Talk:Acacia macdonnelliensis

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Australia: Northern Territory / Western Australia / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Acacia macdonnelliensis is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spelling

Shouldn't this article be moved to Acacia macdonnellensis? [1] --Korg (talk) 14:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The spelling used in the article is the same as used in the references. Hughesdarren (talk) 23:40, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Although after checking the other spelling has plenty of references too. Now I'm not sure what to do.... @Plantdrew: can you offer any advise for this? Hughesdarren (talk) 00:01, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hughesdarren: Good question. The original spelling is Acacia macdonnelliensis, and original spellings (even if mistaken) can only be changed for a handful of reasons. Most of the sources I'd trust have it as A. macdonnellensis; the one exception is World Wide Wattles. FloraBase credits Bruce Maslin's treatment of Acacia in Flora of Australia for macdonnellensis being the preferred spelling. The problem is, Maslin is also behind World Wide Wattles, and I believe that source is more up-to-date. It appears Maslin may have changed his mind about whether correcting the original spelling is justified. I've asked about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants#Acacia macdonnelliensis. Plantdrew (talk) 21:58, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The code of nomenclature says that original spellings should only be changed "with reserve". Macdonnelliensis would presumably be deliberate, referring to the Macdonnell ranges in the plural, and the spelling is consistent throughout the description in the original article (available here). I think that IPNI is wrong. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 22:36, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The IPNI editors have adjusted the entry, here. In email discussion this was explained as "Although the epithet 'macdonnellensis' is preferable, we need to accept the published epithet 'macdonnelliensis'. IPNI is so fundamental to other botanical databases, that the adjustment may spread in time. So this page is in the right place. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 21:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for following up with this. Plantdrew (talk) 04:43, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all! Korg (talk) 02:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]