds was traveling on an airplane in the late 1970s.[117] Leeds said a flight attendant invited her to move to first class and sat her next to[119] Donald Trump, whom she did not know, and that he groped her breast and tried to kiss her, but that she broke away when he started reaching up her skirt. She recalled passengers sitting behind them, who did not intervene, and reasoned that the incident may have lasted less than a minute.[117][120] Leeds said she did not speak about the incident but that Trump later saw her and referred to her as "that cunt from the airplane".[118][121] Also on May 2, Tacopina confirmed that Trump would not testify at the trial.[122]

On May 3 video of Trump's deposition was shown to the jury. Trump stated that he rarely shopped at Bergdorf Goodman and reiterated that he did not read Carroll's written accusations in either her book or in her New York magazine article. A clinical psychologist testified that she evaluated Carroll and found that she had been harmed by the alleged rape but found no signs of mental disorder.[123] Journalist Natasha Stoynoff testified that while visiting Mar-a-Lago in December 2005, Trump brought her to look at a room while his wife Melania was changing outfits; he allegedly forced her against a wall and kissed her while she tried to push him off and told her they were going to have an affair, citing the well-known "best sex I've ever had" quote attributed to his previous wife Marla Maples. Stoynoff said she only told a limited number of people because she did not want it to affect her career. A clip was played to the jury of Trump denying Stoynoff's claim while running for president, in which he implies she is unattractive. Additionally, on May 3 Tacopina announced that Trump's team would not present a defense case. Tacopina said that, due to health concerns, they decided not to call an expert witness they had proposed.[123]

On May 4 news anchor Carol Martin testified and corroborated Carroll's account of their conversation following the alleged assault, thinking it occurred sometime between 1994 and 1996, and remembering Carroll saying she had also told Birnbach. Martin said she and Carroll did not "scheme" against Trump, though the former demonstrated hate for Trump in some of her text messages.[124] Clips of Trump's deposition were played.[62] Both the prosecution and defense rested their case on May 4. That day Trump made a statement from Ireland indicating he might come to the trial. The judge allowed Trump to move to reopen the case, but Trump did not respond by the May 7 deadline.[125][126]

On May 8 closing arguments were made.[127] Carroll's lawyer Roberta Kaplan cited her client's attire during the alleged assault—a wool dress with tights—as indicating the weather at the time, which Carroll had narrowed down to after Birnbach's collaboration with Trump on a February 1996 article, further thinking it happened on a Thursday because the store was open late. Additionally, it reputedly happened while Carroll hosted a talk show on America's Talking (1994–1996), which Kaplan argued Trump likely saw in part because it was on immediately before an interview with him filmed in the same building for the same network.[128] Kaplan argued that Carroll "was trying to come to grips with the fact that she was being attacked", which she remembered in "great detail". Kaplan cited the moment in Trump's deposition when he mixed up Carroll with his wife, evidently debunking his claim that she was not his "type"; further, Kaplan asserted that Trump followed an established pattern of behavior of his when caught in wrongdoing by making an excuse (that the photograph was reputedly blurry).[128] Another of Carroll's lawyers argued that Tacopina relied on rhetoric rather than evidence and cited Trump's failure to deny the charges in person, further ridiculing the idea that Carroll, Birnbach, and Martin secretly conspired to take down Trump based on the plot of an episode of Law & Order: SVU.[128] Tacopina focused on the gaps in the plaintiff's case, particularly the unknown date of the incident, asserting that she "tailored her testimony" by saying she realized it was on a Thursday, and accused her of failing to bring the case to police because it "would never make it through a police investigation in a million years".[129] Tacopina repeated Trump's dismissal of the Access Hollywood tape as wikt:"locker room talk" and argued that it shows Trump bragging about "women letting you do something" rather than sexual assault. He argued that Leeds's story was false because other airline passengers would not have sat by and let it happen. He also asserted that the prosecution could have called Trump as a witness but, "Instead, what they want is for you to hate him enough to ignore the facts."[129]

Verdict and aftermath (May 2023–present)

The jury reached a unanimous decision on May 9, 2023, after deliberating for less than three hours.[130] Considering the preponderance of the evidence, the jury delivered a verdict that first stated that Carroll had not proven that Trump raped her, and next stated that Carroll did prove that Trump had sexually abused her, and also stated that Trump defamed Carroll with false statements made with actual malice in the October 2022 Truth Social post; thus the jury awarded Carroll a total of $5 million in damages from Trump.[53][131][132]

In an appearance on CNN the day after the verdict, Trump continued to disparage Carroll; he called her a "whack job", said the trial was "rigged", denied raping Carroll and said "I didn't do anything else either", and claimed "I don't know who the hell she is."[133][134] This led Carroll to consider a third defamation lawsuit against Trump concerning these comments.[135]

On May 11, 2023, Trump appealed the verdict.[136] On June 8, Trump's team requested the award to be reduced to under $1 million or that a new trial should be held regarding damages, citing the jury's supposed rejection of the rape claim.[137][138] Carroll's lawyers said that Trump mischaracterized the verdict (that he sexually abused Carroll) as supporting his contention that he did not rape her.[139] On June 23, Trump's lawyers proffered $5.55 million to a federal court in case the appeal failed.[140][141]

On June 27, Trump filed a counterclaim alleging that Carroll had defamed him, particularly when she told CNN "yes he did" rape her in response to a question about the jury not finding him liable for that offense. According to Carroll's lawyer, four other statements made in the counterclaim occurred outside New York's one-year statute of limitations.[142] On August 7, Judge Kaplan dismissed the counterclaim[143] and wrote that Carroll's accusation of "rape" is "substantially true".[11] A few days later, Trump appealed the dismissal.[144]

On July 19, Judge Kaplan denied Trump's bid for a new trial, as there was no "seriously erroneous result" nor "miscarriage of justice". Analyzing Trump's arguments, Kaplan found that Trump "misinterprets the jury's verdict", as in actuality, the "proof convincingly established, and the jury implicitly found, that Mr. Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll's vagina with his fingers, causing immediate pain and long lasting emotional and psychological harm".[145][146] Kaplan affirmed that Trump had raped Carroll according to the common meaning of the word[d] and ruled against altering the award amount.[13][14][15][147]

On May 14, 2024, Carroll's lawyers requested an expedited appeal, arguing that its completion by July 2024 would lessen the chance of Trump seeking delays related to other trials or his potential presidency.[148]

The federal appeals court held a hearing on Trump's appeal on September 6, 2024 in lower Manhattan. During the 25-minute hearing, Trump's lawyers argued that evidence was improperly shown to the jury. They specifically cited the testimony of Jessica Leeds, who told the jury Trump groped her on an airplane in the 1970s and the "Access Hollywood" tape. They also argued that they were “unreasonably restricted” from asking questions about billionaire Reid Hoffman, making arguments about Trump critic George Conway’s conversations with Carroll ahead of her lawsuit and from questioning Carroll about statements she made relating to Trump’s DNA and her dress. A decision is not expected until after the 2024 Election Day.[149]

Return to original defamation lawsuit (May 2023–present)

Pretrial (May 2023–January 2024)

On May 9, 2023, Judge Kaplan explained to jurors a verdict form, discussing three types of battery for which Trump could be liable to pay damages under New York law: rape, sexual abuse, and forcible touching.[150][151][152]

Seeking $10 million in damages, Carroll amended her original defamation suit on May 22, 2023, to include additional comments Trump made following the verdict against him that month, both on a CNN town hall broadcast and Truth Social.[153][154] After that amendment was filed, Trump made further negative remarks about Carroll on Truth Social, in which he admitted he had met her as captured by the 1987 photograph,[155][156] despite having otherwise claimed (including in his 2019 official statement) that he had not.[1]

In court filings on May 26 and June 5, Trump's lawyers sought to prevent Carroll from amending her case, including her replacement of the word 'rape' with 'sexual assault', on the basis that the May verdict rejected Carroll's claim that Trump raped her. In fact, the jury only found that the rape accusation was unproven as compared to sexual abuse.[157][158] On June 13, Judge Kaplan ruled that Carroll could amend her lawsuit.[159] Two days later, Kaplan ruled that the trial would begin on January 15, 2024, unless the case had "been entirely disposed of" by that date.[160]

On June 1, Kaplan denied a Trump ally's request to dismiss the case on the basis that Trump was being persecuted for being a white Christian.[161]

Trump's team asked for the case to be dismissed partially based on free speech protections and purported presidential immunity; on June 29, Kaplan denied this request, arguing that novel defenses (e.g., absolute immunity) had been introduced too late.[162] Trump's team appealed this decision and requested for the trial to be delayed during the appeal effort; on August 18, Kaplan denied the delay.[163] On September 12, Alina Habba argued to a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Appeals Court that District Court proceedings should be stayed until the appeals court "resolves whether a president may raise his immunity defense".[164] The next day, the appeals court denied the stay request but granted an expedited appeal process, which would also cover the matter of Trump's dismissed counterclaim.[165][166][167] During an October 23 hearing, Circuit Judge Denny Chin defended Kaplan's opinion that Trump's immunity defense had been introduced too late.[167] On December 13, the 2nd Circuit ruled that Trump could not use presidential immunity as a defense because he had raised it too late.[168] On January 8, the 2nd Circuit declined to take up Trump's appeal again.[169]

On July 11, 2023, the DOJ dropped its prior position that Trump had been acting in the scope of his office when making his initial responses to Carroll's allegations.[50][170]

On September 6, 2023, Kaplan issued a partial summary judgment in favor of Carroll, ruling that Trump was liable for defaming Carroll via statements he made in 2019. Kaplan ruled that the jury's verdict in Carroll II "plainly established that Mr. Trump's 2019 statements were false", with the "substantive content" of Trump's defamatory 2022 statement being "identical to the substantive content" of Trump's 2019 statements; in both statements, Trump accused Carroll of "concocting a sexual assault allegation for improper purposes"; since "the jury considered and decided issues that are common to both cases" and concluded that "the sexual assault occurred", this indicated that "Carroll did not lie about it".[171][172] As a result, the 2024 trial was expected to primarily focus on determining the amount of additional damages Trump will owe Carroll.[172]

On November 3, Kaplan announced that the jury would again be anonymous, citing Trump's statements about the court and case.[173] On November 13, Trump's team moved to add "a new rebuttal expert", after the court twice rejected proposed expert witness Robert Fisher (who argued Carroll "benefitted from this public dispute").[174] On November 29, Trump posted on Truth Social that the Adult Survivors Act was unconstitutional, further disparaging Carroll and calling the case "election interference" (as he had said about a number of other unsettled legal matters).[175]

On December 21, less than a month before the trial's start date, Trump's team requested a 90-day delay to allow further appeal planning (possibly including a strategy of asking for the case to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court),[c] citing Special Counsel Jack Smith's recent description of the question of immunity as being "weighty and consequential" in the federal criminal case against Trump for alleged election obstruction.[176][177] On December 28, a three-judge panel for the 2nd Circuit Appeals Court denied the delay request.[178][179]

Also on December 21, Carroll's lawyer asked Judge Kaplan to indicate quotes from the New York civil investigation of The Trump Organization he intended to cite in the trial. The judge responded that Trump's testimony related to his wealth would be relevant to the jury's calculation of punitive damages he must pay Carroll.[180]

Trump's lawyers requested on December 28 that the transcript of his October 2022 deposition be omitted as evidence from the 2024 trial because he might provide new testimony.[181] On January 4, 2024, Judge Kaplan denied the request as frivolous.[182] That morning, Trump posted 31 links on Truth Social to negative stories and online posts about Carroll, as well as video clips stripped of context to make her statements about sexual assault seem fetishistic.[183] On January 6, Trump mocked Carroll at a political rally for not screaming during the "made up" attack. That night, the judge ruled that Trump's lawyers could not argue before the jury that Trump did not rape Carroll.[184][185] On January 9, Kaplan further ruled that the defense could not argue about Carroll's choice of lawyer, who was paying her legal fees, her romantic/sexual proclivities, or that Trump did not sexually abuse her or act with actual malice when making disparaging comments about her.[186] Discussion of DNA evidence by either party was also barred.[6] The judge affirmed that, contrary to implications by the defense, the trial would not be a "do over" of past proceedings and was to focus (as established) on additional damages owed to Carroll.[187][172] Additionally on January 14, Kaplan ruled that Trump could not present Anderson Cooper's interview with Carroll or suggest she hoped to boost book sales.[188]

On January 12, 2024, Carroll's lawyer asked Judge Kaplan to ensure that if Trump testified, Trump first be required to tell the jury that he would keep his comments to the matter at hand and not make barred arguments, saying "his recent statements and behavior [e.g. in his New York business trial] strongly suggest that he will seek to sow chaos".[189] Carroll's lawyer also asked that Trump be required to admit he sexually abused Carroll and disparaged her with actual malice.[190] Also on January 12, the judge denied a request from Trump to delay the trial by a week so he could attend the funeral of his mother-in-law, prompting an incendiary Truth Social post.[191] On January 13, Carroll's lawyer argued that Trump's counsel misrepresented the reason for his unavailability on January 17, as a campaign event was scheduled for that day.[192] On January 14, the judge granted a continuance allowing Trump to testify on January 22, even if all other matters in the trial had concluded.[193][190]

After his being frequently mentioned by the defense in the first trial,[31] on January 13, lawyer George Conway said he would be "admitted into evidence" in the case.[194] On January 15, Tacopina withdrew from Trump's counsel.[195] A few days later, Tacopina told MSNBC that "It was just my time," and said he had withdrawn for both personal and moral reasons.[196]

Trial (January 2024)

The trial began on January 16, 2024, with Trump in attendance and Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presiding.[197] A nine-member jury was selected,[198] again being anonymous even to the lawyers and judge, who recommended using nicknames for further protection.[199] Ahead of opening statements, Trump's Truth Social account made 22 posts about Carroll,[200] which the latter's counsel cited in opening statements.[198] Habba argued that Carroll's attackers were not inspired by Trump because Carroll was first attacked online before Trump denied her allegations. Habba insinuated that Carroll wanted "Trump to pay her for the mean tweets".[200] The judge scolded Habba for repeating some arguments about topics he had already ruled on.[201]

On January 17, Carroll testified and was cross-examined.[202][203] Her counsel complained that during testimony, Trump could be heard saying things like "witch hunt" and "con job";[204] he also reportedly pounded the table.[205] The judge warned Trump that he could force him to leave. Trump replied that he "would love it".[204] Trump posted on Truth Social that he felt obligated to attend "every moment" of the trial, in addition to attacks on the judge and asserting that he was the one who was owed damages.[206][207][k] Judge Kaplan corrected Habba on trial procedure multiple times, including the process of entering evidence.[209][210]

Trump did not attend trial on January 18, as he attended his mother-in-law's funeral. A Northwestern University professor serving as an expert witness for Carroll argued that $12.1 million could be fairly spent on paying conservative pundits to repair Carroll's reputation. In her cross-examination by Habba, Carroll testified that she would prefer to have the reputation she did before accusing Trump as opposed to the popularity she gained, which she said "lowered" her reputation. After that day's proceedings, the court adjourned for the week.[211]

During the trial, Habba again targeted the connection between Carroll and George Conway, prompting the latter to state that "there's no secret there."[31] On January 19, Habba requested a mistrial in this case on the basis that Carroll had deleted emails containing death threats.[212] (Judge Kaplan eventually denied the request for a mistrial; he explained that starting the trial over again would not remedy the deleted emails.)[213] In a January 20 court filing, Roberta Kaplan said she intended to present new evidence on January 22, including out-of-court comments by Trump during the trial.[214]

On January 22, court proceedings ended early because a juror and Habba reported they were feeling unwell.[215][216] Afterwards, Trump made numerous Truth Social posts disparaging Carroll.[216] Habba requested that trial not be held on January 23, as Trump would be involved with the New Hampshire primary that day.[217] On the night of January 24, Trump posted 37 times to Truth Social about Carroll.[218]

On January 25, Carroll's counsel cited Trump testimony from the New York civil real-estate trial in which he argued he was worth billions of dollars, supporting Carroll's request for $10 million or more in damages as being relatively conservative.[219] Carroll's team rested its case that day.[220] Trump briefly testified, saying he stood by his 2022 testimony that Carroll's claim was a "hoax" and a "con job".[221] He also said he had never instructed anyone to hurt Carroll and (in a comment stricken from the record) that he "just wanted to defend" himself, his family and the presidency. The defense then rested its case.[221]

Trump arrived late on January 26.[222] As Habba talked out of turn, the judge told her she was "on the verge of spending some time in the lockup". Shortly afterward, minutes into Roberta Kaplan's closing argument, during which she argued for $12 million in damages, Trump suddenly stood up and left the courtroom.[223]

Verdict and aftermath (January 2024–present)

On January 26, 2024, the jury deliberated for three hours and awarded Carroll $7.3 million in emotional damages, $11 million in reputation-related damages, and $65 million in punitive damages, totaling $83.3 million.[222] The jury found Trump had committed sexual abuse and forcible touching, two of the three elements of Carroll's battery claim.[224] Trump said he would appeal.[225]

The judge advised the jurors not to disclose that they had served on the trial and forbade them from revealing other jurors' identities.[226]

In a January 29 letter to Judge Kaplan, Habba cited an article from the New York Post asserting that Kaplan, as a senior litigation partner, had served as something like a mentor to junior litigation associate Roberta Kaplan during their nearly two years of overlapping time at the Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison law firm in the 1990s. The following day, Roberta Kaplan called the allegations "utterly baseless" and said she could not recall directly interacting with Lewis Kaplan at all during their shared time at the firm. Habba said Roberta Kaplan's response had seemingly resolved the issue.[227]

On January 30, New York Governor Kathy Hochul mentioned the case during a bill-signing ceremony for a law expanding the state's legal definition of rape to include nonconsensual vaginal, anal, and oral contact, effective non-retroactively on September 1, 2024.[12]

On February 19, a lawyer for Carroll stated on MSNBC that their team was continuing to monitor Trump in a legal capacity, as he had that preceding weekend repeated his claim that he had not known Carroll prior to when she made her allegation against him.[228][a]

Efforts to reduce, stay or overturn judgment (February–April 2024)

On February 23, arguing that the penalty would likely be reduced or rescinded, Trump's lawyers requested a suspension of the payment deadline until a month after Kaplan was to rule on post-trial motions (scheduled to be done by March 7),[229] or allowing a lower payment around $24–40 million.[230] On February 24, Judge Kaplan denied the stay on the basis that the payment remained unsecured and Trump's team had not "first ... afforded [Carroll] a meaningful opportunity to be heard".[231][l]

On March 5, Trump's lawyers requested a reduction of damages or that a new trial be held on the basis that evidence about Trump's state of mind while commenting about Carroll had been excluded. According to Trump's team, the judge failed to instruct the jury to determine whether he acted with malice as defined by common law, which dictates that it was his "sole, exclusive desire to harm" Carroll.[233][234] On March 7, the judge denied the request, stating that Trump had "waited until 25 days after the jury verdict" to file the motion.[235]

An appeal effort required Trump to either pay the award money to the court (which would hold onto it during his appeal) or else seek a creditor to help him with an appeal bond.[225] On March 8, Trump filed an appeal notice and secured a $91.63 million bond (based on the 110% typically required by the district court to cover interest),[236][237] underwritten by a subsidiary of the insurance company Chubb.[238][m] On March 11, Carroll's lawyers asked the judge to approve the bond but requested the nullification of text in the bond agreement which added a 30-day delay to the damages payment deadline (following the appeal), plus an addition of 30 days for Chubb to pay it if Trump could not. The judge ordered that this stipulation be removed[240][241] and approved the bond the following day.[242][n]

On April 25, Kaplan upheld the judgment, finding it to pass "constitutional muster", and denied a motion for a new trial, calling the defense's arguments both legally and factually "entirely without merit".[244][245] While Trump claimed that the awarded damages were excessive, Kaplan disagreed, citing "evidence that Mr. Trump used the office of the presidency — the loudest 'bully pulpit' in America and possibly the world — to issue multiple statements castigating Ms. Carroll", while also highlighting that "Trump's malicious and unceasing attacks on Ms. Carroll were disseminated to more than 100 million people ... They included public threats and personal attacks, and they endangered Ms. Carroll's health and safety. The jury was entitled to conclude that Mr. Trump derailed the career, reputation, and emotional well-being of one of America's most successful and prominent advice columnists and authors".[246][247]

See also

References

Footnotes

  1. ^ a b In 2019, Trump dismissed the significance of the 1987 photograph of him with Carroll and both of their spouses, stating that he had never met her.[1][2]
  2. ^ Also in 2019, Trump claimed that Carroll was "not [his] type". During his October 2022 deposition, when shown the 1987 photograph, Trump mistook Carroll for his ex-wife Marla Maples.[3]
  3. ^ a b c Though discussion of it was ruled inadmissible in both trials (following years of fruitless requests for a genetic sample from Trump), potential evidence included male DNA on a garment Carroll said she was wearing during the incident.[4][5][6] While the D.C. Court of Appeals implied in early 2023 that further fact-finding might be due,[7][8] Tacopina pointed out amid Trump's arraignment in the New York criminal case that "The FBI already has his DNA. He was the president".[9][10]
  4. ^ a b New York Penal Law defines rape as vaginal penetration by the penis, which Carroll stated perhaps entered only "halfway".[13][14][15]
  5. ^ A state law passed in late January 2024 expanded the state's legal definition of rape to include nonconsensual vaginal, anal, and oral contact, effective non-retroactively beginning in September 2024.[12]
  6. ^ In her CNN interview with Anderson Cooper, Carroll explained that she felt that the word "rape" has "many sexual connotations", has been the subject of fantasies, and that she thought "most people think of rape as being sexy." She clarified that she felt that her experience "was not sexual. It just hurt."[29][30][26]
  7. ^ Carroll's lawyer Roberta Kaplan stated years later: "What was so offensive about [Trump's reaction] was the idea that she was just making it up to sell a book or two as part of a Democratic plot."[32]
  8. ^ The Federal Tort Claims Act is a 1946 federal statute that permits private parties to sue the U.S. in federal court for most torts committed by persons acting on behalf of the U.S.
  9. ^ a b Although the defense pointed out that someone's propensity for an action is generally inadmissible, a federal rule allows that "In a civil case involving a claim for relief based on a party's alleged sexual assault ... the court may admit evidence that the party committed any other sexual assault".[45]
  10. ^ In his Truth Social post about Carroll from October 2022, Trump claimed that she implied he "swooned" her, called her story a "hoax and a lie" like "all the [others]" against him since 2015, stated that she "has no idea ... what decade" the alleged assault occurred, and said she changed her story during her CNN interview with Anderson Cooper to suit that outlet's tastes.[84][85]
  11. ^ Trump attacked the judge for being a Bill Clinton appointee (as he had during the CNN town hall)[206] and alleged he had Trump derangement syndrome (as he had done a few days earlier).[191] According to Chris Cillizza (writing for CNN), Trump derangement syndrome "is just the preferred nomenclature of Trump defenders who view those who oppose him and his policies as nothing more than the blind hatred of those who preach tolerance and free speech".[208]
  12. ^ On February 29, Carroll's lawyers argued against a delay on the basis that it could hinder a successful transaction, citing uncertainty around Trump's finances, especially regarding the $454 million judgment against him in the New York civil fraud case.[230] On March 2, Trump's team argued that Carroll's team was being inconsistent because they previously cited Trump's testimony in the New York civil fraud case about his wealth (made prior to the $454 million judgment).[232]
  13. ^ If the appeal failed, 9% annual interest would accumulate. It is likely that Trump guaranteed repayment to Chubb, possibly with collateral.[239]
  14. ^ Per the bond terms, Chubb would only secure this appeal.[238] The company's chief executive officer, Evan Greenberg, stated that the bond was not an endorsement of Trump and had "nothing to do with the underlying merits" of the appeal.[243]

Citations

  1. ^ a b c Trump, Donald J. (June 21, 2019). "Statement on the Assault Allegation by E. Jean Carroll". The American Presidency Project. Archived from the original on February 23, 2023. Retrieved February 23, 2023 – via University of California, Santa Barbara.
  2. ^ a b c d Fabian, Jordan; Enjeti, Saagar (June 24, 2019). "EXCLUSIVE: Trump vehemently denies E. Jean Carroll allegation, says 'she's not my type'". The Hill. Archived from the original on November 10, 2021. Retrieved October 20, 2022.
  3. ^ a b c Snodgrass, Erin; Mitchell, Taiyler Simone; Teh, Cheryl (January 18, 2023). "Trump thought an old picture of E. Jean Carroll was his ex-wife Marla Maples, despite saying the columnist suing him for sexual assault and defamation was 'not his type'". Business Insider. Archived from the original on January 31, 2023. Retrieved January 19, 2023.
  4. ^ a b c Peltz, Jennifer (January 30, 2020). "AP Exclusive: Woman who says Trump raped her seeks his DNA". Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 17, 2021. Retrieved March 9, 2021.
  5. ^ a b c Collman, Ashley (March 27, 2023). "Trump rape case: After years of back and forth over Trump's DNA, jurors won't even hear about it". Business Insider. Archived from the original on March 28, 2023. Retrieved March 28, 2023.
  6. ^ a b Tandanpolie, Tatyana (January 10, 2024). "'This trial will not be a do-over': Judge bans Trump from denying he sexually abused E. Jean Carroll". Salon. Archived from the original on January 16, 2024. Retrieved January 16, 2024.
  7. ^ a b c Savage, Charlie (January 10, 2023). "D.C. Court Weighs Writer's Defamation Suit Against Trump". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 18, 2023. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
  8. ^ Zuckerman Spaeder LLP; Reiser, David (April 18, 2023). "Trump v. Carroll, Part III: The D.C. Court of Appeals Appropriately Clarifies D.C. Scope-of-Employment Law, But It Won't Make Westfall Act Substitution Inquiries Any Easier". JD Supra. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved April 19, 2023.
  9. ^ Italiano, Laura; Seddiq, Oma (April 6, 2023). "Booking Trump: No cuffs, no mugshot, no DNA swab, and perhaps the shortest perp walk in history". Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 6, 2023. Retrieved April 6, 2023.
  10. ^ Matloff, Ellen (April 4, 2023). "Trump May Be Swabbed For DNA Sample Upon Surrender. How Might His DNA Be Used?". Forbes. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
  11. ^ a b c Reiss, Adam; Gregorian, Dareh (August 7, 2023). "Judge tosses Trump's counterclaim against E. Jean Carroll, finding rape claim is 'substantially true'". NBC News. Retrieved August 13, 2023.
  12. ^ a b c The AP (January 30, 2024). "New York to expand definition of rape after E Jean Carroll's case against Trump". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 31, 2024. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
  13. ^ a b "Memorandum Opinion Denying Defendant's Rule 59 Motion" (PDF). CourtListener. United States District Court. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved July 19, 2023.
  14. ^ a b Blake, Aaron (July 19, 2023). "Analysis | Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on January 16, 2024. Retrieved July 20, 2023.
  15. ^ a b Herrmann, Mark (July 24, 2023). "The Impact Of The Denial Of A New Trial On Trump's Defamation Counterclaim Against E. Jean Carroll". Above the Law. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
  16. ^ Carroll, E. Jean. "Hideous Men". The Cut. New York Magazine. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
  17. ^ Kilander, Gustaf; Hurley, Bevan (April 27, 2023). "Read Trump's astonishing rant on E Jean Carroll's rape claim". The Independent. Archived from the original on April 26, 2023. Retrieved April 27, 2023.
  18. ^ a b Haynes, Danielle (June 17, 2019). "Journalist E. Jean Carroll accuses Trump, Moonves of sexual assault". UPI.com. Archived from the original on October 15, 2021. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
  19. ^ a b c Carroll, E. Jean (June 21, 2019). "Donald Trump Assaulted Me, But He's Not Alone on My List of Hideous Men". The Cut. Archived from the original on November 8, 2021. Retrieved June 21, 2019. Donald Trump assaulted me in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room 23 years ago. But he's not alone on the list of awful men in my life.
  20. ^ "Trump dismisses E. Jean Carroll rape allegation as 'fiction'". BBC News. June 22, 2019. Archived from the original on June 22, 2019. Retrieved June 22, 2019.
  21. ^ Crane-Newman, Molly (February 10, 2023). "E. Jean Carroll and Donald Trump may testify at upcoming NYC rape and sex assault trial". New York Daily News. Archived from the original on February 11, 2023. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
  22. ^ Stieb, Matt (March 9, 2023). "What Do A-Rod, Meek Mill, and Donald Trump Have in Common?". Intelligencer. Archived from the original on March 10, 2023. Retrieved March 10, 2023 – via New York magazine.
  23. ^ Mangan, Dan (June 21, 2019). "Donald Trump sexually assaulted E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s, writer says in new book". CNBC. Archived from the original on November 10, 2021. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
  24. ^ a b c d e Trump, Donald J. (October 19, 2022). "Videotaped Deposition (excerpts)" (PDF). Court Listener. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 25, 2023. Retrieved February 22, 2023 – via Free Law Project.
  25. ^ McGann, Laura (June 21, 2019). "Donald Trump is trying to gaslight us on E. Jean Carroll's account of rape". Vox. Archived from the original on March 15, 2021. Retrieved June 22, 2019.
  26. ^ a b c Victor, Daniel (June 27, 2019). "Two Women Who Heard E. Jean Carroll's Account of Being Attacked by Trump Go Public". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 27, 2021. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
  27. ^ "Corroborating E. Jean Carroll". The New York Times. June 27, 2019. Archived from the original on September 24, 2021. Retrieved September 9, 2020. Every woman gets to choose her word. Every woman gets to choose how she describes it. This is my way of saying it. This is my word. My word is fight. My word is not the victim word. I am not—I have not been raped. Something has not been done to me. I fought. That's the thing.
  28. ^ Weir, Keziah (June 28, 2019). "How Has E. Jean Carroll's Life Been Since Accusing Donald Trump? 'Fabulous. Buoyant.'". Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on November 2, 2021. Retrieved February 28, 2021.
  29. ^ a b c Benen, Steve (January 16, 2022). "Trump's deposition in Carroll case clearly does him no favors". MSNBC. Archived from the original on February 7, 2023. Retrieved January 17, 2022.
  30. ^ a b "Transcripts: Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees". Anderson Cooper 360°. CNN. June 24, 2019. Archived from the original on February 19, 2023. Retrieved February 19, 2023.
  31. ^ a b c Irwin, Lauren (January 20, 2024). "George Conway was 'flattered' by mention of his name in E. Jean Carroll's Trump suit". The Hill. Archived from the original on January 21, 2024. Retrieved January 21, 2024.
  32. ^ Moran, Lee (February 2, 2024). "E. Jean Carroll's Lawyer Says This Trump Move Led To His $83.3 Million Downfall". HuffPost. Archived from the original on February 2, 2024. Retrieved February 2, 2024.
  33. ^ a b Dwyer, Colin (November 4, 2019). "Columnist Who Accused Trump Of Sexual Assault Is Suing Him For Defamation". NPR. Archived from the original on January 26, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2021.
  34. ^ Jacobs, Shayna (December 17, 2020). "Trump can delay providing DNA sample if he turns over other evidence, accuser tells court". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 1, 2023. Retrieved January 16, 2023.
  35. ^ a b c Meko, Hurubie (February 10, 2023). "Trump Is Willing to Provide DNA in Case Filed by Writer, His Lawyer Says". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
  36. ^ a b Feuer, Alan (September 8, 2020). "Justice Dept. Intervenes to Help Trump in E. Jean Carroll Defamation Lawsuit". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 16, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2021.
  37. ^ Sforza, Lauren (May 10, 2023). "E. Jean Carroll lawyer says Trump has 'absolutely zero' grounds for appeal". The Hill. Archived from the original on May 11, 2023. Retrieved May 11, 2023.
  38. ^ a b Katersky, Aaron (November 25, 2020). "DOJ files appeal in E. Jean Carroll lawsuit against President Trump". ABC News. Archived from the original on March 7, 2022. Retrieved March 1, 2021.
  39. ^ Orden, Erica (June 7, 2021). "DOJ argues it should substitute for Trump as defendant in E. Jean Carroll lawsuit". CNN. Archived from the original on June 8, 2021. Retrieved October 20, 2022.
  40. ^ a b Polantz, Katelyn; Sneed, Tierney (September 27, 2022). "In boost to Trump, appeals court opens door to DOJ shielding him in defamation lawsuit". CNN. Archived from the original on October 6, 2022. Retrieved September 29, 2022.
  41. ^ Scannell, Kara (October 25, 2022). "DC appeals court sets oral argument in Trump defamation case for January 2023". CNN. Archived from the original on December 4, 2022. Retrieved October 27, 2022.
  42. ^ Larson, Erik (January 10, 2023). "Trump Lawyer Tells Court Response to Rape Claim Was Part of His Job". Bloomberg.com. Archived from the original on January 10, 2023. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
  43. ^ a b "E. Jean Carroll was 'exactly' Donald Trump's type, her lawyer says in closing arguments". NBC News. May 8, 2023. Archived from the original on May 11, 2023. Retrieved May 11, 2023.
  44. ^ Pandolfo, Chris; Dhanis, Marta (March 10, 2023). "Judge allows Trump Access Hollywood tape in E. Jean Carroll lawsuit". Fox News. Archived from the original on March 10, 2023. Retrieved March 10, 2023.
  45. ^ Rubin, Jordan (March 14, 2023). "Why the 'Access Hollywood' tape can be used against Trump at trial". MSNBC. Archived from the original on March 15, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
  46. ^ a b Mangan, Dan (March 20, 2023). "Trump rape defamation trial postponed, judge rejects E. Jean Carroll cases consolidation". CNBC. Archived from the original on March 21, 2023. Retrieved March 21, 2023.
  47. ^ Katersky, Aaron (April 13, 2023). "Appeals court declines to rule if Trump was acting in official capacity when he allegedly defamed E. Jean Carroll". ABC News. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2023. We have never adopted a rule that has determined that a certain type of conduct is per se within (or outside of) the scope of employment, and we decline to do so now.
  48. ^ Pullano, Nina (April 21, 2023). "Trump defamation suit returns to court that first gave it legs". Courthouse News Service. Archived from the original on April 21, 2023. Retrieved April 21, 2023.
  49. ^ "U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit". DocumentCloud. April 21, 2023. Archived from the original on April 21, 2023. Retrieved April 21, 2023.
  50. ^ a b Scannell, Kara (July 11, 2023). "DOJ no longer believes Trump should have immunity from E. Jean Carroll defamation lawsuit". CNN. Archived from the original on July 11, 2023. Retrieved July 11, 2023.
  51. ^ Scannell, Kara (November 24, 2022). "E. Jean Carroll sues Trump for battery and defamation as lookback window for adult sex abuse survivors' suits opens in New York". CNN. Archived from the original on July 26, 2023. Retrieved May 10, 2023.
  52. ^ Pullano, Nina (March 28, 2023). "Trump can't dodge claim in civil rape case nearing trial". Courthouse News. Archived from the original on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 10, 2023.
  53. ^ a b Queen, Jack; Cohen, Luc (May 10, 2023). "Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll, must pay her $5 million, jury says". Reuters. Archived from the original on May 9, 2023. Retrieved May 10, 2023.
  54. ^ Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) (October 12, 2022). "Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America". Truth Social. Archived from the original on May 10, 2023. Retrieved May 11, 2023.
  55. ^ Scannell, Kara (October 19, 2022). "Trump appears for deposition in E. Jean Carroll lawsuit". CNN. Archived from the original on March 6, 2023. Retrieved October 21, 2022.
  56. ^ a b Shamsian, Jacob (January 23, 2023). "Trump claims lawsuits are a conspiracy to 'keep him busy' ahead of 2024. He's the one making lawsuits political, judges say". Business Insider. Archived from the original on February 17, 2023. Retrieved January 24, 2023.
  57. ^ Trump, Donald J. (October 19, 2022). "Videotaped Deposition (excerpts)" (PDF). Court Listener. pp. 88–89, 142, 171, 197, 202. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 25, 2023. Retrieved February 22, 2023 – via Free Law Project.
  58. ^ a b c Scannell, Kara; Brown, Nicki (January 13, 2023). "Trump denies raping E. Jean Carroll or pressuring any woman to have sex with him in newly unsealed deposition". CNN. Archived from the original on February 13, 2023. Retrieved January 14, 2023.
  59. ^ Neumeister, Larry (January 13, 2023). "Under oath, Trump hurled insults at woman who alleges rape". Associated Press. Archived from the original on March 12, 2023. Retrieved January 14, 2023.
  60. ^ a b Jacobs, Shayna; Arnsdorf, Isaac (January 15, 2023). "Trump falsely claims in deposition that accuser spoke about enjoying rape". The Age. Archived from the original on January 30, 2023. Retrieved January 15, 2023.
  61. ^ Shoaib, Alia (May 6, 2023). "Trump told a female lawyer 'you wouldn't be a choice of mine either' while explaining that his rape accuser is not his type". Business Insider. Archived from the original on May 7, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  62. ^ a b c d Gregorian, Dareh; Reiss, Adam (May 4, 2023). "Ex-wives, 'Access Hollywood' and a 'big fat hoax': Notable moments from Trump's deposition in the E. Jean Carroll case". NBC News. Archived from the original on May 4, 2023. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
  63. ^ a b Dye, Liz (February 21, 2023). "Trump Lawyers Promise No More Delays In E. Jean Carroll Defamation Suit, Immediately Ask For Another Delay". Above the Law. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
  64. ^ Kates, Graham (October 20, 2022). "Trump's legal troubles come to a head in New York". CBS News. Archived from the original on February 24, 2023. Retrieved October 25, 2022.
  65. ^ Weiser, Benjamin (September 20, 2022). "Writer Who Says Trump Raped Her Plans to Use New Law to Prove It". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 26, 2022. Retrieved September 20, 2022.
  66. ^ Scannell, Kara (November 24, 2022). "E. Jean Carroll sues Trump for battery and defamation as lookback window for adult sex abuse survivors' suits opens in New York". CNN. Archived from the original on February 21, 2023. Retrieved November 24, 2022.
  67. ^ Weiser, Benjamin (November 17, 2022). "Writer Who Accused Trump of Rape to File New Defamation Lawsuit". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 18, 2023. Retrieved November 18, 2022.
  68. ^ a b c Orden, Erica (April 24, 2023). "Your guide to the upcoming trial in E. Jean Carroll v. Donald Trump". Politico. Archived from the original on April 25, 2023. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  69. ^ Wiessner, Daniel (December 21, 2022). "Trump will challenge NY sex abuse law in writer's defamation lawsuit". Reuters. Archived from the original on January 2, 2023. Retrieved December 22, 2022.
  70. ^ Crane-Newman, Molly (February 7, 2023). "Trump headed to trial in April in NYC rape and defamation case". New York Daily News. Archived from the original on February 9, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023 – via Yahoo! News.
  71. ^ Sullivan, Becky (April 9, 2023). "What to know about the Trump-E. Jean Carroll trial that is set to begin this month". NPR. Archived from the original on May 7, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  72. ^ Weiser, Benjamin (June 6, 2023). "Trump Asks Judge to Stop Carroll's Second Defamation Suit". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 6, 2023. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  73. ^ Shamsian, Jacob; Collman, Ashley (February 1, 2023). "Alina Habba is withdrawing as Trump's lead attorney for E. Jean Carroll's rape claim. Last month, a federal judge sanctioned her $1 million for bad lawyering". Business Insider. Archived from the original on February 17, 2023. Retrieved February 2, 2023.
  74. ^ "Donald Trump offers DNA in rape case". Fox 8 Cleveland WJW. Associated Press. February 10, 2023. Archived from the original on February 11, 2023. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
  75. ^ Schonfeld, Zach (February 15, 2023). "Judge denies Trump's offer to give DNA in E. Jean Carroll case, calling it delay tactic". The Hill. Archived from the original on February 18, 2023. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
  76. ^ Neumeister, Larry (February 15, 2023). "Judge to Trump: Too late to offer DNA to rebut rape claim". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 16, 2023. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
  77. ^ Mangan, Dan (February 17, 2023). "Trump seeks to bar evidence of 2 other alleged sexual assaults at rape defamation trial". CNBC. Archived from the original on February 19, 2023. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  78. ^ Gregorian, Dareh (February 17, 2023). "Trump seeks to bar 'Access Hollywood' tape from defamation trial". NBC News. Archived from the original on February 20, 2023. Retrieved February 18, 2023.
  79. ^ Larson, Erik (February 24, 2023). "Trump Rape Accuser E. Jean Carroll Fights to Have Other Women Testify". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on February 24, 2023. Retrieved February 24, 2023.
  80. ^ Pagliery, Jose (March 3, 2023). "Trump Lawyers in E. Jean Carroll Case Argue 'Grab 'em by the Pussy' Isn't a Pattern". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on March 3, 2023. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  81. ^ Katersky, Aaron (March 3, 2023). "Trump seeks to bar 'Access Hollywood' tape from defamation trial". ABC News. Archived from the original on March 3, 2023. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  82. ^ a b Neumeister, Larry (March 21, 2023). "Trump loses bid to have key evidence dismissed from E Jean Carroll rape trial". The Independent. Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
  83. ^ Akerman, Nick (April 4, 2023). "The other Manhattan case that can topple Trump: The federal defamation lawsuit of E. Jean Carroll may produce a quick guilty verdict". New York Daily News. Archived from the original on April 6, 2023. Retrieved April 6, 2023.
  84. ^ Shah, Areeba (October 13, 2022). "Trump melts down on Truth Social after judge blasts his attempt to 'run out the clock'". Salon.com. Archived from the original on February 23, 2023. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
  85. ^ a b Dye, Liz (February 23, 2023). "Trump Claims Immunity From Carroll Defamation Suit Because He's A Journalist Now, Okay?". Above the Law. Retrieved February 24, 2023.
  86. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (February 23, 2023). "Trump seeks to dismiss rape accuser Carroll's second defamation claim". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 24, 2023. Retrieved February 24, 2023 – via Yahoo! News.
  87. ^ "Legislation". New York State Senate. September 22, 2014. Archived from the original on February 24, 2023. Retrieved February 24, 2023. A civil action cannot be maintained against any person ... for the publication of a fair and true report of any judicial proceeding.
  88. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (March 28, 2023). "Trump fails to narrow rape accuser's case as trial looms". Reuters. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved March 29, 2023.
  89. ^ Larson, Erik (March 11, 2023). "Trump May Face Anonymous Jury in High-Profile Defamation Trial". Bloomberg.com. Archived from the original on March 11, 2023. Retrieved March 12, 2023.
  90. ^ Berman, Dan (March 23, 2023). "Carroll v. Trump jurors will be anonymous, judge says, citing Trump's reaction to hush money investigation". CNN. Archived from the original on April 2, 2023. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
  91. ^ a b Klasfeld, Adam (April 10, 2023). "Citing Trump's attacks on 'hush money' judge, court keeps E. Jean Carroll rape jury completely anonymous". Law & Crime. Archived from the original on April 11, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2023.
  92. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (April 14, 2023). "Judge rejects Trump's bid to learn juror names at defamation trial". Reuters. Archived from the original on April 16, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2023.
  93. ^ Klasfeld, Adam (April 14, 2023). "'Serial, sexual predator': Trump trawls online comments sections for insults in failed new bid to unmask anonymous jurors". Law & Crime. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2023.
  94. ^ Crane-Newman, Molly (April 10, 2023). "Donald Trump and rape accuser E. Jean Carroll have 10 days to decide whether they'll attend upcoming NYC civil trial". New York Daily News. Archived from the original on April 11, 2023. Retrieved April 11, 2023 – via Yahoo! News.
  95. ^ Katersky, Aaron (April 20, 2023). "Judge rules Trump can't claim 'logistical burdens' if he decides not to attend upcoming trial in NYC". ABC News. Archived from the original on April 21, 2023. Retrieved April 21, 2023.
  96. ^ Gregorian, Dareh; Reiss, Adam (April 19, 2023). "Trump could testify in person at E. Jean Carroll civil rape trial". NBC News. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved April 20, 2023.
  97. ^ Scannell, Kara (April 12, 2023). "Trump asks to delay sexual assault trial following historic indictment". CNN Politics. Archived from the original on April 12, 2023. Retrieved April 12, 2023.
  98. ^ "New York judge: Defamation trial against Trump to start next week". Al Jazeera. April 17, 2023. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 18, 2023.
  99. ^ Neumeister, Larry (April 17, 2023). "Judge: If news taints rape-trial jurors, Trump shares blame". Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 18, 2023.
  100. ^ Collman, Ashley (April 13, 2023). "Judge denies Trump's latest request to delay the E. Jean Carroll rape case — this time to probe billionaire Reid Hoffman's support for the litigation". Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2023 – via Yahoo! News.
  101. ^ Mangan, Dan; Breuninger, Kevin (April 13, 2023). "Judge lets Trump lawyers question rape accuser E. Jean Carroll on LinkedIn founder funding". CNBC. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 18, 2023.
  102. ^ Shamsian, Jacob (April 21, 2023). "Judge seals filings over whether billionaire Democratic donor is bankrolling E. Jean Carroll's rape lawsuit against Trump". Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 21, 2023. Retrieved April 21, 2023.
  103. ^ a b Orden, Erica (April 25, 2023). "Trial begins in civil lawsuit accusing Trump of rape". Politico. Archived from the original on April 26, 2023. Retrieved April 26, 2023.
  104. ^ Gregorian, Dareh; Reiss, Adam (April 25, 2023). "Jury selected in Trump's trial over writer E. Jean Carroll's rape allegation". NBC News. Archived from the original on April 25, 2023. Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  105. ^ Pagliery, Jose (April 25, 2023). "The Jurors in Trump's Rape Trial Have Some Notable Media Diets". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on April 26, 2023. Retrieved April 26, 2023.
  106. ^ a b c d del Valle, Lauren (April 26, 2023). "Carroll testifies: 'Donald Trump raped me and when I wrote about it, he said it didn't happen'". CNN. Archived from the original on April 26, 2023. Retrieved April 26, 2023.
  107. ^ Katersky, Aaron (April 26, 2023). "'Trump raped me,' E. Jean Carroll testifies in battery, defamation case". ABC News. Archived from the original on May 4, 2023. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
  108. ^ a b McGreal, Chris (May 2, 2023). "Witness says E Jean Carroll called her 'hyperventilating' after alleged rape by Trump". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 2, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  109. ^ Orden, Erica (April 26, 2023). "'I'm here because Donald Trump raped me,' Carroll says on witness stand". Politico. Archived from the original on April 27, 2023. Retrieved April 27, 2023.
  110. ^ Shamsian, Jacob; Collman, Ashley; Vlamis, Kelsey (April 26, 2023). "Judge says Trump's lawyers can't talk about billionaire funding E. Jean Carroll's rape lawsuit". Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 28, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  111. ^ del Valle, Lauren (April 26, 2023). "Judge in E. Jean Carroll trial warns Trump about social media comments". CNN. Archived from the original on April 26, 2023. Retrieved April 26, 2023.
  112. ^ Cooper, Aaron (April 27, 2023). "E. Jean Carroll responds to Trump attorney: 'I'm telling you, he raped me whether I screamed or not'". CNN. Archived from the original on April 28, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  113. ^ Katersky, Aaron (April 27, 2023). "E. Jean Carroll says Harvey Weinstein, #MeToo movement made her come forward about Trump". ABC News. Archived from the original on April 28, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  114. ^ a b Orden, Erica (May 1, 2023). "E. Jean Carroll concludes testimony as judge denies Trump's mistrial request". Politico. Archived from the original on May 2, 2023. Retrieved May 1, 2023.
  115. ^ Rubin, Jordan (May 1, 2023). "Trump loses bid for Carroll mistrial after lawyer's literary fumble". MSNBC. Archived from the original on May 2, 2023. Retrieved May 1, 2023.
  116. ^ Klasfeld, Adam (May 1, 2023). "'Denied': Federal judge immediately rejects Trump's request for mistrial in E. Jean Carroll civil rape case". Law & Crime. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
  117. ^ a b c Reiss, Adam; Gregorian, Dareh (May 2, 2023). "Friend testifies Carroll called her right after alleged Trump attack". NBC News. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
  118. ^ a b The AP; Neumeister, Larry; R. Sisak, Michael (May 2, 2023). "Woman testifies that she too was sexually attacked by Trump". Associated Press. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023 – via WTOC-11.
  119. ^ Neumeister, Larry; Sisak, Michael R. (May 2, 2023). "Woman testifies that she too was sexually attacked by Trump". Associated Press. Archived from the original on October 7, 2023.
  120. ^ Bekiempis, Victoria (May 2, 2023). "Jessica Leeds Testifies About Alleged Trump Assault on Plane". Intelligencer. Archived from the original on May 5, 2023. Retrieved May 9, 2023.
  121. ^ Shamsian, Jacob; Panella, Chris; Snodgrass, Erin (May 2, 2023). "Trump accuser Jessica Leeds testified that he called her the c-word after running into her years after the alleged sexual assault". Business Insider. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
  122. ^ Hurley, Bevan (May 2, 2023). "Trump lawyers confirm he will not testify at E Jean Carroll civil rape trial". The Independent. Archived from the original on May 3, 2023. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
  123. ^ a b del Valle, Lauren (May 3, 2023). "Trump doesn't plan to put on a defense case in E. Jean Carroll trial, his lawyer says". CNN. Archived from the original on May 4, 2023. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
  124. ^ Collman, Ashley; Shamsian, Jacob (May 4, 2023). "E. Jean Carroll's friend testifies that they didn't 'scheme' to make up a rape allegation to 'stop' Trump". Business Insider. Archived from the original on May 4, 2023. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
  125. ^ Dickson, Caitlin (May 4, 2023). "Judge gives Trump until Sunday to change his mind about testifying in his rape and defamation trial". Yahoo! News. Archived from the original on May 5, 2023. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
  126. ^ Scannell, Kara (May 7, 2023). "Trump will not testify in E. Jean Carroll battery trial". CNN. Archived from the original on May 7, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  127. ^ del Valle, Lauren (May 8, 2023). "Attorneys for Trump and E. Jean Carroll dispute character and evidence in closing arguments of civil rape trial". CNN. Archived from the original on May 8, 2023. Retrieved May 8, 2023.
  128. ^ a b c Kilander, Gustaf (May 8, 2023). "'Trump is a witness against himself,' E Jean Carroll lawyer says in civil rape trial". The Independent. Retrieved May 8, 2023.
  129. ^ a b Orden, Erica (May 8, 2023). "The Trump rape trial is headed to the jury. Here are the questions jurors will weigh". Politico. Archived from the original on May 9, 2023. Retrieved May 8, 2023.
  130. ^ Sullivan, Becky; Bernstein, Andrea; Marritz, Ilya; Lawrence, Quil (May 9, 2023). "A jury finds Trump liable for battery and defamation in E. Jean Carroll trial". NPR. Archived from the original on May 9, 2023. Retrieved May 10, 2023.
  131. ^ "Read the full Trump-E. Jean Carroll verdict text here". CBS News. May 9, 2023. Archived from the original on May 11, 2023. Retrieved May 11, 2023.
  132. ^ Jackson, David (May 10, 2023). "Jury finds Donald Trump liable in civil sex abuse case of E. Jean Carroll". USA Today. Archived from the original on May 12, 2023. Retrieved May 11, 2023.
  133. ^ Watson, Kathryn; Rosen, Jacob; Rinaldi, Olivia (May 10, 2023). "Trump disparages E. Jean Carroll after jury finds him liable of sexual battery and defamation". CBS News. Archived from the original on May 11, 2023. Retrieved May 10, 2023.
  134. ^ Doak, Sam; Kristensen, Nikolaj (May 12, 2023). "Trump uses CNN town hall to air multiple falsehoods". Logically. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  135. ^ Weiser, Benjamin; Fadulu, Lola; Christobek, Kate (May 11, 2023). "E. Jean Carroll May Sue Trump a Third Time After 'Vile' Comments on CNN". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 12, 2023. Retrieved May 12, 2023.
  136. ^ Knutson, Jacob (May 11, 2023). "Trump appeals jury's verdict in E. Jean Carroll's lawsuit". Axios. Archived from the original on May 11, 2023. Retrieved May 11, 2023.
  137. ^ Neumeister, Larry (June 9, 2023). "Donald Trump's lawyers seek to cut sex abuse jury award from $5M to under $1M". Associated Press. Archived from the original on June 25, 2023. Retrieved June 25, 2023.
  138. ^ Cohen, Luke; Queen, Jack (June 8, 2023). "Trump asks for new trial in E. Jean Carroll sex abuse case". Reuters. Archived from the original on June 25, 2023. Retrieved June 25, 2023.
  139. ^ Neumeister, Larry (June 22, 2023). "Writer's lawyers say Trump is wrong about $5 million sex abuse-defamation jury award". Associated Press. Archived from the original on June 23, 2023. Retrieved June 23, 2023.
  140. ^ Scannell, Kara (June 23, 2023). "Trump sets aside $5.5 million in first step to satisfy E. Jean Carroll judgment". CNN. Archived from the original on June 23, 2023. Retrieved June 23, 2023.
  141. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (June 23, 2023). "Trump sets aside money while he appeals E. Jean Carroll's $5 million verdict". Reuters. Archived from the original on June 24, 2023. Retrieved June 25, 2023.
  142. ^ Sforza, Lauren (June 27, 2023). "Trump files counterclaim against Carroll for defamation". The Hill. Archived from the original on June 28, 2023. Retrieved June 28, 2023.
  143. ^ Scannell, Kara (August 7, 2023). "Judge dismisses Trump's defamation lawsuit against Carroll for statements she made on CNN". CNN. Archived from the original on August 8, 2023. Retrieved August 7, 2023.
  144. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (August 10, 2023). "Trump appeals dismissal of defamation claim against E. Jean Carroll". Reuters. Archived from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 10, 2023.
  145. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (July 20, 2023). "Donald Trump loses bid for new trial in E. Jean Carroll abuse case". Reuters. Retrieved April 28, 2024.
  146. ^ Neumeister, Larry (July 19, 2023). "Judge upholds the $5 million jury verdict against Trump in a writer's sex abuse and defamation case". AP News. Retrieved April 28, 2024.
  147. ^ "Donald Trump Loses Bid For New Trial In E. Jean Carroll Case". HuffPost. July 19, 2023. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved July 19, 2023.
  148. ^ Valle, Lauren del (May 15, 2024). "E. Jean Carroll seeks to expedite Trump's appeal of verdict from first defamation civil trial". CNN. Retrieved May 16, 2024.
  149. ^ Sannell, Kana; del Valle, Lauren; Herb, Jeremy (September 6, 2024). "Trump attends New York court hearing to appeal verdict in Carroll sex abuse case". CNN. Retrieved September 6, 2024.
  150. ^ Weiser, Benjamin; Fadulu, Lola; Christobek, Kate (May 9, 2023). "Trump Rape Lawsuit: Jury Finds Trump Liable for Sexual Abuse and Defamation". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 18, 2024. Retrieved March 18, 2024 – via NYTimes.com.
  151. ^ Bagchi, Aysha (January 29, 2024). "Did Donald Trump rape E. Jean Carroll? Here's what a jury and judge said". USA Today. Archived from the original on March 13, 2024. Retrieved March 18, 2024.
  152. ^ "CARROLL v. TRUMP (2023)". United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Archived from the original on March 3, 2024. Retrieved March 18, 2024 – via FindLaw.
  153. ^ Cohen, Luc; Queen, Jack (May 22, 2023). "E. Jean Carroll seeks $10 mln in damages from Trump over post-verdict statements". Reuters. Archived from the original on May 23, 2023. Retrieved May 23, 2023.
  154. ^ Neumeister, Larry (May 22, 2023). "E. Jean Carroll adds Trump's post-verdict remarks to defamation case, seeks at least $10M". Associated Press. Archived from the original on May 23, 2023. Retrieved May 23, 2023.
  155. ^ O'Connell, Oliver (May 23, 2023). "Trump shows frustration in court as hush money criminal trial set amid 2024 primaries". The Independent. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023. Retrieved May 23, 2023.
  156. ^ Levin, Bess (May 23, 2023). "Donald Trump Won't Stop Defaming E. Jean Carroll—And She Won't Stop Making Him Pay for It". Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2023. I never met her ... (except on a celebrity line with her ... husband who she ... called the 'Ape.'). [sic]
  157. ^ Italiano, Laura (May 26, 2023). "Trump fights to keep the word 'rape' in E. Jean Carroll's remaining defamation case". Business Insider. Archived from the original on May 27, 2023. Retrieved May 27, 2023.
  158. ^ Neumeister, Larry (June 5, 2023). "Trump's lawyers say defamation claim by NY writer must fail because jury agreed he never raped her". Associated Press. Archived from the original on June 6, 2023. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  159. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (June 13, 2023). "E. Jean Carroll can pursue $10 million lawsuit against Trump, judge says". Reuters. Archived from the original on June 14, 2023. Retrieved June 14, 2023.
  160. ^ Stempel, Jonathan (June 15, 2023). "E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump set for January 2024". Reuters. Archived from the original on June 16, 2023. Retrieved June 16, 2023.
  161. ^ Ladden-Hall, Dan (June 2, 2023). "Bid to Dismiss Case Because Trump Is 'White Christian' Fails". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on June 18, 2023. Retrieved June 18, 2023.
  162. ^ Visser, Nick (June 30, 2023). "Judge Says Trump Can't Claim Presidential Immunity To Dismiss Defamation Suit". HuffPost. Archived from the original on June 30, 2023. Retrieved June 30, 2023.
  163. ^ del Valle, Lauren (August 18, 2023). "Federal judge denies Trump's attempt to delay a second trial with E. Jean Carroll". CNN. Archived from the original on August 18, 2023. Retrieved August 18, 2023.
  164. ^ Katersky, Aaron (September 12, 2023). "E. Jean Carroll's original defamation suit against Trump should be paused, his attorney argues". ABC News. Archived from the original on September 13, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2023.
  165. ^ Mangan, Dan (September 13, 2023). "Trump loses bid to delay E. Jean Carroll rape-defame case, but granted expedited appeal". CNBC. Archived from the original on September 13, 2023. Retrieved September 14, 2023.
  166. ^ Katersky, Aaron (September 13, 2023). "Appeals court denies Trump's attempt to stay E. Jean Carroll's 2019 lawsuit". ABC News. Archived from the original on September 13, 2023. Retrieved September 14, 2023.
  167. ^ a b Stempel, Jonathan (October 23, 2023). "US court challenges Trump appeal in rape accuser E. Jean Carroll's case". Reuters. Archived from the original on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 4, 2023.
  168. ^ O'Connor, Lydia (December 13, 2023). "Court Tells Trump He's 3 Years Too Late To Claim Immunity In E. Jean Carroll Case". HuffPost. Archived from the original on December 13, 2023. Retrieved December 13, 2023.
  169. ^ Bushard, Brian (January 8, 2024). "Trump Presidential Immunity Appeal Denied—Again—In E. Jean Carroll Case". Forbes. Archived from the original on January 9, 2024. Retrieved January 9, 2024.
  170. ^ Mangan, Dan (July 11, 2023). "DOJ won't defend Trump in Carroll rape defamation case anymore". CNBC. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 20, 2023.
  171. ^ Seiger, Theresa (September 6, 2023). "Trump loses key ruling in E. Jean Carroll's defamation case". Cox Media Group. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved September 29, 2023.
  172. ^ a b c Katersky, Aaron (September 6, 2023). "E. Jean Carroll wins partial summary judgment in original 2019 defamation case against Trump". ABC News. Archived from the original on September 10, 2023. Retrieved September 11, 2023.
  173. ^ Katersky, Aaron (November 3, 2023). "Judge orders anonymous jury for E. Jean Carroll case against Trump". ABC News. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved November 14, 2023.
  174. ^ Dye, Liz (November 13, 2023). "Trump Lawyers Bumble As Second Carroll Case Looms". Above the Law. Retrieved December 4, 2023.
  175. ^ Dobkin, Rachel (November 29, 2023). "Donald Trump may have just sparked another lawsuit". Newsweek. Archived from the original on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 4, 2023.
  176. ^ Orden, Erica (December 21, 2023). "Trump signals plan to take another immunity issue to Supreme Court". Politico. Archived from the original on December 22, 2023. Retrieved December 22, 2023.
  177. ^ Scannell, Kara (December 21, 2023). "Trump seeks to delay E. Jean Carroll civil trial to consider options, including potential Supreme Court review". CNN. Archived from the original on December 22, 2023. Retrieved December 22, 2023.
  178. ^ Nguyen, Alex (December 28, 2023). "Trump Loses Bid to Put E. Jean Carroll Defamation Trial on Hold". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on December 29, 2023. Retrieved December 29, 2023.
  179. ^ Scannell, Kara (January 2, 2024). "Federal appeals court denies Trump's effort to delay E. Jean Carroll civil trial". CNN. Archived from the original on January 10, 2024. Retrieved January 10, 2024.
  180. ^ O'Driscoll, Sean (December 29, 2023). "Donald Trump can expect huge payout In E. Jean Carroll defamation case". Newsweek. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved December 30, 2023.
  181. ^ Neumeister, Larry (December 29, 2023). "Trump's lawyers say he may testify at January trial over defamation damages in sex abuse case". Associated Press. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved December 30, 2023.
  182. ^ Edwards, David (January 4, 2024). "Trump smacked down by judge for 'utterly frivolous' longshot bid in E. Jean Carroll case". Raw Story. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 5, 2024.
  183. ^ Otten, Tori (January 4, 2024). "Trump Is Absolutely Losing It Over His E. Jean Carroll Case". The New Republic. ISSN 0028-6583. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 5, 2024.
  184. ^ The AP (January 7, 2024). "Judge Blocks Trump Lawyers From Arguing About Columnist's Rape Claim at Upcoming Defamation Trial". US News. Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
  185. ^ Shamsian, Jacob (January 24, 2024). "Trump plans to testify in E. Jean Carroll's trial. His only move would be to apologize and beg for forgiveness, experts say". Business Insider. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  186. ^ Otten, Tori (January 9, 2024). "Here's the List of Things Trump Can't Say at the Next E. Jean Carroll Trial". The New Republic. ISSN 0028-6583. Archived from the original on January 10, 2024. Retrieved January 10, 2024.
  187. ^ Pagliery, Jose (January 10, 2024). "Judge Signals Trump Is Doomed in New E. Jean Carroll Trial". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. Retrieved January 11, 2024.
  188. ^ Palmer, Ewan (January 15, 2024). "Donald Trump evidence tossed out of court by judge". Newsweek. Archived from the original on January 16, 2024. Retrieved January 16, 2024.
  189. ^ Weiser, Benjamin (January 12, 2024). "E. Jean Carroll Doesn't Want Trump to Make Defamation Trial a 'Circus'". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on January 14, 2024. Retrieved January 14, 2024.
  190. ^ a b Charalambous, Peter; Katersky, Aaron (January 15, 2024). "Judge clears way for Trump to testify at defamation trial that starts Tuesday". ABC News. Archived from the original on January 16, 2024. Retrieved January 16, 2024.
  191. ^ a b Bedigan, Mike (January 13, 2024). "Trump blasts judge for denying trial delay for mother-in-law funeral". The Independent. Archived from the original on January 14, 2024. Retrieved January 15, 2024.
  192. ^ Sforza, Lauren (January 14, 2024). "Lawyer for E. Jean Carroll suggests Trump misrepresented need to adjourn trial". The Hill. Archived from the original on January 15, 2024. Retrieved January 15, 2024.
  193. ^ Neumeister, Larry (January 14, 2024). "Judge says Trump can wait a week to testify at sex abuse victim's defamation trial". Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 15, 2024. Retrieved January 15, 2024.
  194. ^ Dobkin, Rachel (January 13, 2024). "George Conway pleased to be 'evidence' in E. Jean Carroll's Trump lawsuit". Newsweek. Archived from the original on January 16, 2024. Retrieved January 16, 2024.
  195. ^ Katersky, Aaron; Faulders, Katherine (January 15, 2024). "Attorney Joe Tacopina withdraws from Trump's legal team". ABC News. Archived from the original on January 16, 2024. Retrieved January 16, 2024.
  196. ^ Sharpton, Al (January 20, 2024). "Trump's ex-lawyer: Trump 'absolutely' can be convicted by Jack Smith". MSNBC. Archived from the original on January 21, 2024. Retrieved January 21, 2024.
  197. ^ Bekiempis, Victoria (January 16, 2024). "Trump and E Jean Carroll face each other in court for new defamation trial". The Guardian. Archived from the original on January 16, 2024. Retrieved January 16, 2024.
  198. ^ a b Hymes, Clare; Kates, Graham; Kaufman, Katrina (January 16, 2024). "The second trial between Donald Trump and E. Jean Carroll began Tuesday. Here's what to know". CBS News. Archived from the original on January 17, 2024. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
  199. ^ Pagliery, Jose (January 16, 2024). "Trump Gets True New York Jury in New E. Jean Carroll Case". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on January 17, 2024. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
  200. ^ a b Shamsian, Jacob; Italiano, Laura (January 17, 2024). "Trump attacked E. Jean Carroll again as his defamation trial was underway. Her lawyers urged the jury to 'make him stop.'". Business Insider. Archived from the original on January 17, 2024. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
  201. ^ "Video: Trump's attorney has tense exchange with judge". CNN. January 16, 2024. Archived from the original on January 17, 2024. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
  202. ^ del Valle, Lauren (January 17, 2024). "Carroll describes the safety precautions she's taken since Trump allegations became public". CNN. Archived from the original on January 17, 2024. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
  203. ^ del Valle, Lauren; Scannell, Kara; Herb, Jeremy (January 17, 2024). "January 17 - Trump's trial in E. Jean Carroll defamation case". CNN. Archived from the original on January 17, 2024. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
  204. ^ a b del Valle, Lauren; Scannell, Kara; Herb, Jeremy (January 17, 2024). "Judge threatens to kick Trump out of court. Trump responds: 'I would love it'". CNN. Archived from the original on January 17, 2024. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
  205. ^ Griffiths, Brent D. (January 17, 2024). "What are the mysterious red marks on Trump's hand?". Business Insider. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
  206. ^ a b Sullivan, Kate (January 17, 2024). "Trump says he feels he needs to attend 'every moment of' defamation trial and attacks judge". CNN. Archived from the original on January 17, 2024. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
  207. ^ O'Connell, Oliver; Sommerlad, Joe; Kilander, Gustaf (January 18, 2024). "Trump claims he deserves 'damages' after tense day at E Jean Carroll defamation trial". The Independent. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
  208. ^ Cillizza, Chris (July 19, 2018). "What is 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' -- and do you have it?". CNN. Archived from the original on February 16, 2021. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
  209. ^ Italiano, Laura; Shamsian, Jacob (January 17, 2024). "E. Jean Carroll judge bench-slaps Trump's attorney 14 times over basic lawyering in a single day of testimony". Business Insider. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
  210. ^ "Judge to Trump lawyer: 'Refresh your memory' on how to enter evidence". MSNBC. January 17, 2024. Archived from the original on January 22, 2024. Retrieved January 22, 2024.
  211. ^ del Valle, Lauren; Herb, Jeremy; Scannell, Kara (January 18, 2024). "Live updates: E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump". CNN. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
  212. ^ Shamsian, Jacob (January 19, 2024). "Trump's lawyer asked for a mistrial in his E. Jean Carroll case because she deleted death threat emails". Business Insider. Archived from the original on January 22, 2024. Retrieved January 22, 2024.
  213. ^ Scannell, Kara (February 7, 2024). "Judge denies Trump's motion for mistrial in E. Jean Carroll defamation case". CNN. Archived from the original on February 8, 2024. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
  214. ^ Lee, Lloyd (January 21, 2024). "Trump keeps talking about his defamation case outside court. E. Jean Carroll's lawyer says she'll just use it as evidence". Business Insider. Archived from the original on January 22, 2024. Retrieved January 22, 2024.
  215. ^ del Valle, Lauren; Scannell, Kara; Krieg, Greg; Berman, Dan (January 22, 2024). "Today's court proceedings are already over. Here's what happened this morning". CNN. Archived from the original on May 31, 2024. Retrieved January 22, 2024.
  216. ^ a b Reiss, Adam; Gregorian, Dareh (January 22, 2024). "Trump continues blasting E. Jean Carroll as damages trial postponed amid Covid concerns". NBC News. Archived from the original on January 24, 2024. Retrieved January 23, 2024.
  217. ^ del Valle, Lauren; Scannell, Kara; Krieg, Greg; Berman, Dan (January 22, 2024). "Trump plans to testify, his lawyer says". CNN. Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved January 22, 2024.
  218. ^ Moran, Lee (January 25, 2024). "Trump Has Midnight Meltdown Over E. Jean Carroll As Trial Resumes". HuffPost. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  219. ^ Otten, Tori (January 25, 2024). "Trump's Big Mouth Just Cost Him Big-Time in E. Jean Carroll Case". The New Republic. ISSN 0028-6583. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  220. ^ del Valle, Lauren; Scannell, Kara (January 25, 2024). "Lawyers for E. Jean Carroll have rested their case against Donald Trump". CNN. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  221. ^ a b Reiss, Adam; Gregorian, Dareh (January 25, 2024). "Trump briefly testifies in E. Jean Carroll damages trial, clashes with judge". NBC News. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 25, 2024.
  222. ^ a b Boboltz, Sara (January 26, 2024). "Jury Awards E. Jean Carroll Over $80 Million In Case Against Trump". HuffPost. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  223. ^ Neumeister, Larry; Offenhartz, Jake (January 26, 2024). "Donald Trump Storms Out Of Court During Closing Arguments Of Defamation Trial". HuffPost. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  224. ^ Larson, Erik; Hurtado, Patricia; Voreacos, David (May 9, 2023). "Trump Found Liable for Sex Abuse, Must Pay $5 Million to Carroll". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on May 17, 2023. Retrieved March 18, 2024.
  225. ^ a b Irwin, Lauren (January 27, 2024). "Trump can delay paying full E. Jean Carroll damages until after appeal: Report". The Hill. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved January 29, 2024.
  226. ^ del Valle, Lauren; Berman, Dan (January 26, 2024). "Trump must pay $83.3 million to E. Jean Carroll, jury says". CNN. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  227. ^ Gregorian, Dareh; Reiss, Adam (January 30, 2024). "Trump lawyer Alina Habba makes, then backs off, 'conflict' allegation against E. Jean Carroll judge". NBC News. Archived from the original on January 31, 2024. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
  228. ^ Chapman, Matthew (February 19, 2024). "'We're watching': E. Jean Carroll lawyer warns Trump for repeating attacks". Raw Story. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved February 20, 2024.
  229. ^ Neumeister, Larry (February 23, 2024). "Trump's lawyers seek to suspend $83M defamation verdict, citing 'strong probability' it won't stand". Associated Press. Archived from the original on February 24, 2024. Retrieved February 24, 2024.
  230. ^ a b Scannell, Kara (February 29, 2024). "E. Jean Carroll tells judge to reject Trump's request to delay $83 million judgment, calling him the 'least trustworthy of borrowers'". CNN. Archived from the original on March 2, 2024. Retrieved March 2, 2024.
  231. ^ McAfee, David (March 3, 2024). "Trump served notice E. Jean Carroll's lawyer can 'get to work' on his assets next week". Raw Story. Archived from the original on March 4, 2024. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
  232. ^ Scannell, Kara (March 2, 2024). "Trump slams E. Jean Carroll's objection to his request to delay posting bond as 'inconsistent'". CNN. Archived from the original on March 4, 2024. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
  233. ^ Reiss, Adam; Rubin, Lisa; Richards, Zoë (March 5, 2024). "Trump requests a new trial in E. Jean Carroll defamation case". NBC News. Archived from the original on March 6, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
  234. ^ Scannell, Kara (March 5, 2024). "Trump asks judge to cut the $83.3 million penalty in E. Jean Carroll case or grant him a new trial". CNN. Archived from the original on March 6, 2024. Retrieved March 7, 2024.
  235. ^ Katersky, Aaron; Charalambous, Peter (March 7, 2024). "Judge won't let Trump delay E. Jean Carroll penalties, leaving him with days to cover $83M judgment". ABC News. Archived from the original on March 7, 2024. Retrieved March 7, 2024.
  236. ^ Katersky, Aaron; Charalambous, Peter (March 8, 2024). "Trump secures $91 million bond for judgment in E. Jean Carroll defamation case". ABC News. Archived from the original on March 10, 2024. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
  237. ^ Kates, Graham (March 8, 2024). "Trump posts $91 million bond to appeal E. Jean Carroll defamation verdict". CBS News. Archived from the original on March 8, 2024. Retrieved March 8, 2024.
  238. ^ a b Scannell, Kara (March 8, 2024). "Trump posts nearly $92 million bond in E. Jean Carroll defamation case". CNN. Archived from the original on March 8, 2024. Retrieved March 8, 2024.
  239. ^ O'Driscoll, Sean (March 17, 2024). "Why Donald Trump poses 'very hazardous' risk In E. Jean Carroll case". Newsweek. Archived from the original on March 18, 2024. Retrieved March 18, 2024.
  240. ^ Katersky, Aaron; Charalambous, Peter (March 11, 2024). "E. Jean Carroll's attorneys ask judge to approve Trump's $91M bond in her defamation case". ABC News. Archived from the original on March 12, 2024. Retrieved March 12, 2024.
  241. ^ Pagliery, Jose (March 12, 2024). "E. Jean Carroll's Lawyers Foil Trump's Quiet Attempt to Stall $91 Million Payment". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on March 14, 2024. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
  242. ^ Katersky, Aaron; Charalambous, Peter (March 12, 2024). "Judge approves Trump's $91.6 million bond in E. Jean Carroll defamation case". ABC News. Archived from the original on March 13, 2024. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  243. ^ Brewer, Contessa; Mangan, Dan (March 13, 2024). "Chubb CEO defends backing Trump appeal bond in E. Jean Carroll case". CNBC. Archived from the original on March 14, 2024. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
  244. ^ Marcos, Coral Murphy (April 25, 2024). "Judge upholds $83m E Jean Carroll defamation verdict against Trump". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 31, 2024. Retrieved April 26, 2024.
  245. ^ Scannell, Kara (April 25, 2024). "Federal judge upholds verdict in E. Jean Carroll case and denies Trump's motion for a new trial". CNN. Archived from the original on May 31, 2024. Retrieved April 25, 2024.
  246. ^ Kuchar, Samantha (April 25, 2024). "Trump denied new E. Jean Carroll trial in $83.3 million defamation case". USA Today. Archived from the original on May 31, 2024. Retrieved April 26, 2024.
  247. ^ Irwin, Lauren (April 25, 2024). "Federal judge rejects Trump's latest bid to drop $83.3M E. Jean Carroll defamation ruling". The Hill. Retrieved April 26, 2024.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump&oldid=1260736212"